“This Court must apply the law from the Supreme Court: Jacobson essentially applied rational basis review and found that the vaccine mandate was rational in ‘protect[ing] the public health and public safety,’” Maloney said in his order. “The Court cannot ignore this binding precedent.”
—
The judge is a moron who is fixated on the vaccine. The point of the vaccine is supposed to be immunity. This woman has immunity.
“The point of the vaccine is SUPPOSED to be immunity.”
We all know that the point of the vaccine is NOT to get people immune. It is far more nefarious than that.
No such legislative authority for mandatory Covid “vaccination” exists.
In 20 or 30 years, when the psychologists look back on this and try to determine the different points in time when the discussion went off the tracks and no longer followed science, it will be noted that the most important point was when the discussion shifted from the goal of "herd immunity" to "mass vaccination".
This will be recognized as the point where the interests of the State (mass vaccination) diverged from the interests of the individual (immunity) and the relationship between the State and the individual formally ruptured.
He got his saline. He now presses the poison.
The judge is kicking the can down the road and KNOWS this asshattery will be overturned.
Good that he’s done it using a case with virtually nothing to do with the controversy before the court.