Posted on 03/15/2022 3:50:02 PM PDT by zeestephen
Free Republic excerpt restrictions on USA Today
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Freedom of Assembly, assclowns.
Liberals were not concerned when Ruth Bader Ginsburg popped off her mouth. What she said on several occasions are unforgivable.
The Communist Party is not big on freedom of speech or assembly except to burn down cities.
Remove 8 of them. Cases will be decided 1 to 0, with Thomas writing the Majority opinion.
<sarc></sarc>
And if the left has a problem with it, call them racist.
Well, no doubt the democrats and the uniparty republicans and their ‘Cancel Culture’ allies in the media will be clamoring to make Justice Thomas resign from the Supreme Court, and for his wife to be arrested and executed for ‘treason’.
I’m sure they won’t stop there, either. Next they’ll be saying Trump should be arrested for attending his own rally! 🤣
Chuck Schumer THREATENED the court from outside its doors.
They should arrest anyone who thought about attending J6 protests, anyone who has since ridden by the Capitol and thought positive thoughts about those who were there.
In everyone who voted for Trump
Sounds like the Thomas family has their heads glued on
straight.
As for her not being there when Trump was, why in the Sam
Hell should she have to make that clear.
Trump did mention irregularities. Who wouldn’t, knowing
what he knew? Notice it’s sinful to mention crime, but it’s
not sinful to commit crimes?
Trump DID NOT incite those people. He urged them to go
down and protest PEACEFULLY.
That is never mentioned in the coverage.
I stopped reading at “false allegations of voter fraud.”
2020 was a stolen election. And anyone who tried to silence me for saying it can - well, I don’t want to be sent to time out.
Put Biden’s SCOTUS nominees through the same high tech lynching then Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden put Clarence Thomas through.
Bart Jansen and John Fritze are basically lynching Clarence Thomas by proxy, using his wife as the rope. The USA Today can either fire them, or by inaction, admit to being a Klan newspaper, and sexist pigs on top of it. Does Vivi Thomas have a right to independent political opinions and thoughts, or is she a slave to her husband? It’s obvious where USA Today stands on womens’ rights.
Did Clarence not keep his wife in line? The leftists are now demanding him to domineer over her personal life. Very 1950s.
She needs to double down.
So what!
IDGAF!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.