Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Bill Proposes More Than $7 Billion for Rural Broadband
SuccessfulFarming ^ | 5/21/2021 | Chuck Abbott

Posted on 05/21/2021 9:16:54 AM PDT by Renfrew

Republicans on the House Agriculture Committee on Thursday proposed a three-year program with $7.35 billion in funding to bring broadband access to rural America. The bill would focus on the most remote and least served areas.

More than 20% of rural Americans lack access to high-speed internet service, says the Center for Rural Innovation.

(Excerpt) Read more at agriculture.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: broadband; ruralamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Republicans and Democrats both want big spending in this area, but the GOP reps are proposing moving it from the FCC to the Department of Agriculture.
1 posted on 05/21/2021 9:16:54 AM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

Rural Broadband may be supplanted by satellite broadband as Elon Musk is building.


2 posted on 05/21/2021 9:18:20 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

Yup—Congress just wants to throw money around and have talking points.

They couldn’t care less if real world technology makes their expeditures obsolete.


3 posted on 05/21/2021 9:20:04 AM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

But, but, but, but... What about G5?


4 posted on 05/21/2021 9:20:54 AM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

I live in rural America will limited broadband. There are solutions in progress like StarLink and government involvement is not appropriate. The money should not be spent.


5 posted on 05/21/2021 9:24:15 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

I’m rural and I’d love broadband. But it’s not the place of taxpayers who won’t benefit to pay for my broadband. Also, it makes no financial sense to have infrastructure like that when the density of potential users is so small. Follow the money. Who benefits? I’d say all those streaming companies like Disney and Netflix. (Neither of which I’d pay ten cents to keep out of bankruptcy.)


6 posted on 05/21/2021 9:24:29 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

It is not the government’s job to provide people with broadband or any other type of internet service.


7 posted on 05/21/2021 9:25:25 AM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meatspace

Correct. They cant even fix the roads and highways.


8 posted on 05/21/2021 9:26:07 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

Uhh...

Hughesnet, Starlink, OneWeb, ViaSat, Kuiper, etc etc

Lotsa people throwin billions at coverage for internet

No need for da govamint to be the venture capitalists


9 posted on 05/21/2021 9:26:24 AM PDT by Regulator (It's Fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus

I pay 178.00 a month with hughesnet. I get two days before all mine is used up. I work from home 4 days a week and live stream about 15 hours a week. That’s it. Then it comes to a crawl asking me to buy tokens. 178.00 a month!!!


10 posted on 05/21/2021 9:26:37 AM PDT by Donnafrflorida (Thru Him all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

The money won’t go into these communities.


11 posted on 05/21/2021 9:27:01 AM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rigelkentaurus

“I live in rural America will limited broadband. There are solutions in progress like StarLink and government involvement is not appropriate. The money should not be spent.”
I agree 100% with this comment.


12 posted on 05/21/2021 9:36:16 AM PDT by ocrp1982 ( Bibicly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits

“ Rural Broadband may be supplanted by satellite broadband as Elon Musk is building.”

Yes, that’s the logical, cheaper way to do this, but this is about throwing money at local governments and unions, not about high-speed internet access.


13 posted on 05/21/2021 9:37:47 AM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

$7,000,000,000 will buy 14,000,000 Starlink base stations for those too poor for that entry point. $99/month after that gives excellent internet connectivity from ANYWHERE.


14 posted on 05/21/2021 9:38:38 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (All worry about monsters that'll eat our face, but it's our job to ask why it wants to eat our face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

Our electric COOP is finally providing broadband with fiber to the home. COOPS have access to very cheap money and can legally do all sorts of things including sewers, water, trash, just about anything rural people need that is currently underserved and the coop can set up a corporation to do it with very cheap money.

I thought dumbo was going to do this? Money was appropriated and nothing ever happened. The money went somewhere.

Proposes? Rubber stamped and done. Money wasted.

Major crock of crap.


15 posted on 05/21/2021 9:47:29 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

Is it going to be free for POCs and expensive for Whitey?


16 posted on 05/21/2021 9:58:55 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Non-binary transnormativity is a construct of intersectionality. Leftist gobbledegook stinks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew; Gen.Blather

USDA Rural Development has been struggling to expand broadband coverage to rural areas at least since 2005. As you correctly stated, Gen.Blather, it makes no financial sense to have infrastructure like that when the density of potential users is so small.


17 posted on 05/21/2021 9:58:58 AM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
When I first moved into my small city adjacent to Pocatello, ID, the best "broadband" I could get was DSL at 22 Kbps symmetric. Superior to a dialup modem in 2000. Subsequently, new vendors came to town. Rooftop microwave with 15 Mbps down / 7 Mbps up arrived in 2008. Huge improvement. Rumors of fiber optic service started in 2015. A small business, Big Dog, committed to laying fiber. As a small business, they had to go slow. Get a committed base of customers, install then target another area. Fiber arrived in my neighborhood in May 2020. The 1 Gbps symmetric, no cap for $75.00 per month is very good. The vendor behind it is "TruFiber". This was all done by private business soliciting interest customers and building out. No taxpayer subsidized "programs".

The Dems just can't beak the "Santa Claus" habit. They are running the country to the poor house with all of the "generosity" financed on the taxpayer "credit card".

18 posted on 05/21/2021 10:01:39 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Renfrew

This rural American had to shell out just under $10K to have Comcast string 4/10 mile of cable.


19 posted on 05/21/2021 10:12:50 AM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
Rural Broadband may be supplanted by satellite broadband as Elon Musk is building.

I just wish it was cheaper. $100/mth is a little steep. We're paying $50/mth for the second fastest DSL plan our phone company has. Satellite is about the only other thing that's going to work where I live in the Ozarks. We barely get a cell phone signal at home and only if we stand outside in a certain spot. They would have to put many thousands of cell towers in to cover everyone in the Ozarks with 5G. They ran fiber optic cable when they installed our phone service but they haven't gotten more than a mile radius from town with the fiber service/cable and it's another 20 miles to here across rocky hilly terrain. The phone guys that installed our service said I probably wouldn't see fiber optic in my lifetime.

20 posted on 05/21/2021 10:28:15 AM PDT by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson