Posted on 06/27/2021 5:05:14 AM PDT by Kaslin
When you continue to pay for the birthing & costs of raising a child out of wedlock, you produce more of them.
Axiomatic to the casual observer.
...welfare transfer payments reward those who bear children out of wedlock and punish those households where the father remains
Obviously a combination of both. Religion fixes the first issue but the second part is easy to fix: stop paying mother's to have kids with tax dollars!
Some races/groups never really had a nuclear family social structure and it shows by those statistics.
No, literally.
The Atlantic had an article about how the Communists in Russia tried abolishing marriage; it screwed up Russia so bad it was one of the few times the Communists rescinded a social/political policy.
But they made note of it for use on destabilizing countries they wanted to take over.
Did I mention The Atlantic article, was published in '26? ("But that's in the future!").
No it isn't.
1926.
Less than 10 years after the October Revolution.
Blacks desperately need a black Moses to lead them out of their societal wilderness.
As with all of the other disasters inflicted upon the United States by rampant socialism, only divine intervention can save the nation now.
Only real solution. However unlikely. It wasn’t Frederick Douglass, it wasn’t Booker T. Washington, it wasn’t Martin Luther King, it wasn’t Elijah Muhhammed, it wasn’t Jesse Jackson, it wasn’t Barack Obama, it certainly wasn’t Al Sharpton. Very much doubt it will be anyone.
Any shot by a White Cop?
“Some races never had a nuclear family...” True.
The African evolution of Homo Sapiens did not have to account for cold weather planning. Hence women could fend for themselves. Our welfare system mirrors that system. The African life strategy was “r” which is have a lot of children... and sexual partners.
The K strategy followed by the East Asians and Europeans was have wives and children that you take care of carefully to get through winters.
Our welfare system doesn’t have women fending for themselves; it has them relying on a primarily male workforce to provide everything for them.
In terms of cold weather planning, the same affliction is seen with many Pacific Islanders - a simplified worldview due to a lack of challenges to overcome. Their nearest neighbors with cold weather (Japan, US) became the primary outside threat to their isolation.
Peruse later.
But Hillary said “It takes a Village” was best...
Do indigenous Siberians and Arctic native Americans use the K strategy?
July 1, 1973
When they stopped the draft in 1973, THAT WAS THE BIGGEST CHANGE IN MY LIFETIME — the fatherless kid in America was abandoned to the gang leaders or left on his own at a young age to fend for himself.
The military drill instructor had been a surrogate father for many young men (of all races). That was discontinued IN ONE DAY. GONE.
Thank you Richard Nixon — NOT.
I’d like to see an analysis of the correlation of diverse “parenting” models with violent crime and mortality, specifically murder. Select areas where each model predominates. Amass data on individual murderers and victims, categorize by biological sex, and include parenting model for each subject. Are spawn raised without fathers more or les likely to be killers than those with biological fathers in their home? Victims? Could also look at biological fathers versus step-fathers, and/or serial sex partners of the mothers.
In the 1960s Lyndon Baines Johnson, the most successful white supremacist ever, and his legislative democrat henchmen wrote the welfare laws such that a female gets welfare, but she must kick out the father.
The more babies she has, the more she makes.
This was Johnson's "great society war on poverty".
A few trillion dollars later, the democrats' plan is a failure for its' victims as it keeps people on welfare, but a great success for democrats as they've used taxpayer money to buy the votes of welfare people, who don't even realize they are being kept down on the democrat plantation just as sure as if they were picking cotton.
Having no male role model in the family creates feral males who become gang members, bullies, thieves, rapists and killers.
Vast majority of “mass shooters” (most of them white, btw) have no biological father present in the home. Around 90+%
Fatherless rate for white babies: 28+%
Fatherless rate for black babies: 70%
So, perhaps “white privilege” is primarily the “privilege” of having two good parents in an intact family where children learn basic morality and are taught how to succeed and be happy in life….
Solutions not designed and intended to strengthen the family as the key, fundamental unit in society will fail to solve the growing individual and societal problems flowing from the disintegration of the family.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.