Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCarthy faces ethics complaint after saying GOP 'will not forget' if firms hand records to Jan. 6 panel
The Hill ^ | 09/03/21 12:38 PM EDT | BY REBECCA BEITSCH

Posted on 09/03/2021 9:58:53 AM PDT by RandFan

A public interest group is calling for an ethics investigation into House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) after he told communications companies that the GOP “will not forget” if they turn phone and email records over to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The complaint from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) argues that both McCarthy and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) violated House rules by threatening to retaliate against companies that comply with legal requests.

The House committee investigating the attack on the Capitol sent letters to 35 tech and communications firms Monday asking for a trove of documents, including for personal communications of those involved with the “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6 — a group likely to include lawmakers.

“If these companies comply with the Democrat order to turn over private information, they are in violation of federal law and subject to losing their ability to operate in the United States,” McCarthy wrote.

“If companies still choose to violate federal law, a Republican majority will not forget and will stand with Americans to hold them fully accountable under the law,” he said.

McCarthy did not cite which law prohibits telecommunications companies from complying with the committee’s request.

While communications companies often seek to alert those whose records will be turned over, it's not clear if complying with the request would violate the law given Congress’s investigative authority.

“House rules require members to uphold the laws of the United States and to conduct themselves at all times in a manner that reflects creditably on the House. The threats of Reps. McCarthy and Greene do neither. Threatening retaliation for complying with legally valid document demands and preservation requests appears to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1505, which prohibits obstructing congressional investigations, and does not reflect creditably on the House,” CREW President Noah Bookbinder wrote in a complaint filed with the Office of Congressional Ethics.

Like McCarthy, Greene told Fox News this week that companies would face ramifications for compliance with the requests.

"If these telecommunications companies, if they go along with this, they will be shut down. And that's a promise," she told Fox's Tucker Carlson on Tuesday.

Greene’s records have reportedly been requested by the committee, according to CNN. The news outlet also found the committee would seek the phone records of GOP Reps. Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Paul Gosar (Ariz.), Matt Gaetz (Fla.), Lauren Boebert (Colo.), Mo Brooks (Ala.), Madison Cawthorn (N.C.), Louie Gohmert (Texas), Jody Hice (Ga.), Scott Perry (Pa.) and Jim Jordan (Ohio), whom Republicans once tapped to serve on the committee.

Following McCarthy’s comment, the committee said it would not be deterred in its work.

“The Select Committee is investigating the violent attack on the Capitol and attempt to overturn the results of last year’s election," a committee spokesperson said Tuesday.

"We’ve asked companies not to destroy records that may help answer questions for the American people. The committee’s efforts won’t be deterred by those who want to whitewash or cover up the events of January 6th, or obstruct our investigation.”

The Office of Congressional Ethics declined to comment while representatives for McCarthy and Greene did not immediately respond to The Hill.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1621; crew; jan6committee; marjorietaylorgreene; mccarthy; mtg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 09/03/2021 9:58:53 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

The question is whether the requests are legal.


2 posted on 09/03/2021 10:00:25 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
"BY REBECCA BEITSCH"

Let the jokes begin.
3 posted on 09/03/2021 10:01:29 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Democrats usually issue their threats through surrogates.


4 posted on 09/03/2021 10:03:16 AM PDT by ProudDeplorable (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. ~ Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Let me respond for Kevin McCarthy (what he’d probably never say): “Go away and shut up. Or just go away.”


5 posted on 09/03/2021 10:04:00 AM PDT by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Nancy Pelosi hiked up her skirts screaming, “Eeeek! Eeeek!”.


6 posted on 09/03/2021 10:06:01 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

It won’t go anywhere and the Dems won’t get enough Pubs to go along with them to have them expelled.


7 posted on 09/03/2021 10:09:38 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (Having the Conch shell is no longer recognized by Dem "Flies" as giving one authority to speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

“sent letters to 35 tech and communications firms Monday”

Is that list publicly available?


8 posted on 09/03/2021 10:12:14 AM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

In other words Witch Hunts are Illegal.

9 posted on 09/03/2021 10:16:56 AM PDT by Nateman (If the Left is not screaming , you are doing it wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
"BY REBECCA BEITSCH" Let the jokes begin.

She doesn't care what her son has to go through.

10 posted on 09/03/2021 10:28:48 AM PDT by frank ballenger (You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

McCarthy was a jackass.

Whether this is true or not, he could could simply have shut the discussion down by saying: “Show us Pelousy’s comms at that time, first.”

Instead, he makes this into a big leftie talking point.

There is a reason they are called “The Stupid Party.”


11 posted on 09/03/2021 10:31:40 AM PDT by Fido969 (45 is Superman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington is a Democrat run ans staffed activist organization (During the Trump administration, CREW took over 800 legal actions)

Board Chair
Beth Nolan

Board Vice Chair
Wayne Jordan

Board members
Evan McMullin
The Honorable Claudine Schneider (R RI - environmental activist and likely assistant Democrat)
Zephyr Teachout <-— hahaha
Al Dwoskin
Craig Kaplan
John Luongo
The Honorable Claire McCaskill (D)


12 posted on 09/03/2021 10:43:45 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

McCarthy should have just threatened there are six ways to Sunday for retribution.


13 posted on 09/03/2021 10:54:23 AM PDT by patriot torch (Ashlie Babbitt-say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Didn’t Chuckie threaten SCOTUS?


14 posted on 09/03/2021 11:11:50 AM PDT by Zack Attack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudDeplorable; RandFan
ProudDeplorable :" Democrats usually issue their threats through surrogates. "

That's also how these 501(C,3) agencies get their money.
The complainants, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) were founded to counteract for Judicial Watch.
Much better they change their name to Socialists /Communists Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington would change their abbreviation from CREW to SCCREW .
More appropriate and totally descriptive !

15 posted on 09/03/2021 11:13:36 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Exactly, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington is an organization that stands for anything but that. They only demand ethics and responsibility from Republicans. Democrats can say and do anything and it meets CREWs definition for ethics and responsibility.


16 posted on 09/03/2021 11:26:17 AM PDT by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
What about SCHMUCK FACE THREATENING the SUPREME COURT JUSTICES BY NAME?????

Oh, I forgot.....Democrats are ABOVE LAWS and ETHICS! TWO JUSTICE SYSTEMS!!!

17 posted on 09/03/2021 11:27:57 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I wonder how the demacrat party would feel if all there electronic data was turned over to a committee investigating corruption headed by Marjorie Taylor Greene.


18 posted on 09/03/2021 11:31:07 AM PDT by PCPOET7 (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
It's CREW, the leftist version of Judicial Watch.

-PJ

19 posted on 09/03/2021 11:36:12 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

So warning entities to comply with the law is now obstruction.


20 posted on 09/03/2021 11:38:16 AM PDT by newzjunkey (“We Did It Joe!” - The Taliban /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson