Posted on 03/22/2022 9:57:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The Senate hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court nomination are not going well.
Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick Durbin is blocking the release of documents showing Brown Jackson's actual record as a judge, taking a page from the tactics of impeachment-obsessed Rep. Adam Schiff. That's how Democrats do hearings these days.
According to John Solomon's Just The News:
The Biden administration is keeping more than 48,000 pages of records about Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson from senators reviewing her nomination, including documents about her time at the U.S. Sentencing Commission that she has made a central part of her professional story.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) is "hiding" records from Jackson's time as vice chair of the Sentencing Commission, where she championed leniency for child predators, says Michael Davis, former chief counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said Monday that 16,000 pages of substantive content has been released on Jackson, compared to the 48,000 pages withheld by the White House under the Presidential Records Act and FOIA exemptions.
...and...
"Durbin has refused a request by Republican senators to look at her records on the sentencing commission," Davis told "Just the News – Not Noise" on Monday, hours after Jackson's first day of testimony in front of the committee weighing her nomination to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.
Which signals that there is something they are trying to hide.
According to the Article3Project, Brown Jackson sentenced perverts, predators, and child molesters to less-than-recommended jail and prison time on a consistent basis.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
No Brainer!! Having to hide her history as a judge should mean automatic disqualification and dismissal for SCOTUS nominee.
Durbin Dick Head....what you cover up....WTF
If you vote for her you’re a pedo who loves pedos. Nuff said!
Were it me, regardless of which party doing this, I would vote no purely based on this action. What are you trying to hide, indeed.
of course, there is no end to the stupidity and corruption on the Hill, so no one there will do the same thing.
But he let a flake woman with no proof claim he raped her 35 yrs ago and another one accuse him of gang rape.
I’d say no voting until Durbin coughs up the records but knowing our GOP that idea is laughable.
This is a job interview, and the hiring manager wants to know details about her experience. If that info cannot be shared, there’s something being hid and she’s disqualified.
Turban Durbin strikes again. Someone must have dirt on him for him to be openly covering up a judicial record. SCUM
Hide? It is what Democrats do. Is this any different that hiding data on COVID? How about 1/6 evidence? Or sticking their heads in the sand over election fraud. Or the latest, the Haiti bill, striped of its language and replaced with the omnibus spending bill so American and probably most congresscritters had no idea what money was being spent.
Limpdick Durbin would hide anything to get the black vote. That is what this is all about.
“The Senate needs to toss this airhead bimbo”
Airhead? Bimbo?
WooHoo. Isn’t that supposed to be a phrase reserved for blonds? I know damn good & well Ketanji Brown Jackson ain’t blond.
What the f—k kind of a name is Ketanji? Upper or Lower Slobovian?
Why hide her judicial record?
To hide her judicial record. That is why.
Ted Cruz was sensational this afternoon. He caught KBJ in outright lies about Critical Race Theory; showed that a private school in DC where she is a member of the board of trustees teaches CRT to children as young as 4 years old.
Her nomination has to be in serious trouble now. She still has to face a murderer’s row of GOP heavy hitters such as Tom Cotton and John Kennedy.
If all GOP senators stick together and get Manchin to join them or abstain, she loses.
Blackburn grilled her on this as well. This nominee is a radical and an activist an should not be on the SCOTUS.
If she were a GOP candidate media would be going berserk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.