To my mind the ruling is less important than the opinion.
The opinion might give us an indication of how far Deep State is willing to go...
Maybe the justice’s lies will rule the day? /s
Oh wonderful. 9 deep state, unelected lawyers get to tell us what the Constitution really says even though we can read it for ourselves and understand it ourselves. Only their “interpretations” matter.
“Chief Justice John Roberts ... “
Nothing they do would surprise me, given that information. Owned and operated by the deep state.
I’ve got a bad feeling about this.
I really should not be on the edge of my seat here.
Conservative court... mandating an experimental and ineffective therapy on individuals so the “collective” feels better.
Should be a slam dunk, yet I’m worried.
And it will be 6-3 against any mandate. Power is in the States.
I see the Court as three factions. Unfortunately, the divide results in a rubber stamp of pretty much anything the Government wants to do. I would be shocked at a ruling against the vax mandate.
Faction 1: the Liberal three. Law schma, here is the result we want, here is the result we get. Our law clerks will make up some of that law schit to say whatever we want the law to be.
Faction 2: the Coward, his femme bot sock puppet and the Scorned accused sexual assaulter desperate for re-admission into the Deep State club. Making all the right noises as if they were principled jurists but at the end of the day liking for the dodge to avoid having to decide and, hence, preserving the status quo.
Faction 3: the Jurists- show us the facts, law, and precedent. Sometimes with that your side will lose and sometimes it will win. But it will be based on the law and not political philosophy.
I suspect they'll punt and say No to feds and suggest this is a matter for the states to decide.
Sotomayer showed she has no business anywhere near decisions affecting the rest of the country. Her offering total lies as her basis of support of mandates tells you she is a political tool for the left.
Mandates for everyone is not going to be supported today. Maybe health care workers will have to be vaxxed, but on a strict basis of law, this should be a no-brainer to uphold the stay on ALL the mandates, Federal and local.
Why should there be federal funding for something that’s unconstitutional?
Please don’t bollix the title.
The title of the news story at KOMO is “Court watch: Supreme Court set to issue opinions Thursday”
There’s nothing in the title about vaccine mandates.
That' how this decision will go, it's the easy way to cop out of their responsibility.
For later.
L
I can see John Roberts declaring the “vaccine” a TAX that can’t be avoided
Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch are no mandate. Not sure about Kavanaugh and Barrett
Meanwhile, they’re building concrete barriers around the White House. Something is up....and it ain’t good.
They’re not allowed to ask my vaccination status in my state, so I’m not going to tell them.
Most of the Justices (yes, including Roberts) were pretty tough on Administration lawyers trying to defend the mandates. Big issue is whether or not the Fed. Gov’t can dip down to the local level to force madates on private businesses through what are basically executive orders with no action from Congress.
There seems to be a good chance the Court rules against the mandates in general. They may uphold Federal power over Federal employees but the mandates on businesses, which are crucial to what Biden is pushing for, will probably fall.
It will be a victory for conservatives and the American people IF the Court quashes mandates for private businesses (although the usual Nattering Nabobs of Negativism will show up and try to spin it as a victory for the Deep State).