Skip to comments.
FBI field office backtracks on party hailing Ketanji Brown Jackson
Washington Examiner ^
| March 24, 2022
| Tori Richards
Posted on 03/24/2022 4:34:58 PM PDT by truthkeeper
The FBI’s Los Angeles office had scheduled a celebration for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court nomination until a media outlet publicized the event from information gleaned from a leaked internal email.
“Save the date … a dynamic interview, socialization and lots of celebrating with desserts!” read a flyer contained in a March 11 email circulated to all employees. The Wednesday party was going to be hosted by the FBI’s women’s and black affairs committees.
But after coverage this week by the Washington Free Beacon and Tucker Carlson Tonight, FBI brass clamped down on the party. The Diversity and Inclusion Department sent out an email, saying: "The FBI must remain neutral in all political nomination and confirmation processes.
Accordingly, a party for any nominee in FBI space would be inappropriate.”
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: california; fbi; fbicorruption; ketanjibrownjackson; kristikoonsjohnson; losangeles; paulryan; scotus; tuckercarlson; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: truthkeeper
"...socialization and lots of celebrating with desserts!”Masks optional?
2
posted on
03/24/2022 4:38:34 PM PDT
by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: truthkeeper
3
posted on
03/24/2022 4:38:37 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
To: truthkeeper
Well, she wants to use the courts as a weapon and wants to overthrow the government, so of course the FBI is pretty excited.
4
posted on
03/24/2022 4:39:19 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Ukraine is not a good country and does not deserve active US support.)
To: Jamestown1630
5
posted on
03/24/2022 4:41:36 PM PDT
by
Bookshelf
To: truthkeeper
FBI’s women’s and black affairs committees.
6
posted on
03/24/2022 4:41:50 PM PDT
by
csvset
(tolerance becomes a crime when attached to evil)
To: truthkeeper
I am glad the FBI must remain neutral in all political nomination and confirmation processes. I would hate to see what they would do if they were partisan.
7
posted on
03/24/2022 4:42:06 PM PDT
by
Paperpusher
(Gal 5:15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.)
To: truthkeeper
8
posted on
03/24/2022 4:43:18 PM PDT
by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
To: truthkeeper
“...Diversity and Inclusion Department...”
All those FedGov morons need is a simple Personnel Dept, and no HR Dept, either.
9
posted on
03/24/2022 4:43:56 PM PDT
by
Carriage Hill
(A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: truthkeeper
Why in the heck is a political confirmation part of an FBI function? It’s none of their GD business. I’d suspend anyone involved in that without pay for six months.
10
posted on
03/24/2022 4:44:56 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(Today's "disinformation" most often turns out to be tomorrow's facts. )
To: truthkeeper
(Forrest Gump) “Sorry I ruined your Deep State Partay.” (/Forrest Gump)
11
posted on
03/24/2022 4:46:18 PM PDT
by
Tallguy
To: truthkeeper
12
posted on
03/24/2022 4:48:15 PM PDT
by
PeterPrinciple
(Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Settle down, boys and girls. It just goes to show if you have a guy in the Oval Office who never was approved or elected by the people.. granted, he WAS chosen by Facebook, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, AND the FBI. So, just settle down, we’re going to have a black person, who doesn’t know if the identity if a man or woman, and has horrible jurist record..but it was the choice of Facebook, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, and the FBI. Get used to it.
To: truthkeeper
Can anyone think of a reason why the FBI shouldn’t be disbanded?
14
posted on
03/24/2022 4:50:44 PM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(The steal is real.)
To: Bookshelf
I think they probably meant ‘socializing’.
I’m sure we face dangers from ‘fascists’; but we face even more from sheer ignorance Peter-principled into positions above its ability.
15
posted on
03/24/2022 4:52:03 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
To: truthkeeper
WHy is an organization which is supposed to be putting bad people away supporting a judge who lets bad people go?
16
posted on
03/24/2022 4:54:49 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
((The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.))
To: truthkeeper
Hope it turns into ‘It’s my party and I’ll cry if I want to’.
To: truthkeeper
They probably have a Soros birthday bash every year 🤪
18
posted on
03/24/2022 4:55:34 PM PDT
by
NWFree
(Somebody has to say it)
To: carriage_hill
HR Dept
/\
Speaking of,,,,
I’ve been bugged by a feeling I’ve seen brown somewhere before this,,
,, your post reminded me where,,
,, she looks a lot like the actress that plays the schools HR Director on the tv show Big Bang.
19
posted on
03/24/2022 4:56:29 PM PDT
by
cuz1961
(USCGR Veteran )
To: truthkeeper
FBI field office backtracks on party hailing Ketanji Brown Jackson
Well, the 'party' is still hailing KBJ. The democrat party, that is.
Mostly because, she fit the democrats' requirements, and those of the White House, that being that, she's black and a woman. Other than that, there are millions of lawyers in the U.S., and thousands of judges, that have better professional qualifications and more experience and better experience. Heck, she happens to be a woman and a black one at that, which is the same criteria that democrats used to GIVE Kamala the vice-presidency. That's all about democrats buying the black vote, and not about professional qualifications. Kamala and KBJ, both reflecting how damaging the affirmative action of democrats can be.
20
posted on
03/24/2022 4:58:53 PM PDT
by
adorno
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson