Posted on 06/11/2021 12:21:09 PM PDT by Red Badger
FINALLY! The lawsuit we’ve all been waiting for! An exhaustively researched, very tightly reasoned, and persuasively pled complaint condemning the Government’s COVID-19 response was filed today in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama to hold the minute martinet, Anthony “Fluttering Fastball” Fauci and his co-conspirators at DHHS, CDC, NIH, and FDA accountable for their reign of terror over America.
Forty three named and unnamed plaintiffs led by America’s Frontline Doctors have sued Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Xavier Becerra, both personally and in his official capacity, Director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Dr. Anthony Fauci, both personally and in his official capacity, Acting Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Dr. Janet Woodcock, both personally and in her official capacity, DHHS itself, FDA itself, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute of Health (NIH), NIAID itself, and John and Jane Does I-V.
The theory of the case is that the EUAs were “the keys that unlocked the profit potential of the COVID-19 crisis,” enabling vaccine manufacturers to “reap billions of dollars in profit by exploiting the fears of the American people.” The complaint further alleges that the vaccines “have the potential to cause substantially greater harm than the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 disease” themselves.
Defendants are seeking civil money damages from Secretary Becarra, Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Woodcock personally.
The Complaint alleges that the Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) under which various “unapproved, inadequately tested, experimental, and dangerous” COVID-19 vaccines have been sold and administered are unlawful on multiple grounds and must be terminated immediately. The multiple grounds supporting termination of the EUAs, and by extension, administration of all COVID-19 vaccines, follows.
First, the Complaint alleges that the Emergency Declaration upon which the EUAs are all based was unjustified. Second, that the DHHS Secretary has failed to satisfy the “criteria for issuance” of the EUAs set forth in Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(c). Third, that the DHHS Secretary has failed to satisfy the “conditions of authorization” mandated by § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A). If the District Court finds any of these grounds to be legally sustainable, the EUAs must as a matter of law be terminated.
Plaintiffs Seek Multiple Rulings and Damages From Individual Defendants The Plaintiffs are asking the District Court to review whether there was a true “public health emergency” and to find that, since there was no such actual emergency, that DHHS did not have the authority to declare such an emergency, which would likewise nullify the EUAs.
the EUAs were “the keys that unlocked the profit potential of the COVID-19 crisis”
The Plaintiffs are also asking the District Court to determine that the EUAs and extensions thereof are unlawful based on the grounds set forth above, that the Defendants have violated customary international law by engaging in non-consensual human medical experimentation, and that they have unlawfully failed to implement protections for human subjects in medical experimentation.
They are further asking the District Court to enjoin the enforcement of the overall “public health emergency” declaration and renewals, enforcement of the EUAs, and extension of the EUAs to children under the age of 16.
Finally, the Defendants are seeking civil money damages from Secretary Becarra, Dr. Fauci, and Dr. Woodcock personally.
The case is Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-00702-CLM. A copy of the complaint follows.
Americas-Frontline-Doctors-v.-Becarra-COMPLAINT-1-FILED
https://magainstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Americas-Frontline-Doctors-v.-Becarra-COMPLAINT-1-FILED.pdf
I also would like to see a massive class action law suit by the families of COVID victims who died because therapeutics were downplayed by the media, CDC, and Fauci.
Don’t know if this is possible, but if the government and media ever deserved to be sued, this is it.
Sorry, add Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter to this suit.
Law suit against Fauci PING!
no standing... right?
You know, standing is an Article III requirement. It’s not a made up term. It serves an important constitutional function.
Since you seem to be very versed in the standing doctrine, could you articulate the organizational standing requirements that would need to be satisfied in a lawsuit like this?
If Dr. Tony has a personal financial interest in the patents associated with the virus, how can he possibly hide behind the thin curtain of being a public employee and having his good/bad/indifferent acts shielded by his employment?
Really.... time to pay the piper.
This Congress? Good luck, even if such legislation was needed to begin with.
You think congress is going to act?
You think congress is going to act?
yep!
agree
An enormous Class Action Lawsuit, involving every single person in the world is warranted. Of course that won’t happen, but, as I have always been reticent of “piling on” when something like this comes to a head, I feel that now it is indeed time to “pile on” in an altogether epic fashion. It is time to end this obscene worldwide atrocity NOW!
Also needed are criminal charges. Of course that applies to the entire ChiComjoe Executive Branch kakistocracy.
No. I have no faith in any of them.
Reagan was RIGHT...
“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help.”
Ronald Reagan
I am gonna need 10 million. My wife and I had covid.
Include the murderous governors of NY, PA, MI, IL, CA and any other state where innocents were used as pawns to get rid of Orange Man Bad.
It’s way worse now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.