I was always suspicious of the constitutionalist credentials of Justice Kavanaugh, but I had such high hopes for Amy Coney Barrett ... she turned out to be the biggest disappointment of all, from her first decision on the November 2020 elections to this one.
Facebook and Twitter can have terms of service but bakers and florists can’t.
So if a floral shop refuses to serve a gay wedding, and the Supreme Court says it must, I get the tort.
But what’s the damage?
Does the shop have to pay for another shop to provide services? Makes no sense.
This is all bullcrap.
Stinking fekking cowards. So much for Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett’s originalist credentials.
Roberts needs a nice comfy pillow. Like the kind Scalia last had.
I still maintain that the First Amendment argument is incorrect because there is too much interpretation around the idea of the exercise of religion. I think this entire argument should be around the 13th Amendment because forcing someone to work against his/her will is slavery/involuntary servitude. Make the ACLU defend slavery which is what they’re effectively doing.
In future just deliver dead...or soon to be dead...flowers to a perv “wedding”. When they complain apologize and offer a full refund. Problem solved.
Don’t give a Reason for denying them Service, JUST SAY NO
So in only three years is the court throwing out its decision in the Colorado baker case? With Trump’s new appointments being the ones who made the difference?
Wiki:
On June 25, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to the Supreme Court of Washington for further consideration in light of the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision.[26][27] On June 6, 2019, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Stutzman again, finding no evidence of religious animus.[28][29] Stutzman’s attorneys once again requested the U.S. Supreme Court to take her case,[30][31] but certiorari was denied in July 2021.[32]
The Court is telling you to write a law protecting Americans from SJW and the Gay Mafia.
Since when did a state (or even federal) anti-discrimination law trump the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution?
This should have been a lay-up for Kavanaugh and Barrett.
CAtholics are usually not very conservative.
Our republic is so decrepit that flower arranging is a state and federal judicial matter.
Sorry, I have freedom of association. That includes business.
We’re circling around the drain while China accelerates its plans for our demise.
So, if i won’t bake an abortion celebration cake, then I’m liable?
Weird religious freedom in this country. It’s only free if government agree with my positions.
Gorsuch has turned out to be surprisingly solid. Kavanaugh and Barrett have been huge disappointments. Particularly Kavanaugh, as Trump and Republicans went to war for him. Now, he stabs us in the back. The “all female clerks” was a warning sign.
They tried to jump to the Supreme Court...rather than go through the state courts first...appeals etc...That’s why they didn’t take it. There was no ruling.
With exception of 3 Justices, most gutless SC in History.
But this case should never have happened in the first place. I read elsewhere that Stutzman talked to the people she refused to provide services for, explained her decision, and that they (supposedly) went away without so much as a complaint. Turns out they ran right to the nearest lawyer and betrayed her, suing her instead.
This case smells of a set up from the first day, just like the baker in Colorado. Religious liberty is under assault and the courts are aiding and abetting that assault. America is doomed.
See my tagline.