Molnupiravir:
Ivermectin:
Posted on 11/09/2021 10:40:02 AM PST by poinq
Video showing that Pfizers new anti-viral drug is virtually the same as Ivermectin. And interestingly they have research that their version of ivermectin works against COVID but they have no research that the real ivermectin works. Of course the real Ivermectin costs 10 cents a pill outside the US.
Correct. Paxlovid has significant side effects. Plus overstated effectiveness claims.
Ivermectin has multiple pathways for protection against virii, including but not limited to Covid-19. Ivermectin should also be effective vs. the common cold, and should be tested vs. influenza. It’s off-patent, cheap to manufacture, QA is relatively easy (QA for the various injections is Mongolian, see VAERS database for complications vs. lot number).
That said, Paxlovid should be used and useful in conjunction with Ivermectin, as the mechanism is different. Combo Ivermectin, zinc, Vitamins C and D3, aspirin, plus Paxlovid should decrease fatalities by 98% plus. I am not a doctor, and the FDA can take a leap. Find a doctor ahead of time.
well, one thing I do remember learning is antibotics can fight bacterial infection, but dont really attack the virus
We should immediately test it on horse and animal deworming and get it approved for that. Then let them try to market it to humans.
Don’t bother them with details!
The worst thing (for Big Pharma) the FDA can do is approve use of this new drug.
Your observation is correct. If they have an approved treatment, they should have to rescind the EUA for the ‘vaccine’ (which is not a vaccine as it does not give immunity)
Ivermectin: C48H74O14 (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Ivermectin)
Paxlovid: C23H32F3N5O4 (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/155903259)
Is this the one that costs $17.00 to make and they’re selling it for $700.00 plus ?
Molnupiravir:
Ivermectin:
Thanks, I understood part of that anyway.
Is it essentially Ivermectin or isn’t it? If it is, it has the protection of the US Patent Office for the next 17 years, while the original Ivermectin long ago lost that protection. If it is not, then what is this thread about?
bookmark
Is Foe Biden the CEO of Pfizer? Then why conflate it. Are you saying that Foe is setting a bad example for the young-uns? Of course he is. But the CEO of Pfizer is oking the undeserved patent of another’s work, violating the usefulness requirement (Ivermectin is useful, but a clone of it is not more useful than the original, so not patentable), and the non-obviousness requirement, if it’s obvious that this was already invented and is the same exact thing as the prior invention, and of course the novelty requirement. The CEO is not a young-un per se, and is responsible for his own actions. Does he also sniff hair, take showers with his nubile daughter, or take bribes from foreign countries?
“ Is it essentially Ivermectin or isn’t it?”
No, not even close.
“ If it is not, then what is this thread about?”
How should I know?
Haven’t watched the video, but prior research demonstrates that Pfizer’s drug uses an HIV drug - ritonavir, a pharmacokinetic enhancer - to boost it, allegedly to such a high effective rate that they cut the trials to push for FDA EUA.
I wonder how Ivermectin would work with ritonavir. /s
Well, they won’t until the price comes down to Ivermectin levels (>12 years).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.