Posted on 08/29/2021 6:54:30 AM PDT by C19fan
Amid the blood-spattered horrors of Kabul, perhaps the most startling response has been an outpouring of warlike passion from disaffected young Western men. But they’re not backing Western soldiers. They’re cheering on the Taliban.
Far-Right groups are gloating. One user on an online message board called the toppled Western-backed Afghan government ‘globohomo-clownworld’. He characterised this as powered by ‘liberalism, consumerism, secularism, usury, democracy, global capitalism… and most of all, feminism/women’s rights/women’s liberation’.
Such men consider abhorrent this value system that an America-led coalition spent trillions of dollars trying to instil, via two decades of Afghan ‘nation-building’.
These alienated men hate all of it – the whole woke world view, from racial tolerance to LGBT rights to feminism. And they’re lionising the Taliban as heroic anti-woke freedom fighters.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
MWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
That user is NOT WRONG!
Yes, it is ALWAYS “which side is further from US? That’s my pal”!
History….if it’s one side against one other, libs will cheer and prop up and apologize for the side that is further culturally and genetically from the US. That’s how they are with movies. Mostly they make the movies and are “objective” with same such side if not blatantly pro-anti-US-related.
INSANE LEFT WINGER MARY HARRINGTON
Notice they make the left guy look like an std, aids infected fag. I love it.
Truth.
They’re probably a combination of FBI dweebs and alienated 16-25yo boys who can’t figure any other way to rebel against their ultra-liberal parents, while still getting to stay well fed and unbothered in their parents’ basement.
Malangs memes are pretty funny and to the point.
When the terms "right" and "left" were first used to identify political parties, the left was in favor of democracy and the right was in favor of retaining the monarchies.
The Far Right is not in favor of totalitarianism, but something more akin to authoritarianism. You could still be different, but only in the privacy of your own home. If the Taliban followed Islamic law they would be authoritarian. To the extent they force everyone to become Muslim (if they do so) then that would be totalitarian. This seems to be where China is headed as all dissent, even in private, is being attacked by Chairman Xi.
Libertarianism and even conservatism are actually watered-down versions of liberalism. They both are willing to swallow some, but not all of the liberal/progressive agenda. They somehow thought that once Western Culture got a whiff of freedom from legal and moral authorities that it would stop at some reasonable compromise between openness and all out chaos. But the clown car didn't stop at some reasonable point like where it was in the 50's. It kept trundling along and is now headed for the same cliff that all empires have taken a nosedive from.
Even the leftists at the Daily Mail know that eye candy is good click bait.
It’s interesting that the left loves Muslims, but this article calls them “far-right.”
Fortunately, wokeism and the Taliban are not our only choices. But, if we had to choose between the two, after suffering through western sexual depravity and its war on men and boys, the Taliban are starting to look better than the west as it is now.
I don’t know anyone on the right who likes the Taliban. Biden certainly appears to love them.
“The taliban are not leftist but extreme religious right on steroids.”
The Taliban are totalitarians who want women subservient, and hate Christians.
The woke are totalitarians who want men subservient, and hate Christians.
I disagree with you. Like those who label Fascists as being ‘right-wingers’, you limit your view of the political spectrum to that which you are comfortable (e.g. communism, fascism, democracy, monarchy, etc.)
Those who insist on a strong central government today would consider Fascists to be ‘right-wingers’, but those, like Thomas Jefferson, who prefer to distribute the power to local control (i.e. True Democracy) would disagree with that assessment.
On the full-political spectrum, “Right-Wing” = “Anarchy”. Few people would opt for anarchy so we agree that we need some form of government. In that sense, few people could be considered ‘Right-Wingers”.
The leftists love labels, and we should refuse to play that game because doing so lets them make the rules. Thus, they can call anybody a ‘bigot’, and conservatives cower in fear. They can call anybody ‘right-wing’, and conservatives go hide in a corner.
We need to remember what the spectrum truly is so we will be strong in our faith and proudly deflect any such labels.
True. Our government openly celebrates butt sex, trannies invading little girls’ bathrooms, and sexual mutilation.
Really stretching it there. No way a comparison.
To call the taliban leftist is beyond ridicoulas.
Look out everyone, there are trolls on the internet!
“I don’t know anyone on the right who likes the Taliban”
Ha ha see post #73 right above yours. While the taliban is too the extreme I sorta agree with where they are coming from. Thge rampant sexuality, degeneracy, moral rot in Western culture.
As poster Drew68 pointed out he would not be surprised white males may one day be “allies” with the taliban. I can see this as white men are further prosecuted, demonized, belittled in life and the job fields. When life goes to the extreme as it it today expect a pushback and it might be bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.