Skip to comments.
This Supreme Court Case Could Destroy Water Protections
Gizmodo ^
| Jan 26, 2022
| Molly Taft
Posted on 01/26/2022 5:44:44 PM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The court is not in an ultra conservative stage.
What crapola.
2
posted on
01/26/2022 5:47:03 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
“There’s a range of outcomes [to the case], all of which are bad,” said Dave Owen, a professor of environmental law at the University of Califonia, Hastings. That tells me that the government over-stepped its bounds in an egregious way and any halfway decent court will have no choice but to reign in the regulations.
3
posted on
01/26/2022 5:49:01 PM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
("If you see something, say something"? I see people dying from vaccines.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
“Science, of course” Of course!
It always cracks me up when the journalisiming gets this strong.
4
posted on
01/26/2022 5:52:28 PM PST
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
“Science, of course” Of course!
It always cracks me up when the journalisiming gets this strong.
5
posted on
01/26/2022 5:52:32 PM PST
by
absalom01
(You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
To: Secret Agent Man
6
posted on
01/26/2022 5:57:10 PM PST
by
sauropod
(Whom the gods would destroy they first make mad. Life is risk, your highness.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
By “navigable waterways”, Congress never meant to allow the EPA authority to regulate every mudhole, cattle pond, and dry creek bed in the US.
7
posted on
01/26/2022 6:00:50 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal is a blood-thirsty fascist yearning to be free of current societal constraints.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
And thanks to the incredibly conservative makeup of the Supreme Court ... LOL!
8
posted on
01/26/2022 6:04:11 PM PST
by
KevinB
(''...and to the Banana Republic for which it stands ...")
To: Blood of Tyrants
It is how the government takes your land and does not pay you....like the endangered species act....like New York State banning fracking..
9
posted on
01/26/2022 6:05:38 PM PST
by
Hojczyk
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Well, guess what? They’re only interpreting two words in a law. If Congress wished to make it clearer, they have the power to do so.
To: Blood of Tyrants
True. Have a wet year and get water in a low spot in your pasture. Ka -Ching! Wet land! Then the effing Feds show up like a bad STD. Oh yeah, just as hard to get rid of too. A lot in this law is bad. The FEDS make it worse.
To: Blood of Tyrants
Fairy shrimp in the hoof prints
12
posted on
01/26/2022 6:16:54 PM PST
by
ptsal
(Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Don’t worry about the water shed, all the Liberal tears over this case will recharge the water shed with Unicorn H2O, which the Fairy Queen will bless for all creatures bid and small…..
13
posted on
01/26/2022 6:20:17 PM PST
by
Lockbox
(politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
To: Blood of Tyrants
By “navigable waterways”, Congress never meant to allow the EPA authority to regulate every mudhole, cattle pond, and dry creek bed in the US.
That depends upon who controlled Congress at that time, and who would benefit from the Act. (Never underestimate the corruption in government; if nothing else, it helped contribute to a whole bunch of new bureaucrats, which is never a good thing.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
It would be great to overturn this over reaching regulation.
I believe it will allow common sense to prevail.
15
posted on
01/26/2022 6:22:31 PM PST
by
G Larry
(The "Racism" charge is code for "No Intelligent Argument")
To: Secret Agent Man
It’s bias and propaganda, all day, every day. When the game of Cowboys and demo-commies starts, the media should be the first demo-commies in the game.
16
posted on
01/26/2022 6:27:00 PM PST
by
curious7
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The issue is never the issue.
The Revolution is always the issue.
17
posted on
01/26/2022 6:30:04 PM PST
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Trump rolled back WOTUS provisions. Too bad Congress couldn’t pass a law banning the largest Federal land grab in history h/t Zippy Duval
18
posted on
01/26/2022 6:34:55 PM PST
by
griswold3
(When chaos serves the State, the State will encourage chaos)
To: KevinB
Well at least the author didn’t the Romneyesque description “severely conservative” for the USSC.
19
posted on
01/26/2022 6:35:13 PM PST
by
princeofdarkness
(HONEST officials should never oppose an election audit. If they do, then they are NOT HONEST.)
To: KevinB
Well at least the author didn’t use the Romneyesque description “severely conservative” for the USSC.
20
posted on
01/26/2022 6:35:37 PM PST
by
princeofdarkness
(HONEST officials should never oppose an election audit. If they do, then they are NOT HONEST.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson