Skip to comments.
Federal Judge Rules Against Natural Immunity Claim Challenging COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate
The Epoch Times ^
| 10/1/21
| Jack Phillips
Posted on 10/10/2021 7:21:28 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
So much for science. He goes all the way back to 1905 to find a reason to deny her her rights. Judges can be bought the same as politicians or scientists.
To: Blood of Tyrants
We don’t believe in science.
2
posted on
10/10/2021 7:22:07 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong)
To: Blood of Tyrants
>> He goes all the way back to 1905 to find a reason to deny her her rights.
#ing scumbag
3
posted on
10/10/2021 7:24:31 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Total misapplication of the law. This is a Judge more worried about his PR with the Lying Media then the rule of law.
Jacobson vrs Mass specifically refers to the state legislature having this power. It has no bearing on a case of arbitrary executive action.
4
posted on
10/10/2021 7:25:34 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
To: Blood of Tyrants
A Federal Judge doesn’t have a license to practice medicine, or give advice about medical treatments.
5
posted on
10/10/2021 7:26:04 PM PDT
by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne )
To: Blood of Tyrants
That 1905 SCOTUS ruling is completely irrelevant to COVID or any other bioweaponized pandemics.
To: Blood of Tyrants
This is just all so evil.
7
posted on
10/10/2021 7:26:28 PM PDT
by
JoJo354
(JUST SAY NO to covid vaxx!)
To: Blood of Tyrants
“This Court must apply the law from the Supreme Court: Jacobson essentially applied rational basis review and found that the vaccine mandate was rational in ‘protect[ing] the public health and public safety,’” Maloney said in his order. “The Court cannot ignore this binding precedent.”
—
The judge is a moron who is fixated on the vaccine. The point of the vaccine is supposed to be immunity. This woman has immunity.
8
posted on
10/10/2021 7:26:28 PM PDT
by
Flick Lives
("Let's go, Brandon!")
To: Blood of Tyrants
Unwanted invasive procedures tend to violate one’s fundamental rights.
9
posted on
10/10/2021 7:26:42 PM PDT
by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: Blood of Tyrants
All Lawyers are scum
Most politicians are Lawyers by trade
All Judges are Lawyers in drag
10
posted on
10/10/2021 7:27:18 PM PDT
by
eyeamok
(founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
To: Blood of Tyrants
No worries for him.
He got The Saline, like the rest of the Elites.
11
posted on
10/10/2021 7:28:46 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: Flick Lives
“The point of the vaccine is SUPPOSED to be immunity.”
We all know that the point of the vaccine is NOT to get people immune. It is far more nefarious than that.
12
posted on
10/10/2021 7:29:33 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(When elections fail, we will either live under tyranny or rebel and throw it off.)
To: mass55th
13
posted on
10/10/2021 7:29:42 PM PDT
by
ronnie raygun
(Tell them what they want to hear with sincerity and do what is necessary )
To: Flick Lives
Judge also total ignored the part of the decision that sites the state legislative authority for this 1905 law.
No such legislative authority for mandatory Covid “vaccination” exists.
14
posted on
10/10/2021 7:29:49 PM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(They would have abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
To: JoJo354
we the people need to fix what is broken
15
posted on
10/10/2021 7:30:35 PM PDT
by
ronnie raygun
(Tell them what they want to hear with sincerity and do what is necessary )
To: Blood of Tyrants
Appointed by George W. Bush
To: Blood of Tyrants
17
posted on
10/10/2021 7:35:11 PM PDT
by
inchworm
(al )
To: Flick Lives
The judge is a moron who is fixated on the vaccine. In 20 or 30 years, when the psychologists look back on this and try to determine the different points in time when the discussion went off the tracks and no longer followed science, it will be noted that the most important point was when the discussion shifted from the goal of "herd immunity" to "mass vaccination".
This will be recognized as the point where the interests of the State (mass vaccination) diverged from the interests of the individual (immunity) and the relationship between the State and the individual formally ruptured.
18
posted on
10/10/2021 7:36:31 PM PDT
by
Captain Walker
("The side that has Truth gets Humor as a bonus.")
To: Blood of Tyrants
Madness. This should prove to everyone that this mandate is not benign and there is something more afoot than just health.
19
posted on
10/10/2021 7:38:37 PM PDT
by
OrangeHoof
(Chinese communism will look different once the masks come off.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
20
posted on
10/10/2021 7:39:56 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson