Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Judge Rules That Shooting Victims Can Sue Gun Manufacturer
The Epoch Times ^ | July 9, 2021 | JACK PHILLIPS

Posted on 07/09/2021 8:54:05 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

A California judge ruled that victims of a 2019 shooting in San Diego that left one dead and three wounded can sue the manufacturer of a rifle and the gun shop that sold it.

Superior Court Judge Kenneth Medel ruled (pdf) Wednesday that the victims and families in the shooting in Poway, California, can file a lawsuit against Smith & Wesson, one of the largest gun manufacturers in the world, over alleged negligence.

Lawyers for Smith & Wesson argued that the lawsuit was barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), a federal law that shields gun manufacturers and sellers from liability. The 2005 law prohibits arms manufacturers and dealers from being sued over crimes that were committed with their products, although there are exceptions to the rule.

The plaintiffs in the suit alleged that the gun maker violated California state law by designing the M&P15 rifle—similar to the popular AR-15 rifle—so that it can be easily modified. The suit, which is backed by the gun-control group Brady Center, also claimed Smith & Wesson’s marketing “attracted impulsive young men with military complexes who were particularly likely to be attracted to the unique ability of AR-15 style weapons,” according to reports.

Medel also ruled that the gun shop, San Diego Guns, could be sued for selling a weapon to the alleged shooter, John Earnest, who the plaintiffs claimed was only 19 years old and lacked a hunting license that would have exempted him from California’s 21-year minimum age to purchase a gun.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit also claimed Earnest’s parents “negligently facilitated their son’s (the shooter’s) ability to gain access to one or more pieces of weaponry/tactical equipment used in the incident, upon information and belief, having prior knowledge of his … propensity for violence.”

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; bidenvoters; california
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2021 8:54:05 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The legal system is trash.


2 posted on 07/09/2021 8:56:31 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Going nowhere. This issue has already been settled. This Leftist judge ruling is meaningless Virtue Signalling.


3 posted on 07/09/2021 8:57:33 PM PDT by ocrp1982 ( Bibicly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We need to be able to sue the judicial circuit district that causes legal fees due to their inappropriate rulings and be made whole after they are over ruled.


4 posted on 07/09/2021 9:03:41 PM PDT by bdfromlv (Leavenworth hard time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

To give you an idea of how messed up the Republican Party is, Judge Medel was first appointed by Arnold Schwarzenegger.


5 posted on 07/09/2021 9:04:04 PM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I like how federal law can explicitly say one thing but it doesn’t matter because a Democrat-appointed judge feels something.


6 posted on 07/09/2021 9:05:30 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Oh, no!
A gun that can be easily modified!
Does it also cast an evil spell on anyone that touches it?


7 posted on 07/09/2021 9:09:00 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Up is down, right is wrong, and the insane dead souls now run the country. Whoot! There iit is. Whoot! There it is.


8 posted on 07/09/2021 9:11:42 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
who the plaintiffs claimed was only 19 years old and lacked a hunting license that would have exempted him from California’s 21-year minimum age to purchase a gun.

Is that true? I'm sure the gun shop would now the laws.

9 posted on 07/09/2021 9:12:24 PM PDT by MileHi ((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ocrp1982

The point isn’t to win the lawsuit. It’s to force the gun company into bankruptcy through lawyers’ fees.


10 posted on 07/09/2021 9:12:42 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (“Unlimited power in the hands of limited people always leads to cruelty.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

By the time the leftists get done with their little game, The Mexican cartels will have the market cornered and will ship whatever we need across the open border.
7.62×39 is what you want to be stocking now.
Just my opinion.


11 posted on 07/09/2021 9:20:33 PM PDT by Tolk2112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Can the victims of murderers that were released early by parole boards sue the state of California?


12 posted on 07/09/2021 9:23:24 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

It was a Ford which killed my brother. California stupidity should be universal against manufacturers.


13 posted on 07/09/2021 9:23:27 PM PDT by S.O.S121.500 (Had ENOUGH Yet ? ........................ Enforce the Bill of Rights .........It is the LAW. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bdfromlv; All
"We need to be able to sue the judicial circuit district that causes legal fees due to their inappropriate rulings and be made whole after they are over ruled."

If I understand you correctly, Trump's red tsunami of patriot supporters need to primary candidates for federal and state government offices who don't clearly promise to do things like you suggest to discourage activist judges from weaponizing the legal system.

14 posted on 07/09/2021 9:24:22 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Can the victims of crimes committed by illegal aliens sue politicians who created ‘santuaries’?


15 posted on 07/09/2021 9:33:24 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never...in nothing, great or small...Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tolk2112

> By the time the leftists get done with their little game, The Mexican cartels will have the market cornered and will ship whatever we need across the open border. <

Right. It would be Prohibition, Part 2. Just like in the 1920s. Law-abiding folks are harassed. Organized crime profits, and continues as before.


16 posted on 07/09/2021 9:35:28 PM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

judges like this need removal

they continue to prove they are not fit to sit on the bench


17 posted on 07/09/2021 9:37:42 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

So, the AR-15 and its variants are hunting rifles? Who knew?


18 posted on 07/09/2021 9:42:03 PM PDT by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ridiculous perversion of the law for DemoNaziCommie political power purposes. Judges who trash the law like this breed contempt — disrespect and utter contempt- of the judiciary. Itself highly corrosive to the survival of our society


19 posted on 07/09/2021 9:46:22 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not created, they're excreted." Cicero 2000 years ago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MileHi
who the plaintiffs claimed was only 19 years old and lacked a hunting license that would have exempted him from California’s 21-year minimum age to purchase a gun.

IF that's true — and that's a big "if", then the gun shop is in trouble.

20 posted on 07/09/2021 9:51:28 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson