Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Historic Senate hearing set on Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme Court nomination
ABC News / Disney ^ | March 20, 2022 | ByDevin Dwyer

Posted on 03/20/2022 7:51:49 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday opens a week of high-profile confirmation hearings for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court in its 233-year history.

While Democrats have the votes to confirm President Joe Biden's high court nominee on their own, the hearings could prove critical to the White House goal of securing at least some Republican support and shoring up the court's credibility.

The spotlight on a historic nominee -- and the court itself during such a consequential term of cases -- is also an opportunity for both political parties to appeal to key voting constituencies ahead of the midterm campaign season.

Jackson, 51, who currently sits on the nation's second most powerful court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, will face questions from the committee's 11 Republicans and 11 Democrats over two days, starting Tuesday.

Republicans have signaled a desire to scrutinize the substance of Jackson's record while avoiding the types of personal inquires they opposed in other recent confirmations.

Several GOP senators have telegraphed plans to question Jackson's defense of detainees at Guantanamo Bay as a private defense attorney; her support of reduced sentences for convicted drug offenders; and the backing of her nomination by outside progressive advocacy groups.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: historic; journalism; ketanjibrownjackson; paulryan; press; propaganda; scotus; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2022 7:51:49 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

She’s a Biden Judge.

[Traitor Roberts take note....]


2 posted on 03/20/2022 7:53:58 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

She’ll be out by lunch.


3 posted on 03/20/2022 7:53:59 AM PDT by dblshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Nothing historic about it. She will be met with little to no resistance.


4 posted on 03/20/2022 7:54:03 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The milquetoast rhinos will only toss her softballs. No rigorous and meaningful scrutiny about her character (cue MLK speech). Anyone who asks hardball questions we already know is a racist.


5 posted on 03/20/2022 7:54:45 AM PDT by KierkegaardMAN (I never engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Today everything is “historic”


6 posted on 03/20/2022 7:57:07 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
While Democrats have the votes to confirm President Joe Biden's high court nominee on their own...

This affirmative action appointment is so bad that they could easily have a defection or two, then they don't have the votes.

7 posted on 03/20/2022 7:57:11 AM PDT by fireman15 (Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Drop her like a sack of potatoes.


8 posted on 03/20/2022 7:59:10 AM PDT by Karliner (Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Well, since her writings sound quite pro-paedo, she is obviously IN with this WHouse; and the LuggButt “community” will vilify anyone who even asks a question and demands an answer.


9 posted on 03/20/2022 7:59:25 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

Bookmark


10 posted on 03/20/2022 8:00:44 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

She better side with the dizzknee glbtqrpd’s or else. She is too ideologically set to the ‘prog’ side anyway but the usual republicrat suspects will probaby vote to confirm.


11 posted on 03/20/2022 8:02:26 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I think she’ll be an activist leftist judge who will be bad for the country. But she’ll get a pass because she’s a minority.


12 posted on 03/20/2022 8:06:06 AM PDT by KittyKares (Trump put us in the room; now we're putting ourselves in the room. - Steve Bannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

“historic” implies if she’s not confirmed it’s just another glaring example of the oppressive white man holding the black woman down.

More of the retard vote.

Cows eating hamburgers.


13 posted on 03/20/2022 8:08:00 AM PDT by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

This is a freaking joke. What RINO, or any R for that matter, would NOT vote to approve the “first black woman” justice. Why, it is such an historic appointment, and it would be racist to vote her down. Nothing else matters. I want to throw up now.


14 posted on 03/20/2022 8:18:37 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If Rush were here, he might play the clips of a several media orgs repeating, “Historic!” or whatever is their word or phrase to praise this wacko.


15 posted on 03/20/2022 8:35:26 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obamawhy's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It’s a wash. Who cares.


16 posted on 03/20/2022 8:41:17 AM PDT by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN
You apparently missed Sen. Hawley's Twitter thread that pretty much demolished her chances?

This woman repeatedly voted to reduce sentences of those convicted of child pornography and pedophilia.

There'll be at least 5 Democrat Senators who'll vote no, if she doesn't withdraw from consideration first.

The optics of this is just horrible. Hawley did a brilliant job here, which removes the race/woman angle off the table.

17 posted on 03/20/2022 8:49:34 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (The GOP is the UN of US politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

No. The “court’s credibility” will only be further diminished with that lady as a SCJ.


18 posted on 03/20/2022 8:53:31 AM PDT by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
There'll be at least 5 Democrat Senators who'll vote no, if she doesn't withdraw from consideration first.

Nope. I bet she gets all 50 democrat Senators along with at least a few RINOs.

The media has already begun its unified all out push that anyone who opposes this "historic" nomination is nothing but a racist, sexist, homophobic white supremacist.

19 posted on 03/20/2022 9:14:22 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

She checks three of the most important boxes; black, female, liberal.

She’ll get all 50 Democrat votes, and several RINO’s like Romney, Collins, Murkowski, and probably Graham.


20 posted on 03/20/2022 9:15:12 AM PDT by Deo volente ("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson