Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawsuit: Alabama congressional map 'racially gerrymandered'
AP ^ | Sept 28, 2021 | KIM CHANDLER

Posted on 09/28/2021 5:31:19 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — A lawsuit filed Tuesday as lawmakers get set to draw Alabama's new congressional map is challenging the state's current congressional districts, saying they are “racially gerrymandered” and limit Black voters’ influence in all but one congressional district.

Alabama currently has one majority-minority district represented by U.S. Rep. Terri Sewell, the lone Democrat and only Black member of Alabama’s congressional district. The lawsuit argues Alabama should have a congressional map that would “afford African Americans an opportunity to elect candidates of their choice in at least two districts.”....

“Alabama’s current Congressional redistricting plan, enacted in 2011 is malapportioned and racially gerrymandered, packing black voters in a single majority-black Congressional district,” the lawsuit states. The lawsuit argues that legislators packed as “many minorities as possible” into the congressional district that stretches from Birmingham through west Alabama and into Montgomery — “thereby weakening minorities’ voting influence throughout the state.”

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: congress; districts; gerrymander; racial
Wow, I thought gerrymandering to pack black districts was a Dem goal? Wasn't North Carolina 12 initially done by dems?
1 posted on 09/28/2021 5:31:19 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

What she is arguing for IS racial gerrymandering!


2 posted on 09/28/2021 5:34:19 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I never understood why districts were allowed to be drawn the way that they are drawn. Why not just draw a line down the center of the state and cut it into even sized districts.


3 posted on 09/28/2021 5:46:31 PM PDT by 98charlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 98charlie

Or simply clump together adjacent townships.


4 posted on 09/28/2021 5:49:25 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Notice how the media never uses the dreaded “g-word” when Democrats are screwing Republicans to the wall?

Anyone with their eyes open could have seen this coming for months, if not years: Democrats will go shopping for sufficiently corrupt black-robed tyrants and try to overturn EVERY Republican-drawn district map for the upcoming decade, and they will succeed in doing so much more often than not. But never a peep from the Romney-controlled RNC when the shoe is on the other foot (like what just happened last week in New Mexico).


5 posted on 09/28/2021 5:53:40 PM PDT by PermaRag (We have SO many targets, and -- for now -- the means to see they get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Doing what the minority party does best - stealing seats in the US House...


6 posted on 09/28/2021 6:11:10 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

So is every congressional district ...


7 posted on 09/28/2021 6:18:01 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 98charlie

“I never understood why districts were allowed to be drawn the way that they are drawn. Why not just draw a line down the center of the state and cut it into even sized districts.”

Because population is nearly never distributed geographically.


8 posted on 09/28/2021 6:20:13 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Good idea divide the blacks betwen at least three districts that way there wont be any Dem congressmen.


9 posted on 09/28/2021 6:34:03 PM PDT by amnestynone (We are asked by people who do not tolerate us to tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Here's what the current house district map looks like:

10 posted on 09/28/2021 7:02:36 PM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

District #7 (the Democrat district) is the one that looks like it’s been stretched around to ensure Democrat certainty.


11 posted on 09/28/2021 7:07:06 PM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Seems racist as hell to carve up Congressional districts for the specific purpose of guaranteeing racial outcomes. Districting should be based on natural geography/population numbers/economic interests/etc. Racial set-asides are just another Democrat gimmick to steal power.


12 posted on 09/28/2021 7:11:46 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amnestynone

Yep. Incorporate lots of blacks into one district to ensure a black Democrat is elected and you are racist for putting them all in one district so the other districts don’t elect blacks. But put them in several districts and they may end up with no black congressmen. You are diluting their votes and are therefore racist. You cannot satisfy some folks so don’t even try!


13 posted on 09/28/2021 7:16:28 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Done mostly by the Feds using the Voting Rights Act.

Now that has expired - Dems have to use other tools to maintain control. They are trying to repass the restrictions this Congress.

Dems would bow rather have two white liberals than one black


14 posted on 09/28/2021 8:52:09 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 98charlie

There are a substantial number of rational and reasonable premises on which to divide up the state. Occupations, culture, general incomes, urbanization. All of these are justifiable.

That’s why it is a political question.


15 posted on 09/28/2021 10:51:29 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yes - exactly.

Of course if they were black Republicans they would also not count.


16 posted on 09/29/2021 5:17:43 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Call it “Gerrymandering” if you will but a state’s governor’s power over redistricting is the last bulwark against the federal government becoming one-party rule.


17 posted on 09/29/2021 6:22:24 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson