Posted on 10/12/2021 8:27:14 PM PDT by MNJohnnie
The A-hole said:“The bottom line: We’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated co-workers.
So if I completely work remotely, I am exempt because there are no other co-workers.
What law is being passed to effect this? Or or we now on the fiat stage of the Empire?
And of course it ignores that the Vaccinated can carry and infect anyone just as the unvaccinated do. The vaunted vaccine is not a preventative and does not give immunity.
We have processes in this country. What we have now is the government being upset that the same agencies they created and funded are interfering with their goals and objectives!
The Biden administration is upset over their own organization's policies and procedures in approvals. You know, just like pipelines, dams, wind farms off Nantucket, and bringing drugs safely to public use.
So we now need to defund the FDA since Susan Rice and Joy Behar do the job better.
Up to the Courts now but yes sliding closer to the Death of the Republic and the rise of the Augusta
“The bottom line: We’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated co-workers.”
Real bright...
True that, the rise of the Augusta … but Kamal-hoe or Pe-lousy??
I don’t see how a 100 person standard is going to pass
as a requirement for all industries.
The annual hearing test is required by all employers, I believe. Just to receive the direct results of that test for an employee has many hurtles—the paperwork was color coded
at my last place of employment for privacy reasons. A process was in place to challenge the results etc...
Medical privacy law could be a problem.
OSHA rules have limitations in the airline industry—or don’t apply.
I think that right there will be a basis for some class action lawsuit - you are mandating a hardship for millions that is a straw-man in effect since the vaccinated carry the SAME viral load as unvaccinated.
As the story indicates, OSHA is relying on the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 as providing the statutory authority for this Emergency Temporary Standard. See, specifically, 29 U.S.C. sec. 655(c)(1).
I wish that all workers who work from home and have NO direct contact with employees or customers would be exempt from this.
[Private Employer COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate]
Good. Shutting down the whole economy is a brilliant idea.
Can’t work.
Can’t buy. (as a result)
Can’t sell. (you know it’s coming)
This should fail just on the merits that this “medical” mandate it is not even based on any “medical” science to back up their basis for the mandate itself. Just because you’re claiming that it’s for “health” reasons does not automatically make it so. PROVE IT IN COURT!
I suspect Newsome in CA is the likely candidate
Nasty an the Ho are too unlikeable. Octavin knew how to get public opinion on his side.
With the corrupt CA political machine and a fawning media propaganda system, in his pocket, Newsome is dangerous
““The bottom line: We’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated co-workers. “
Does this make ANY sense to anyone?
Jane Fonda said “Covid is God’s gift to the left.”
Sure she doesn’t believe in God.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/655
Well based on this there is going to be a whole lot of wrangling before this rule can even be mandated
Read the line you quoted again slowly. Does it make a lick of sense to you? Why should vaccinated persons need to be protected from the unvaccinated?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.