Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STUDY: COVID19 Vaccine TERMINATES 4 out of 5 pregnancies via “spontaneous abortions”
Civilian Intelligence Network ^ | 05/07/2021 | SHAWN PAUL MELVILLE

Posted on 08/12/2021 8:28:03 PM PDT by SoConPubbie

A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.” Just as disturbing as the data is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:

  1. Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
  2. Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. But the study data actually show quite the oppose.

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print below the table to see this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as “spontaneous abortions” in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as “stillbirths” and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their “spontaneous abortions” calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.

Put another way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her third trimester to have a “spontaneous abortion” in the first 20 weeks, since they weren’t vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren’t time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn’t be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, “How to lie with statistics,” because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (It’s a small set of 127 pregnant women, so we’d like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, “What percentage of lemons are yellow?” The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, “50% of lemons are yellow” because it’s 50/100.

But the other 50 pieces of fruit can’t possibly be included because they’re limes, not lemons. So the correct math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That’s the correct answer.

In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a “spontaneous abortion” can occur. And since pregnant women aren’t time travelers, they can’t go back in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either can’t do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then “science” has already failed its core promise: to offer “evidence-based” conclusions to understand the world around us.

Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.6%. Why? Because they’re covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.

In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For example, here’s another study he co-authored: “Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013.”

That study concluded, “Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns after TIV-ID.”

But is that conclusion based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same study architect has made the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn’t be the first time one author was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn’t that what the “scientific method” demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can’t just accept bad math and call it “science” when the bad math doesn’t check out.

Spike protein injections into pregnant women an “atrocity,” warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean time, it’s clear that 4 out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at least, according to the small data set we have so far). And that means the “depopulation” aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.

Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine spike proteins directly attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an “atrocity” and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is “shameful.” You can hear him in his own words in the following interview:

All this means that live births may plummet by 3.2 million over the next year, in the USA alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching “holocaust” levels, which is why this is being called a medical “atrocity.”

The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden’s land management czar once characterized human children as an “environmental hazard.”

This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere “crimes against humanity.” It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to aid humanity, but are now clearly shown to be working towards humanity’s destruction.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adspam; antivaxhysteria; badatmath; clickbait; covid19; demscallitclickbait; demsusingkeywords; doomscrolling; fake; scamdemic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 08/12/2021 8:28:03 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

bttt


2 posted on 08/12/2021 8:29:42 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATI ON. I will never be a peaceful slave in a somehow new Socialist America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

In before the Free Republic Vaxx Shills come in with there copy-paste propaganda.


3 posted on 08/12/2021 8:30:06 PM PDT by The Iceman Cometh (F*ck Joe Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

its not surprising

its what its inteded to do

along with hopefully sterilizing the women

the covid bioweapon itself that was first released, targeted male testes to sterilize them


4 posted on 08/12/2021 8:30:34 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

You beat me to it. Well said.


5 posted on 08/12/2021 8:33:17 PM PDT by Qui is (Biden spews and Harris swallows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

The New World Order is vamping up. Trials and tribulations . . . as Jesus told us would happen. Religious persecution on the rise around the world including in this country. Just be ready to meet the Lord God Almighty. . . .no one is guaranteed a next breath. https://patburt.com/


6 posted on 08/12/2021 8:41:05 PM PDT by Maudeen (https://thereishopeinJesus.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

“How convenient!”, thought Bill Gates.


7 posted on 08/12/2021 8:41:18 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

This fact, that the vaccine had an adverse effect on the woman’s placenta, was known.
There is an excellent video by a woman who has, both a MD and a JD degree that points out the many wrong things about the vaccines that were rushed to production, without proper testing, that caused problems with pregnant women.
Her advice was this: “No woman who is of child bearing age should take the experimental vaccines!”
I wish that I had saved it. It was filmed in early 2021.


8 posted on 08/12/2021 8:47:03 PM PDT by BatGuano (Ya don't think that I would go into battle with change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Ping for later


9 posted on 08/12/2021 8:47:27 PM PDT by WhattheDickens? (Funny, I didn’t think this was 1984…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

Check out my past posts.

The conclusion is wrong, because most of the women in the study were lost to follow up and never reported back.

By definition, we cannot assign those women to either the “lost the pregnancy” or “successfully gave live birth” groups.

So it kinda messes up the calculation of the percentages.


10 posted on 08/12/2021 8:47:29 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; bitt

Bkmk


11 posted on 08/12/2021 8:50:39 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh

We are dealing with a virus cult, which morphed out of the original democrat cult. The virus was designed for the left to use in grabbing power and not just here in the USA, it has been a global process. I read an article over at therightscoop about more ludicrous demands, ‘Australia’s chief health official actually tells people to STOP talking to each other because COVID’, which you can find there, so give that a look. The communists demand we isolate, even from family and friends, and their risky scheme is working so far. These aren’t actual vaccines. They are correctly labeled in the emergency authorization as “investigational vaccine”. Not the same thing.


12 posted on 08/12/2021 8:52:05 PM PDT by ProfessorGoldiloxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

See ‘Utopia’ 2013 UK show that ran two ‘series’ (12 total episodes) or the 2020 USA remake (that ran 8 episodes). Virus leads to ‘vaccine’ which eliminates the ability to reproduce in virtually all people on Earth. Predictive programming.


13 posted on 08/12/2021 8:53:48 PM PDT by ProfessorGoldiloxx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Bill Gates is ecstatic.


14 posted on 08/12/2021 9:02:19 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
The conclusion of the actual study states:

'Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.'

(But I guess the study - which has been submitted here in 'proof' of something - was authored by 'vax-shills', too...)
15 posted on 08/12/2021 9:05:15 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
I’d like to see the rates of spontaneous abortions caused by other drugs/treatments taken during pregnancy.

Considering that pregnant women are advised against eating sushi and some types of cheese, I’m not entirely sure this is groundbreaking, especially as the article seems to indicate that the actual sample size was 127, not even 1000?

I’m by no means a “shill” but nobody I know who has been vaccinated has had any adverse reactions. Babies are still being born. I understand why people are distrustful of the CDC, et al, but the evidence of my own eyes, while anecdotal, aligns with the party line thus far. We’ll see what happens in the next few years but as of now those predicting that the sky will fall haven’t proven their case.

16 posted on 08/12/2021 9:07:14 PM PDT by TheDandyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Just one of the many wonderful things that the jabs were meant to do. Don’t you love it when a plan comes together? (Half sarcasm, half truth.)


17 posted on 08/12/2021 9:09:02 PM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Am I in before the Vax Nazis?


18 posted on 08/12/2021 9:12:08 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (I identify as fully vaccinated. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDandyMan

But there are so many here waiting for you to drop dead and prove their point.

What FR has come to is looking kind of gruesome...

(The ‘powers that be’ seem to want to divide us all on the national stage, and they are even accomplishing that on this forum.)


19 posted on 08/12/2021 9:22:15 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

How does Planned Parenthood feel about this?


20 posted on 08/12/2021 9:29:09 PM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson