Posted on 12/19/2021 4:54:08 AM PST by Kaslin
Each year around Christmas, an insidious tradition takes place that undermines the very nature of the holiday and biblical history, which undermines the birth of Jesus, Christianity, and Jewish tradition from which Jesus and Christianity come.
Efforts to propagate anti-biblical malicious lies grow stronger and more brazen each year. It’s like Christmas in Fantasyland: a campaign of theological deception, whose goal is to erase Jewish history from Israel, and Israel from the map. Denying and trying to erase the centrality of Judaism to Israel, and the State of Israel, is bad and ridiculous enough. But doing so also undermines the origin of Christianity, the celebration of Jesus’ birth, and is why Jews and Christians should be alarmed and concerned.
For generations, Palestinian Arabs have led the charge to delegitimize Israel. A major tactic is by declaring that Jews have no history in Israel, despite biblical, archeological, and other historic accounts. By delegitimizing Jewish centrality and history in Israel, it’s a slippery slope to more historical and theological revisionism. The “Palestinian gift” at this season is saying that Jesus was not a Jew, but a “Palestinian.” Some say he’s “the first Palestinian,” a “Palestinian messenger,” “the great–grandfather of the Palestinian people.” Others refer to him as a “the first Palestinian martyr.” Other than being false, why is this so bad?
The New Testament is unambiguous, and rich with accounts of Jesus being a Jew. It describes his lineage, his participating in countless Jewish rituals, debating and preaching Jewish law, worshiping in the Temple, and the Last Supper being a Passover seder (not a Ramadan break fast). When one propagates the lie of Jesus being a “Palestinian,” it is not just historically inaccurate, but denies the foundation of Christianity.
If the New Testament were not good enough to dispel the lie of “Jesus the Palestinian,” historically there’s irrefutable evidence as well. The fact is that it wasn’t until a century after the crucifixion of Jesus, when the Jews fought Roman occupation (known as the Bar Kokhba Revolt), that the term “Palestine” was applied to the Land of Israel. Only after the Romans defeated the Jews in 135 did they rename the Land of Israel “Palestina” to punish and humiliate the Jews. The Romans hijacked the proper Jewish (and biblical) name, Judea, replacing it with the name of an ancient enemy of the Jews as if to complete the vanquishing of the Land and its People.
Because the name “Palestine” only came into being 100 years after his crucifixion, it is not possible that Jesus was a “Palestinian.” Not only that, Jesus would never have even heard that term. He’d have been just as likely to know about Martians, or Vulcans.
Claiming Jesus as a “Palestinian,” the Palestinian Authority gives voice to their national aspiration, not by building their own society, but by undermining Israel and its legitimacy. If actual historical and biblical facts don’t jive with their narrative, no problem. They just change the truth. There’s very little that the Palestinian Authority does from inciting, celebrating, and funding terrorism, to promoting the myth of Jesus as a “Palestinian” that is not meant to undermine Israel.
By hijacking Jesus this way, they ascribe to him characteristics of being a “Palestinian terrorist.” Indeed, the Arabic for martyr, shahid, is commonly used posthumously to “honor” those who have died in propagating terror or jihad, holy war, sacrificing his or her life for their Islamic beliefs. In the “Palestinian” case, that’s about fighting Israel and murdering Israelis. That would make Jesus a murderer of his own people. Ultimately, it's a lie of biblical proportions that’s a hybrid between Palestinian nationalism and the ultimate Islamic replacement theology.
I’m no theologian and, as an Orthodox Jew, certainly no expert in Christianity or the Gospels. However, I know a dangerous and offensive ambush on both Judaism and Christianity when I see it. When today’s “Palestinians” erase and rewrite whole sections of scripture that are the foundation of Judaism and Christianity, it must be called out.
There are many, many examples of this, but one of the best is when Palestinians say that there was never a Temple on the Temple Mount, the focal point of Biblical Jerusalem. This landmark was destroyed, rebuilt, destroyed again in the year 70 CE, and replaced by two mosques hundreds of years later, to spread the dominance of Islam over Jerusalem, which is never mentioned in the Koran, as an Islamic city.
The denial of the Temple’s very existence also undermines Jews and Christians who share so much in common over the foundation of our respective faiths. This is one egregious example, but one doesn’t have to look too hard to find plenty more, the same way one doesn’t have to dig too deep in Jerusalem to find archeological remains, evidence of the reality we know from the Bible.
The awakening in the past century of Christians who understand the biblical injunction to bless Israel, and who know that Israel’s rebirth is fulfillment of prophecy, needs to be met with open arms by Jews, and reciprocated. When a “Palestinian” leader refers to Jesus as a “Palestinian,” it’s a combination of historic revisionism and cultural appropriation that’s an affront to the foundation of Christianity.
In modern times, when the British took control of Palestine from the Ottomans it was governed under what was known as the British Mandate. Then, those who were referred to as Palestinian were the Jews. Jewish stamps, coins, and newspapers said “Palestine,” and nobody cared. Arabs in neighboring countries never called themselves Palestinians, but rather Syrians, Lebanese, Jordanians, Egyptians, etc.
