Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jen Psaki Just Took Rumors About Kamala Harris Becoming a Supreme Court Justice to the Next Level
Becker News ^ | 01/26/22 | Kyle Becker

Posted on 01/26/2022 12:28:04 PM PST by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 next last
To: frank ballenger
Could he somehow, improbably, against the odds find another such person for the court? Another storybook?

It would be another miracle.

141 posted on 01/26/2022 1:53:20 PM PST by 1Old Pro (Let's make crime illegal again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Can you imagine that cackling during oral arguments?


142 posted on 01/26/2022 1:53:32 PM PST by ez ("Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is." - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Oh......how...reassuring........


143 posted on 01/26/2022 1:57:08 PM PST by Scarlett156 (Someone with "comedian" on his social media profile is invariably a self-hating sadistic loser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Since when has appropriateness for the job mattered to the dems.?


144 posted on 01/26/2022 1:58:10 PM PST by Churchillspirit (9/11/2001 and 9/11/2012: NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Harris is inappropriate for the role.”

While I agree with you, Biden’s singular qualification seems to be that the next justice be a “woman of color”.


145 posted on 01/26/2022 1:59:53 PM PST by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buwaya

Nope ... he’s not African black, but a dark Hispanic


146 posted on 01/26/2022 2:04:12 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

She’s inappropriate for vice president, but that didn’t stop them, did it?


147 posted on 01/26/2022 2:04:43 PM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Who cares who he picks....it will be a liberal idiot and won't change anything because they are replacing a liberal idiot!!!!
148 posted on 01/26/2022 2:05:25 PM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
She has no legal background.
Plus she has filed bankruptcy.

But has she raped anyone back in college? That's the dividing line.

149 posted on 01/26/2022 2:06:11 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Chinese communism will look different once the masks come off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

If sh!tmuffin is stupid enough to take sh!tlery as his vp, then he deserves his upcoming scheduled suicide.


150 posted on 01/26/2022 2:06:15 PM PST by sitetest (Professional patient. No longer mostly dead. Again. It's getting to be a habit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Heh, just think how low the Supreme Court’s already laughable reputation will sink when when the HO gets in there.


151 posted on 01/26/2022 2:07:18 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
> It’s never going to happen. Harris is inappropriate for the role.

You are right, she is a heterosexual ...

152 posted on 01/26/2022 2:07:59 PM PST by SecondAmendment (This just proves my latest theory ... LEFTISTS RUIN EVERYTHING !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

There is an excellent summary of the complications in the trash sheet leftist rag Time Magazine, unfortunately.

I won’t post a link.

Brief quote here:
Why does this matter? If all 11 Republican members of the Judiciary Committee oppose Biden’s pick and all 11 Democrats back her, the nomination goes inert. (A pretty safe bet in a committee where at least half of the Republican members have White House ambitions of their own.) The nomination doesn’t die, but it does get parked until a lawmaker—historically, the Leader of the party—brings it to the floor for four hours of debate.

A majority of the Senate—51 votes, typically—can then put debate about the issue on the calendar for the next day. But that’s the last easy part. When the potential pick comes to the floor again, it’s not as a nomination. At that point, it’s a motion to discharge, a cloture motion that requires 60 votes. In other words, 10 Republicans would have to resurrect the nomination of someone already blocked in the Judiciary Committee.

Given this is an election year and Republicans have historically shown they’re not willing to give Democrats any wins on the Supreme Court in such a politically charged environment, there’s a good chance that Biden’s nominee spends her summer waiting for invites that never come from GOP lawmakers asking her in for typically cordial and informal coffees.

So, yes, Biden may get to nominate a pick for the Supreme Court. But there’s no guarantee that the full Senate will take it up. After all, McConnell successfully rejected Merrick Garland’s nomination in 2016 and waited for Donald Trump to win the White House to install a replacement for Antonin Scalia. McConnell narrowly carved out selected history and dug his heels in that he wouldn’t bring Garland up for a vote. There was simply nothing Democrats could do about it.

And given the rules of the Senate as they stand, a resolute Republican Party can pull a sequel to the Garland nomination. Sure, the Democrats could try to change the power-sharing agreement, but as the debate on voting rights showed us in recent weeks, one hold-out voice among Democrats in favor of the filibuster can tank the plan with little consequence. Which means all of the odds-making about who might get the call from White House Counsel in the coming days, who might get tapped to sherpa the nomination through the Senate or even what this means for the next term are all likely for naught. Republicans, should they want to, can sink this nominee. And if history is predictive, that’s exactly what they’ll do.
Philip Elliott, Jan 26, 2022.


153 posted on 01/26/2022 2:08:57 PM PST by frank ballenger (You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit

It always has. Just maybe not the way you think. They don’t just nominate any lawyer. They nominate people with certain experience, and you can expect a lot of pushback if it’s not there.


154 posted on 01/26/2022 2:15:05 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

In reality, there are almost no qualifications to be VP. You could be a rutabaga.


155 posted on 01/26/2022 2:15:51 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

If sh!tmuffin nominates sh!tlery to be vp and she is confirmed by congress, and then if President Trump regains the presidency in the 2024 election, sh!tlery will no longer be in office once President Trump takes the oath of office on Jan 20, 2025. There will be no need to “nominate her replacement,” as she will once again be a private citizen and not be holding any office from which she can leave due to ill health.


156 posted on 01/26/2022 2:16:08 PM PST by sitetest (Professional patient. No longer mostly dead. Again. It's getting to be a habit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Agree completely. I just don’t think we are dealing with chess players here. I’m not sure they actually care about the institution, or the Constitution, etc.


157 posted on 01/26/2022 2:16:30 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

This article is VERY COOL!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/why-biden-is-never-going-to-nominate-vp-kamala-harris-to-the-supreme-court/ar-AATbb6k


158 posted on 01/26/2022 2:17:18 PM PST by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Every major personnel move and appointment was gamed-out by the senior-level Democrat Party operatives before Bernie and Mayor Pete were forced out of the primaries. That was the price Joe paid to be called ‘President’.


159 posted on 01/26/2022 2:17:41 PM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I know he isnt dumb...but kamala can do the same thing since thomas already showed the way in the current era.


160 posted on 01/26/2022 2:18:05 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson