Posted on 07/31/2021 9:39:59 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
For a potential presidential candidate who had built up a good amount of conservative goodwill, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem is projecting the wrong message to keep her name circulating in the hat. Admittedly, I was hopeful for her just a few months ago, but her actions since then have been made me back away.
The latest example of embracing Republican Establishment corporatism is abysmal. What’s worse is that she demonstrated her embrace of one of the most hated industries today among MAGA conservatives: Big Pharma.
“Workers whose employers are mandating a vaccine for continued employment have the power to say no. Our robust economy and job market gives them the option to find a new employer that values personal choice and responsibility, and doesn’t force mandates on their employees.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thelibertydaily.com ...
docket
Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital
It has links to get the documents filed in the case:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/59953190/bridges-v-houston-methodist-hospital/
Apparently, the case was removed from state court by the hospital and $1000 bonuses offered.
Thats what I’m going to do.
The question here is whether government should be micromanaging businesses
.
This sounds like the infamous line from France’s Marie Antionette, “The peasants have no bread? Let them eat cake.”
The peasants ultimately chopped off the calloused and arrogant, royal woman’s head in the French Revolution in 1793.
This SD governor should be calling out the tyrants by demanding the science data they claim is driving the tyranny.
Here, the woman governor is sounding completely out of touch with the furious anger of everday people who are smart enough to realize the massive scam taking place.
I stand corrected. You're right, this would most likely be viewed as employee misconduct.
You’re a troll.
Chapter and verse, from the Patriot Act?
Check your FReepmail.
So much for HIPAA....
I hate to tell you this, but Marie Antoinette never said that, nor was she “calloused and arrogant”. That line about eating cake arose out of the Leftist propaganda of the day. Moreover, Marie may have been naive and ingenuous, but she not uncaring.
It is against the law for an employer to require an employee to take an EUA authorized (that is, not “approved”) treatment as a condition of employment.
The Dementia Joe Admin has claimed they will not begin ENFORCING the law until (I think) July of ‘22, but in saying so they admit the law is on the books.
I’m expecting to have to make a choice in the fall and I won’t be choosing the jab.
She is right!!!
“… and I already have legal counsel and paperwork proactively written should my 2 jobs require the jab.”
Would like to know more about this.
exactly
Funny, how conservatism is only skin-deep with some babes.
“What else is she supposed to do or say?”
If she said nothing, would anyone be angry with her, or even care? Sometimes saying nothing is best.
Well if anyone wanted to find another job NOW is the time to do it!! Employers are BEGGING for workers!,,
I’m fine with her words
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.