Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: Red Badger
The dementia idiot has no limits to his expected power.
To: Red Badger
As long as Sinema and/or Manchin hold out, there will be no rule change. Thus far, they have been adamant about not changing the filibuster.
That we have to hold hope in two democrats is telling of where we are.
3 posted on
12/23/2021 6:29:01 AM PST by
Nathan _in_Arkansas
(Hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats. )
To: Red Badger
Scummee says all 50 Dems support it??
4 posted on
12/23/2021 6:30:56 AM PST by
Sacajaweau
( )
To: Red Badger
Nice try Joe. Back to bed.
To: Red Badger
It’s a voting fraud bill. The Democrats know that the democratic process will shut them out and they’re desperate to change it in their favor.
6 posted on
12/23/2021 6:32:06 AM PST by
Spok
To: Red Badger
Anyone in DC who claims that personally Joe’s really a nice guy is dead to me.
Lunchbox Joe, with his cohorts, are the worst kind of evil garbage.
7 posted on
12/23/2021 6:32:23 AM PST by
skeeter
To: Red Badger
Be careful what you ask for. If you change this, and the REPS take power in 2024, Dems will be begging for the 60 votes again.
8 posted on
12/23/2021 6:32:31 AM PST by
realcleanguy
(quickly things are falling apart, now that the )
To: Red Badger
By any means necessary. Heil Brandon!
To: Red Badger
Biden is dangerous to the nation.
To: Red Badger
Let me fix the headline for Newsmax: Like the 2020 Election, Democrats Eyeing Federal Election Takeover Through Cheating and Lawlessness”
11 posted on
12/23/2021 6:36:52 AM PST by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: Red Badger
Not to mention that silly constitution which delegates voting laws to the states, not the feds.
Well, says Chuck, ‘we can pack the court and get the Supremes blessing in order to change that silly provision.’....
....except packing requires killing the filibuster, too.
When will the establishment Rs acknowledge the Ds endgame ?
14 posted on
12/23/2021 6:42:29 AM PST by
chiller
(Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'm going ahead.)
To: Red Badger
Go ahead. Change the Filibuster.
Remember that, as things currently stand, the ‘Pubbies look good to win both the House and Senate.
15 posted on
12/23/2021 6:47:24 AM PST by
Little Ray
(Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
To: Red Badger
I want a Voting Rights Bill for Legitimate Registered voters:
The Right To Not Have Our Votes Diluted By Fraudulent Votes.
16 posted on
12/23/2021 6:47:57 AM PST by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: Red Badger
Kinda sounds like a threat to me...
17 posted on
12/23/2021 6:48:24 AM PST by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
To: Red Badger
18 posted on
12/23/2021 6:49:24 AM PST by
Mouton
(The enemy of the people is the media )
To: Red Badger
Biden said. "Change the Senate rules to accommodate [a] major piece of legislation without requiring 60 votes." Until the Repubs take back the Senate. Them the Dems will want the filibuster back...
20 posted on
12/23/2021 6:51:33 AM PST by
jeffc
(Let's Go Brandon!)
To: Red Badger
Didn’t they learn from Harry Reid that changing filibuster rules is a two edged sword?
21 posted on
12/23/2021 6:51:44 AM PST by
G Larry
(The "Racism" charge is code for "No Intelligent Argument")
To: Red Badger
Biden Makes It Clear: Change Filibuster Rules to Pass Voting CHEATING Rights Bill There, fixed it.
23 posted on
12/23/2021 6:58:37 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Red Badger
If the Republicans get control of the house and senate, you can believe that they would reinstate any filibuster rule that was done away with right now. They would do it in the name of “reaching across the aisle.“
24 posted on
12/23/2021 6:58:40 AM PST by
refreshed
(But we preach Christ crucified... 1 Corinthians 1:23)
To: Red Badger
Unconstitutional through and through. The Constitution permits states to set their own election laws, regulations, and processes. SCOTUS would throw out the ‘RATS illegal bill.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson