Posted on 09/01/2021 11:19:26 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) is calling a special legislative session to extend the eviction moratorium in the state after the Supreme Court blocked the federal eviction freeze put in place by the Biden administration.
The special session is set to begin on Wednesday at noon. Hochul had for days been mulling calling legislators back to Albany to address the moratorium, but officially made the announcement on Tuesday.
Hochul said her goal is to extend the eviction moratorium until Jan. 15.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
More tenants (voters) than landlords. No skin off her nose.
Federal...................
This has got to be illegal. People have a right to rental income from their property. It’s called “livelihood”.
The Supreme Court ruled on the Biden executive order eviction moratorium.....
This has nothing to do with individual state legislative law.....
Said the CDC doesn’t have the authority, never said that a state can’t pass a new law or something which is what they appear to be trying to do.
but you can’t throw them out in the January cold!!!
the have to extend it till June, right?
then in June...
It didn’t take very long for SSDD.
Sucks to be a landlord in NY. But you already knew that. California, Illinois and others to follow soon.
Actually, the Supreme Court said a legislature could this. They just ruled that a president couldn’t do it without legislative authority.
NY State survives off the skimmings of Wall Street and trading in America’s massive debt. But ironically, that’s allowed it to become the most permanent leftist nanny-state in the USA - I believe even more entrenched than California’s.
how about a gasoline tax moratorium, if they can rob from the landlords they can rob from the government
The Supreme Court ruled on the Biden executive order eviction moratorium.....
This has nothing to do with individual state legislative law.....
New York: Where you can’t be forced to pay rent to stay in a home owned by a free American citizen. But you can be forced to pay your tab at the state store.
>>Actually, the Supreme Court said a legislature could this. They just ruled that a president couldn’t do it without legislative authority.
U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 forbids states from impairing the obligations of contracts.
>>Hey dumb broad, the supreme court said no more.<<
o, they just said an administrative department cannot make law “for the good of the people.”
It will be an important case the next time some department decides it wants to tell people what to do, en masse. It may be the chink in the armor for future suits when other administrative departments go too far.
But it does not control what the states do. I hope the landlords of NY file immediate suit as an illegal taking.
Manigault v. Springs, 199 U.S. 473, 480 (1905). “ It is the settled law of this court that the interdiction of statutes impairing the obligation of contracts does not prevent the State from exercising such powers as are vested in it for the promotion of the common weal, or are necessary for the general good of the public, though contracts previously entered into between individuals may thereby be affected. . . . In other words, that parties by entering into contracts may not estop the legislature from enacting laws intended for the public good.”
Article I Section 10 Clause 1:
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.-PJ
Hochul is a leftist lunatic who plays the “moderate Democrat” game through the use of lying language.
The NY Democrats have had an anti-landlord law waiting since last January. Whatever Hochul does will not be in response to anything.
They have been waiting for the other illegal stuff to lapse or get struck down, so their communist level anti-landlord legislation would appear to be in reacton to something, as opposed to an expression of their hatred for landlords, the focus of communist hatred everywhere and in every time.
People need to keep in mind that the leftist lunatic Hochul is a project of the family of Chris Jacobs, the traitor who is the “Republican” representative from the most pro-Trump district in NY. Jacobs voted to investigate the FBI hoax of January 6, but NOT to uncover the hoax, to perpetrate the hoax.
His family is the big money behind Hochul, and Hochul’s husband is a personal retainer for the Jacobs, paid for in huge bucks.
Thus, a district which would easily vote in Louis Gohmert, is represented by a leftist fabrication, whose family is embarked on putting NY under furthered Cabal control.
And that, friends, is why the “Republicans” have never done anything but lower taxes for their wealthy friends, and brag to us about how we got to keep a pittance of our own money. Otherwise, we get nothing but their lies and their disdain.
Thanks for posting that, I had not seen it. However, that case seems narrowly decided in terms of justifying “common weal” (in this case draining swampland). And clearly indicates that compensation must be paid for a taking of property. So, unless this moratorium has the State of NY paying the rents on behalf of the tenants, it will be unconstitutional.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.