Today, nobody questions the use of the word “Palestine” and that is a shame. It makes it that much easier to hijack the narrative when nobody cares or knows better. Pretending that the land of the Bible is Palestine, not Israel, that Jesus is a Palestinian, not a Jew, that Israel’s rebirth is a catastrophe, not fulfillment of prophesy, the Jewish people are illegal occupiers, not indigenous and rightful owners, are all interrelated, twisted, and false.
Call me crazy, but if I am trying to build a nation, I’d do so on a strong positive foundation, not on trying to erase another. Replacing undeniable Jewish connections to the Land over thousands of years, and creating an imaginary history of Palestinians in place of Jews, and Jesus as a Palestinian, is a sinister form of replacement theology that undermines Judaism and Christianity and must be taught against and resisted at every opportunity.
Cancel culture. Much like replacing George Washington with Fidel Castro or che
The only place with “Palestine” as a part of it’s name was the old name of Jordan, “Trans-Jordanian Palestine”. Similarly a lot of the people who identify as “Palestinian” have Jordanian ancestry.
Palestine is a fictional construct meant to deprive Jews of their ancestral homeland.
CC
Islam holds a “fun house mirror” to the Biblical characters, including Jesus. This just takes it into a bit further distortion.
Israel (and Judea) have been “cancelled” before. It happens when the citizens become apostate. Then later they are restored.
Thing is, I can’t find this “cancelling” (if this current restoration is truly the restoration prophesied) in the Scriptures, so it probably won’t be successful, or it plays out much differently. Doesn’t help that prophesy seems to be fulfilled before it can be discerned many(most?) times.
Scary times if you don’t know where you’re going when you’re dead and gone.
It’s not at all good that current US leadership is showing us their hand in being against Israel, as that never pans out well for nations who choose so poorly.
Not according to the Romans To them He was the King of the Jews ...
Even the Jews said to say He said he was the King of the Jews ...
The LORD Jesus Christ never called Himself ‘Palestinian’
Utter nonsense.
When you start getting away from the texts you start moving into error.
I would ask the Orthodox Jewish author if the lie that Jesus was a Palestinian is any worse than the lie of Muslims & Jews denying the New Testament account of Jesus’ life, death, resurrection and Him being the Jewish and world’s Messiah?
My friend, both the Palestinian and J_wish re-branding of Jesus are non-Biblical. Order the book Jesus Was Not a J_w: An Epistle to the Gentiles written in 1936 by Jacob Elon Conner, PhD, who was an American in New York. Jesus was a Galilean which is entirely different than a J_w or a Palestinian, as they were the original Gentiles.
Every Christian I speak with tells me that Jesus was a J_w. Well, Jesus lived in a Judaic - Greek society, but Galilee in the time of Jesus was different ethnically, culturally and economically. That Jesus was a Gentile is corroborated in Conner’s book by the Talmud, by the Roman-J_wish historian Josephus, and the New Testament scriptures themselves. The Roman Emperor Julian wrote a book Against the Galileans and did not use the term Christian.
I’m afraid to tell you this but the J_ws have ripped off Jesus as one of them. This has economic benefits with just every Christian church I know of involved in tourism to Israel (when oddly the Christian church started in Antioch, Turkey).
Ebionitism is a heresy upheld by the Ebionites that Jesus was mortal and adhered to J_wish Law. Ebionites were poor Jews who believed in vegetarianism and thus rejected animal sacrifices. The early Christian Church considered Ebionites as synonymous with Nazarenes. They do not believe in the Risen Christ.
I would venture to say all Protestant American Christian churches believes in a heresy that Jesus was a J_w.
In 1984, I spent some time in bethlehem. It was mostly Christian back then and quite nice.
I hear it’s not quite the same anymore (sigh).
Correct.
If Palestinians followed teachings of Jesus, they wouldn’t be Muslims.
Sounds like Christian Identity stuff to me. I just downloaded a PDF of the book, so I’ll look at it and know for sure. I am interested in seeing what he does with the genealogies, Jesus’ presentation in the Temple, his teaching in the Temple, his keeping of the Passover, his trial by the Jewish authotities, etc.
Same story most places where Muslims rule mixed populations.
Some rulers are relatively tolerant, and some rulers are vicious persecuters.
“Jesus was a Galilean”
Matthew 2 KJV
2 Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem.
It's the leftist way.
"It's the leftist way."
My question: Why are you trying to build a nation from the safety and security of another nation? Hasn't the USA helped Israel enough? What ELSE do we owe them? If the concentration camps are real, if the persecutions are real, then the US should be - or so I would think - left out of the guilt loop. (And didn't that Donald Trump guy bend over backwards to help them? And don't we send them aid dollars to the tune of billions a year? Why are they still guilting us?) I guess that's more than one question. Oh well.
Seems likely that someone who doesn’t accept that Jesus was a descendant of Judah is not a Christian (at least not a traditional one).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.