Posted on 01/17/2022 10:04:33 AM PST by PoliticallyShort
The family of Malik Faisal Akram, the Islamic jihadi from Britain who took hostages in Congregation Beth Israel synagogue in Colleyville, Texas, Saturday, has “demanded to know how he was allowed into America despite a long criminal record,” says the UK’s Daily Mail. More than just his family should be asking this question. How was this man able to storm a synagogue in Texas and take people hostage at gunpoint when he shouldn’t have been allowed into the United States in the first place? If anything shows how broken our immigration system is under the regime of Biden’s handlers, it is this entire episode.
Malik Faisal Akram’s brother Gulbar asked: “He’s known to police. Got a criminal record. How was he allowed to get a visa and acquire a gun?” Yeah. U.S. immigration law states that “any alien convicted of 2 or more offenses (other than purely political offenses), regardless of whether the conviction was in a single trial or whether the offenses arose from a single scheme of misconduct and regardless of whether the offenses involved moral turpitude, for which the aggregate sentences to confinement were 5 years or more is inadmissible” to the United States. It has not been revealed how many convictions Malik Faisal Akram has, but presumably a “long criminal record” involves more than two. Does Akram’s “long criminal record” involve no convictions, or only one? Or did he get admitted to the United States by some official who was skirting the law? Is Old Joe Biden’s immigration system so broken at this point that essentially anyone, anyone at all, no matter what kind of criminal record he has, can get into the country?
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Why did he chose Texas? Did he think that Southerners would be fine with someone taking hostages, regardless of their religion? He must read The Guardian.
Potential Democrat voter. Keeping him out would have been voter suppression.
BIDEN and Democrats have to keep his Muslim voter base appeased. No such stories have been allowed on Biden propaganda news outlets.
Nearly 70% American-Muslims have voted for Joe Biden
Arab News
@arabnews
More than one million American Muslims participated in the #2020USelection, with nearly 70 percent voting for Joe Biden, an exit poll shows
https://www.globalvillagespace.com/nearly-70-american-muslims-have-voted-for-joe-biden-survey/
Because they needed a distraction from Big T’s AZ rally. 😏
The jihadist in the immigration office rubber stamps their jihadist buddies.
That was actually my first thought
Your first thought is usually the most accurate.
Does U.S. Customs have access to U.K. criminal records?
Why? Other than OANN or Newsmax who bothered covering it?
Everybody knows that the Moslems only attack Republicans.
They would never attack when Democrats are in charge.
Fox Nation!
Libtards will allow anyone free access to harm citizens 🤪
We rather kiss Jihadi ass than recognize them as terrorists. It’s our custom.
because, Brandon...
Was he an FBI plant?
Because he was vaccinated?
FBI: We can’t answer that.
Because he registered as a Democrat?
And he wasn’t a white male…the Feds think that the only people to be concerned about are straight white males.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.