Posted on 11/17/2021 10:29:58 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
The jury in the murder trial of Kyle Rittenhouse asked Judge Bruce Schroeder in the Kenosha County Court on Wednesday morning whether it should view video evidence in court or in private, prompting the judge to quip: “My nightmare has come true.”
The judge was referring to controversies over the video evidence presented by the prosecution during the trial, including whether zoomed-in images enhanced by artificial intelligence were admissible, and whether the prosecution withheld a higher resolution version of a video than the version that had been provided to the defense until the last day of the trial.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I agree with your post but I’m happy this is televised. If anyone still has faith in prosecutors and State evidence, this should change that.
I think everyone in the range of that camera should be arrested and questioned as possible witnesses.
Thank you!
LOGARITHMS?
Who did this?
Presumably someone in the DA's office, or maybe a FIB?
What is the person's name?
How did an algorithm become a "LOGARITHM"?
IF THEY'RE DUMB ENOUGH TO NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE, HOW CAN THEY BE SMART ENOUGH TO BE TRUSTED WITH COURT EVIDENCE?
He sure can...mistrial with prejudice.
The prosecutor should be disbarred for this.
Wow.....
if was an fbi drone. i suspect they have hours of footage on all the riots.
g) He also brandished a weapon in court during closing arguments & CLAIMED it was Kyle’s gun.
IT was NOT Kyle’s gun. It does NOT match the pics of Kyle’s gun. Look at the left hand grip on Kyle’s gun and also the sights on the rear of the barrel.....NOT the same gun as Binger brandished in court.
Last I heard-—Wis “Governor” has staged 500 NG troops-—OVER 60 miles from Kenosha.
Would take a MINIMUM of 90 minutes to load them up & arrive at any rioting...
Perhaps, but IF the Prosecution withheld evidence from the Defense-—THAT is major trouble.
that would explain why they presented the low def video when they had a high def copy
Wow. So he didn’t even say it was a similar gun that he was using in court to make a “point”?
Nope. I would be even more stubborn than any of them and they would be informed after the verdict that if they come after me, they will get the same as Kyle gave them.
Want vigilante justice? They get to see it first hand.
Vigilante justice may be all we have left after watching this circus of a trial. Kyle is NOT getting justice, this is a mistrial with prejudice.
100%
IF it goes to a retrial-—I see nothing wrong with the defense.
The real HOT POTATO will be in the DA’s office-—Who would want a retrial handed to them when it is evident the Prosecution lied /altered witness testimony found in discovery/and deliberately withheld evidence from the Defense???
does the defense need to follow up in oral argument after filing a written motion for mistrial with prejudice?
rekieta law talking lawyers seem to believe that...
is it the defense strategy to rely on written arguments all the way to appeals?
IMO-—NO evidence should be withheld by the judge.
I don’t know if they will re-try him locally. DOJ/FBI are waiting in the wings.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.