*** Philly Metro Ping ***
The Philadelphia Inquirer is Pennsylvania’s answer to the New York Times? The chief propagator of fake news, disinformation, lies and dirty tricks in Pennsylvania?
Nothing but bullshiite.
They are saying there were no dead votes in PA? Sure and Clinton never lies.
Pure Soviet politics.
how would lies about PA affect NY?
is there standing?
We saw how the Philadelphia precinct captains were kicking out GOP poll watchers who were legally supposed to be there. This was happening real time, on live TV during the election and days afterwards.
Now these stinking coup plotters are telling us not to believe our own eyes.
What about the tractor trailer driver who was transporting 250000 PA ballots from New York to Harrisburg. He dropped off the trailer and the next day it was gone.
There was massive, massive fraud in Pennsylvania. We know it, they know it and they know that we know it.
The suspension is wrong. The New York Court is saying lawyers can only take on politically correct causes. Sickening.
************
The political timing of Rudy's suspension is no coincidence. They know these audits are going to turn up some very troubling evidence of fraud. Attacking Rudy is a proactive defensive move to counter the coming bad news.
Room 101 threat going nationwide
It’s still Free Speech. His words changed nothing. Annoying...perhaps....but nothing more.
He did not lie. That Thieving bastard Biden did not beat President Trump. But enjoy the son of a bitch. Courtesy of the Republican Party and a rat traitor named Mike Pence he is there. “There” being the White House.
Well, let’s have discovery then.
The timing of Rudy's law license suspension is highly suspicious. It occurred just as Rudy had to defend himself (he had a lawyer) in a defamation suit brought by Dominion.
Here is something to think about, something detached from Rudy's case. Why are there law licenses in the first place? You can personally defend yourself in a court of law. While lawyers do not advise this, it is completely legal. Why shouldn't that extend to anyone that you choose to defend you? Government licensing quite often is done in the name of public good and to protect people. I suspect it is also done to maintain an establishment class and create barriers of entry to a profession. Additionally, as we see in Rudy's case, a license was used to exert political will.
Personally, I do not want to limit my choices by abdicating my responsibilities to do due diligent prior to obtaining professional services. I want all available choices. I do not need to be protected from my choices. The appropriate check and balance to this is to prosecute people when they break the law. Rudy did not break the law by exercising his first Amendment right to free speech. Secondary to my personal choices being limited by licensure, I am completely against any establishment class. This is an element of pure competition (per the economic definition) which requires ease of entry and exit from markets. Lastly, I am dead set against the use of political will in legal matters. That defies the rule of law.
I know there are a few articles posted about Giuliani but this article goes into a few of the specific allegations.
The state itself not only concedes but argues that the information they had posted was variously simply outdated and for previous elections. At the time, they also argued that 3 months after the elections a number of major counties still had not provided totals for ballots received. It’s also related to PA, not NY.
This is political junk from NY.
The failure of Republican push back on the Steal is why Rudy is swinging in the wind.
Jeremy sits on the elephant of Filthadelphia political corruption while denying the existence of Filthadelphia political corruption.
The veracity of his comments has never been adjudicated. How, then, do Apellate judges make decisions about matters that have never come before the courts?
Yes, of course.
The stuff the inky cited does seem to be bogus. However. There are 29,000 more mail in votes counted than there where mail in voters who voted in DELCO. Numbers are published by the county. We need an explanation for that. Philly and pitts have the same larger problem. This has always been the issue and the failure to allow observers against the law and recklessly so have not been addressed.