Professor Dorian Abbot
Posted on 10/05/2021 12:10:58 PM PDT by DeweyCA
Dorian Abbot is an associate professor in the Department of the Geophysical Sciences at the University of Chicago. He spends his days studying climate change and extrasolar planets. In a piece written for Bari Weiss’ Substack, Abbot says he’s never been particularly political. He uses an online tool to decide who to vote for. But a few years ago he began to have concerns about academic freedom. He says he mostly kept his thoughts to himself for several years but that changed last summer.
In the fall of 2020 I started advocating openly for academic freedom and merit-based evaluations. I recorded some short YouTube videos in which I argued for the importance of treating each person as an individual worthy of dignity and respect. In an academic context, that means giving everyone a fair and equal opportunity when they apply for a position as well as allowing them to express their opinions openly, even if you disagree with them.
The YouTube videos that Abbot created were taken down but you can see some of the content by following the link above. In any case, when Abbot spoke up a group of graduate students in his department coordinated a letter denouncing him. Here’s a sample of that:
The contents of Professor Dorian Abbot’s videos threaten the safety and belonging of all underrepresented groups within the department and serve to undermine Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion initiatives driven by the Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Coordination Team (EDICT). In these videos, he uses anecdotal evidence and poor statistics not supported by peer-reviewed literature about diversity. Although his views may not be unique within the department, his videos are a deliberate rejection of opportunities to participate in conversations within the Department of Geophysical Sciences and University of Chicago as a whole, and represent an aggressive act towards the research and teaching communities of which Professor Abbot is a member.
The denunciation letter went on to make a bunch of demands which would have made it difficult for Abbot to continue his work but all of those demands were put aside after University of Chicago President Robert Zimmer issued a letter last November defending free expression. That put an end to the first effort to cancel Abbot.
In August, Abbot spoke up again, this time in the form of an op-ed at Newsweek which he co-wrote with another academic from Stanford. That article directly challenged the premise of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion efforts on college campuses.
The underlying premise of DEI is that any statistical difference between group representation on campus and national averages reflects systemic injustice and discrimination by the university itself. The magnitude of the distortions is significant: for some job searches discrimination rises to the level of implicitly or explicitly excluding applicants from certain groups.
DEI violates the ethical and legal principle of equal treatment. It entails treating people as members of a group rather than as individuals, repeating the mistake that made possible the atrocities of the 20th century. It requires being willing to tell an applicant “I will ignore your merits and qualifications and deny you admission because you belong to the wrong group, and I have defined a more important social objective that justifies doing so.” It treats persons as merely means to an end, giving primacy to a statistic over the individuality of a human being.
That op-ed kicked off another round of calls on Twitter to punish Abbot for his “deeply problematic views” by deplatforming him. And that’s exactly what happened.
Sure enough, this strategy was employed when I was chosen to give the Carlson Lecture at MIT — a major honor in my field. It is an annual public talk given to a large audience and my topic was “climate and the potential for life on other planets.” On September 22, a new Twitter mob, composed of a group of MIT students, postdocs, and recent alumni, demanded that I be uninvited.
It worked. And quickly.
On September 30 the department chair at MIT called to tell me that they would be cancelling the Carlson lecture this year in order to avoid controversy.
Abbot concludes his piece today by arguing his treatment is just one example of what cancel culture is doing to society:
I view this episode as an example as well as a striking illustration of the threat woke ideology poses to our culture, our institutions and to our freedoms. I have consistently maintained that woke ideology is essentially totalitarian in nature: it attempts to corral the entirety of human existence into one narrow ideological viewpoint and to silence anyone who disagrees. I believe that these features ultimately derive from the ideology’s abandonment of the principle of the inherent dignity of each human being. It is only possible to instrumentalize the individual in order to engineer group-based outcomes within a philosophical framework that has rejected this principle. Similarly, it is easy to justify silencing a dissenter if your ideology denies her individual dignity.
There is some good news here. While Abbot was deplatformed at MIT, Princeton has invited him to give his lecture on the same day he was scheduled to speak at MIT. The Princeton lecture will be available on Zoom.
Obviously it’s good news that Abbot hasn’t been fired or had his job made more more difficult. And it’s good news that a version of his lecture will take place. Still, all of this might have gone very differently if not for the intervention of just two people, his school’s President and one professor at Princeton. What happens to our universities when the people who joined the cancel mob (mostly grad students) take over the administration? The fact that cancel culture often doesn’t result in cancellation isn’t a sign that the mob is reasonable or non-threatening, it’s only proof that their long march through the institutions isn’t complete.
And judges are their High Priests and Priestesses.
U. Chicago is generally very good about academic freedom. As the article states, U.Chicago President Zimmer wrote a letter to incoming freshmen warning about “cancel culture.”
So this did not come from administration. This is all from a group of disaffected graduate students - whose names, ironically, were not allowed to be shown.
He is right, merit is the only non-racist way to judge. MLK said “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
Zimmer should have EXPELLED ALL OF THEM upon receipt of the first letter, College is for Adults not whiney little children.
“the needs of the many (dramatic pause) outweigh the needs of the few”
A recall a few year back, the chancellors at the U of C decided they were going to be some kind of bulwark and defend speech freedom in the academic setting. They put it in writing. They warn prospective students if they are easily triggered they should probably go somewhere else.
Base reviews on merit??!! What are you, some kind of radical psycho?
“These zealots don’t believe the freedoms in the First Amendment apply to the rest of us.”
Luckily for us, it’s the Second Amendment that will probably decide this cultural struggle, and that amendment applies to everyone even if they don’t believe in it :)
Excellent points but there is a deeper and more insidious factor here. Note the demographic of Professor Dorian Abbot's attackers; undergrads, graduate students, teaching assistants etc., aka young adults, cradled and taught in the LEFTist Academia milieu. Make no mistake, this is the same young adult that populated the revolutions of the past and populates Antifa now.
They, being the current 'woke mob', have little life experiences but have the zeitgeist of being on the cutting edge against their version of the 'Ancien Régime' in academia and everywhere else! Given their head, they will be happy to trot out the carts to take their opponents for 'deserved' haircuts!
A picture of the good professor. Likely to be, OR, have been, leaning left but also like mugged colleagues of recent note, Evergreen State College EX-Professor Bret Weinstein & Yale Professor Nicholas Christakis & Wife, now seeing what a mob can do. Ugly, is it not Professor?
An online tool to decide who to vote for?
Guy sounds like a moron. Just like those precious “undecided” voters.
The University of Chicago? Very disappointed in my alma mater.
Now he knows how Jewish academics were treated in Germany in the 1930s.
He uses an online tool to decide who to vote for.
God gave him a brain and he can’t use it....hence climate change based on what a computer tells him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.