Posted on 11/10/2021 6:17:37 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress
Today they are expected to bring in a witness that will impeach Gaige Grosskreutz' testimony claiming that he did not say that he wished that he would have emptied his gun into Kyle Rittenhouse."
It should be a lively day on the stand.
I imagine that Kyle will continue to smile and look relaxed during the trial knowing that the prosecutors are total idiots, and that Judge Schroeder will continue to make humorous insertions from the bench (probably because he already knows how this trial will end with a directed verdict of innocence).
As Hawk Harrelson used to say, "Sit back, relax, and strap it down" cuz' no doubt this one is going to get jiggy.
all of a sudden my link is screwing up. this is the first time in a week of watching
I predict the state is going to look VERY bad if they try to attack this kid. He comes across as honest and innocent and it will blow back in their faces if they go on the attack.
all IMVHO
Interesting the police dept issued/loaned him his bullet proof vest.
I’ll admit to bias, but Kyle’s responses seem to indicate he is much older than his age - quite mature, yea?
I sure hope not! Praying!!
Grambo said that she held the rifle for Kyle when he did first Aid
Kyle said that’s why he had a strap for the rifle
State will go after that (although it really means nothing)
yes, he comes across like a genuinely good guy
That could be what the defense is ultimately going for.
Guilt or Innocence -- As I was taught: Lack of proof is not proof of innocence. With that in mind our system of Guilty/not Guilty is, IMHO, inadequate. I would favor a third option: Not Proven. That option would allow for a retrial if the prosecution fails to make it case, or additional evidence turns up later. I know, double indemnity would be a major and reasonable obstacle.
Directed Verdict -- From what I have observed and read of the case, Rittenhouse has a solid case for self-defense. But Jury's can be difficult. A directed verdict would focus all 'blame' from the far left onto one person: The Judge. It would take a very courageous judge to stand up and place that blame on himself.
The Jury -- Judges are usually very good at 'reading' a jury, thus the Judge's decision will hinge on that.
My personal prediction: Hung Jury and no retrial
The weapons charge is cared for with Kyle’s testimony. He left the weapon at his father’s house who lives in Kenosha.
Yet even the judge is saying this is a bad idea.
It might not work in Chicago or New York, but in Kenosha . . .
Folks in Kenosha are general, run of the mill, normal people. They are not accustomed to seeing 10-years-old with a murder sheet as long as Grosskreutz’ arm.
that’s not true. standard discussion when a defendant takes the stand.
Yes, but Kyle is doing very, very good and maybe it have rocked the prosecution. They’ll get a chance to regroup over lunch, tho.
My best advice to Kyle during cross is: “just tell the truth, talk to the jury, and keep your cool when they attempt the big GOTCHA!”
Where did you get that?
Atty Branca’s live comments;
Judge Schroeder instructing Kyle on risks of testifying, has right, State can cross-examine, etc. Any criminal history (none of that). Could be asked about other crimes, wrongs, prior events.
Judge Schroeder: Have right to not testify, wouldn’t be commented on.
Judge: Discussed with lawyers, think about what you are doing, think it’s the best thing, threatened or pressured, promised you anything, is your mind clear today, feeling OK, had anything alcoholic, drugs?
Kyle: No to all.
Richards: Consistent with advice of counsel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.