Posted on 08/12/2021 8:28:03 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.” Just as disturbing as the data is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:
In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. But the study data actually show quite the oppose.
Table 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print below the table to see this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as “spontaneous abortions” in the table.
In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as “stillbirths” and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.
Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their “spontaneous abortions” calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
Put another way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her third trimester to have a “spontaneous abortion” in the first 20 weeks, since they weren’t vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren’t time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn’t be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.
The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, “How to lie with statistics,” because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (It’s a small set of 127 pregnant women, so we’d like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.)
A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, “What percentage of lemons are yellow?” The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, “50% of lemons are yellow” because it’s 50/100.
But the other 50 pieces of fruit can’t possibly be included because they’re limes, not lemons. So the correct math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That’s the correct answer.
In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a “spontaneous abortion” can occur. And since pregnant women aren’t time travelers, they can’t go back in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either can’t do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then “science” has already failed its core promise: to offer “evidence-based” conclusions to understand the world around us.
Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.6%. Why? Because they’re covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.
In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For example, here’s another study he co-authored: “Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013.”
That study concluded, “Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns after TIV-ID.”
But is that conclusion based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same study architect has made the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn’t be the first time one author was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn’t that what the “scientific method” demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can’t just accept bad math and call it “science” when the bad math doesn’t check out.
In the mean time, it’s clear that 4 out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at least, according to the small data set we have so far). And that means the “depopulation” aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.
Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine spike proteins directly attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an “atrocity” and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is “shameful.” You can hear him in his own words in the following interview:
All this means that live births may plummet by 3.2 million over the next year, in the USA alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching “holocaust” levels, which is why this is being called a medical “atrocity.”
The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden’s land management czar once characterized human children as an “environmental hazard.”
This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere “crimes against humanity.” It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to aid humanity, but are now clearly shown to be working towards humanity’s destruction.
“It’s a small set of 127 pregnant women, so we’d like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.”
What a great idea... These are real humanitarians! 104 dead babies out of 127 pregnancies. That is just not enough to establish a trend. Why not find a thousand more pregnant lady volunteers and sacrifice at the current rate just 819 more babies? Why didn’t Bill Gates think of it? It is all for science.
Just sickening.
Just evil for ANYONE to advocate that pregnant women take these dangerous shots.
What kind of person even volunteers for this ‘review’???
Dems, RINOS and CINOS here will attack you just as they attack on the other threads that show this is all a scamdemic, a plandemic, or when Fauci is being exposed yet again.
45,000 deaths by vaccine. No biggie
I hate to think this but maybe this”Vaccine” was designed from the start as a population reducer.
Its certainly doing the job better than the ChiCom Bioweapon its supposed to treat.
If I read the actual paper correctly, the study is a snapshot of time, December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021. Within that (arbitrary?) time-window, from a total vaccinated sample of 3958 women, 827 women had their pregnancies end in one manner or another.
The 827 completed pregnancies includes 115 miscarriages/stillbirth. All of these are from the larger group of 3958.
It so happens that the ratio of successful/unsuccessful pregnancies reported in their chosen time-window is generally “normal”. However, that they managed to capture 700 women who didn’t even get the shot until the third term makes me wonder if they did some custom fitting of their study time-window, to possibly hide something disturbing.
I’d rather know the eventual outcome for all 3958 women before drawing any conclusions.
But you're the one who said that, not me.
This report was posted on FR quite a while ago. I don’t care for their presentation, but I also think the critique is a bit lacking.
From the study: “. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester).
Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported.
Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic.
Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases)”
Found in the conclusions section:
“However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.”
Data was collected from December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, which means that some women’s full term delivery may not happen until October or November. The study was EPublished in April-when the fate of the majority of the 3958 pregnancies was unknown.
They do note that most of the live births were for the people given shots in the third trimester. And they note that further study of those vaccinated early in pregnancy are needed.
So of the 3958 followed in V-safe, we only know the outcome of 827, which leaves 3131 as unknown. How many of those were 1st or 2cd trimester? What has since transpired?
The study also notes that this result is comparable to other studies done which involved pregnant women - but we have also do not know from what is presented here, what those studies involved.
Bottom line is that it is clear that if you are going to risk this shot, best do it in third trimester, but we didn’t really need a study to tell us that-did we?
And we won’t know the final statistics of the impact of the shot in early pregnancy vs late stages, unless someone completes the follow up on the rest of the 3958.
Additionally it was noted that 35,691 were reported as pregnant when looking at more than V-safe. We have no reporting on those at all.
This is just plain wrong. The people who wrote this article didn’t read the source.. just went crazy and got things backward. 20% abortion rate isn’t acceptable to anyone so.. the actual report is a nightmare... but being just wrong blows credibility.
___________S P I K E _ P R O T E I N S______ You are being injected with these when you become WackCinatted
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as “spontaneous abortions” in the table.
Thanks for posting. Forced vax coming where I am working my notice. I get out just in time.
Ya know, some people are saying to make them fire ya. Then you can be part of the class action lawsuits that are bound to be coming down the line.
I’m just glad I’ve been retired for a while, and have no need to deal with the ignorance that is prevailing.
I just watched Dr. McCullough, and he said the vaccines are already obsolete, and since it is very treatable at home, if treatment is started early, there is no reason to do this.
And from other studies and outbreaks, we know that the Injected can be sick without knowing it due to reduced symptoms and thus, spread it unknowingly.
So any company that requires this is basically shooting themselves in the foot. People who know they are sick can stay home and not infect the workplace.
I like that short video from Dr. Stock - pretty much explains it all in about 6 minutes:
It went viral, and has already been taken down from the original source, but it’s still on Gorka’s tweet-linked above. I hope someone can put it on rumble or bit chute cause it is really good. Why the shot makes things worse.
Full text; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117969/
Read it for yourselves and make your own decision. BTW, this is based on v-safe reporting. That’s the CDC’s internal version of VAERS.
OK.. I will look again.
Thanks.. they did a great job of hiding this astonishing nightmare in a footnote. Rereading the post and the actual article rather than the abstract.. this is much clearer.
“but nobody I know who has been vaccinated has had any adverse reactions.”
Everyone I know that got the vaccine has had complications. They were usually sick as a dog for 10 days. I know several who have died. A bud of mine right now is getting over a 14 day illness after his first shot. Several co-workers have died.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.