Posted on 08/24/2021 6:52:31 AM PDT by Rusty0604
A document that the group’s founder Catherine Engelbrecht circulated to prospective donors, obtained by Breitbart News, details several facets of the investigation—which centers on what the group describes as the collection of cell phone GPS ping data in key election hotspots around the country including Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.
The document says that True The Vote has spent the last several months since late last year collecting more than 27 terabytes of geospatial and temporal data—a total of 10 trillion cell phone pings—between Oct. 1 and Nov. 6 in targeted areas in Georgia, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The data includes geofenced points of interest like ballot dropbox locations, as well as UPS stores and select government, commercial, and non-governmental organization (NGO) facilities.
“From this we have thus far developed precise patterns of life for 242 suspected ballot traffickers in Georgia and 202 traffickers in Arizona,” True The Vote’s document says. “According to the data, each trafficker went to an average of 23 ballot dropboxes.”
In other words, what the document says is that True The Vote was able to take cell phone ping data on a mass wide scale and piece together that several people—suspected ballot harvesters—were making multiple trips to multiple drop boxes, raising potential legal questions in a number of these states.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
A telephone book?
Bttt.
5.56mm
👍👍
I worked for an advertising company in my last gig. We had an account with another firm that allowed us to push advertising to phone id’s that were in a certain vicinity.
You get the phone ID’s reverse append them, find the owners, and then their addresses, info and start building profiles, once you see the web of democrat operatives it all starts coming together like movie where all of the photos are connected with red string.
I could to all of this once I had the data and the data can be had without anyone knowing WHY you wanted the data, it was just an advertising campaign in Fulton county Georgia....
I bet they have them nailed....
most criminals keep their phones on them at all times so they can’t say they were at x when they were at y
stay tuned...it could be interesting
I worked for an advertising company in my last gig. We had an account with another firm that allowed us to push advertising to phone id’s that were in a certain vicinity.
You get the phone ID’s reverse append them, find the owners, and then their addresses, info and start building profiles, once you see the web of democrat operatives it all starts coming together like movie where all of the photos are connected with red string.
I could to all of this once I had the data and the data can be had without anyone knowing WHY you wanted the data, it was just an advertising campaign in Fulton county Georgia....
I bet they have them nailed....
most criminals keep their phones on them at all times so they can’t say they were at x when they were at y
stay tuned...it could be interesting
I think voter rolls are public information. If not public, they must be accessible. That’s why we constantly read stories about how some candidate didn’t vote in the past 10 years.
Can you EVEN BEGIN to imagine the hue and cry if the phone company published one of those things today?
Yes, there are inevitable abuses like rogue police officers secretly tracking their exes or accessing data for dodgy private purposes. Yet if one watches real-life crime shows, one will also see murder cases solved and innocent suspects cleared because cell phone data verified otherwise dubious alibis. On the whole, additional legislation seems likely to further restrict but not elminate cell phone datamining. It is too valuable a tool to lose.
Did some research in VA.
There is a list of registered voters that anyone can buy, not specifying party.
One can also buy a list of actual voters, not including how they voted.
I think your idea could be one of the tactics used for cheating.
I’ve always known that cell phone location data was being collected and used to solve crimes but I thought law enforcement needed a warrant to use it...
I understand if data is collected it will be abused by people in the government, it’s just to tempting to check out your spouse, girlfriend/boyfriend, neighbor, etc....
If this group has all the data they claim and it sure looks like it, it’s worrying to me that this type of data is available to anyone who has the time and money to look for it...
For most of my life, I have volunteered for campaigns. “Back in the day”, we used to have registered voter list, by neighborhood, with phone numbers. Us volunteers would sit down and call, house by house, to find out who “Our” voters were. Then, on election day, we would call them all to remind them to get out. The last election I worked on was Rand Paul’s first Senate run.
Most neighborhoods were 80-90% one party or the other. It was amazing.
I guess the robocallers do all that now.
I’ve been thinking a lot about HOW I would cheat. This seems like the easiest thing to me, if you have unlimited resources. Even better is, pre-print a bunch of ballots for one candidate. But, that requires having a number of people INSIDE the vote counting area that are willing to risk going to jail to sneak in fake votes.
Not hard to believe that’s possible too, in many areas. But, that kind of cheating shows up in an audit.
That's ALL you need. Party affiliation doesn't matter. You just need to know is:
1) WHO is registered, and
2) WHO actually votes.
and street addresses
Well, they were around before the internet and one usually only received them for the town they lived in and maybe a few surrounding towns. Plus, the vicious tactic of doxxing people with whom one disagreed was not practiced at the time.
That is if you want to try to cover your tracks. Unlike some voting precincts that counted more votes than total population. Oops!
Getting a little tired of the “almost there” reports.
Well, yeah; all the would-be doxxers were in the book, too; just hangin’ right out there in the breeze like everybody else.
Yes. That’s the easy, but sloppy way…. Just run the same ballots over and over
Thus, as to business records, only statutes or regulations or the resistance of the holders of business records might provide privacy protection, not the Fourth Amendment. This is where Rand Paul and other rabid privacy advocates go off the rails, arguing a Fourth Amendment theory that has failed in the courts for decades.
Here is another thing to worry about: license plate scanners that detect stolen vehicles -- as well as vehicles without insurance and drivers with suspended license -- and even parole violators and errant husbands out on the prowl. Since the data is all generated by activity in public, there is no Fourth Amendment violation when the government collects or otherwise accesses it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.