Posted on 05/02/2021 3:44:18 PM PDT by nickcarraway
North Carolinians can still sue a person who has an affair with their spouse, after a handful of lawmakers killed a bill that would have repealed a state law at least a century old.
In a hearing Wednesday morning, members of a House judiciary committee split in a 4-4 vote on whether to advance House Bill 485 and eliminate the state’s “criminal conversations” law. The tie vote kept the bill from moving forward.
This isn’t the first time lawmakers have attempted to remove North Carolina from a list of just six states where husbands or wives can sue a third party for having an affair with their spouse. England abolished the centuries-old law, which originated when men still considered women as property, in the 1850s.
Family, friends and neighbors view body of man killed by deputies in Elizabeth City The law is harsh, cruel and has been not been used as intended, said Rep. Billy Richardson, a Democrat from Fayetteville, in the committee hearing Wednesday.
“That’s extortion,” he said.
Democrats sponsored the legislation, signaling it likely wouldn’t have passed the Republican-majority General Assembly even if it had advanced further. At least one Republican, Rep. Jon Hardister, a Republican from Whitsett, vocally supported the bill and voted in favor of it Wednesday, however.
“I want to preserve marriages as much as the next person, but it is between two spouses,” Hardister said in the hearing.
Former state Sen. Rick Gunn, a Republican from Burlington, was sued in his final months in office, accused by his legislative assistant’s husband of having an affair with her and destroying their marriage.
The lawsuit, filed in August, said Gunn “alienated the affection” of his assistant, Karen Johns, from her husband, Arthur Johns.
In March, both Gunn and Arthur Johns’ attorney said the lawsuit was expected to be settled for an undisclosed sum. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Several people spoke against the bill in the committee Wednesday, saying if it were signed into law, North Carolina would be “legalizing adultery.”
“Marriages are worth protecting,” said Jere Royall of the North Carolina Family Policy Council.
The state passed a slight change to the law in 2009, when the state legislature was still under Democratic control. The change narrowed when someone can take action against their spouse and another person for adultery.
Still, supporters of the bill said it’s time to totally abolish the law in North Carolina.
I’d like to see statistics. I’m guessing more women availed themselves of this law, then men.
Democrats hardest hit.
Adultery should remain illegal, too bad other states have dropped this, if they had it to begin with.
It is criminal as well. See N.C.G.S. § 14-184.
How often, if ever, are people prosecuted?
Lawsuits for alienation of affections are fairly common in NC.
https://nclawyersweekly.com/2021/04/14/district-attorney-sued-in-heart-balm-lawsuit/
As for criminal prosecutions? They are rare. It is only a Class 2 Misdemeanor and the admissions or confessions of one party can’t be used as evidence against the other. So absent catching them in the act, it is hard to prosecute.
Probably.
But what is wrong with ‘centuries old laws’ ?
Vood luck trying to prove it or get anyone to care these days.
They were written by Whitey...
In maryland the fine for adultery is still $10.00. and good luck finding a lawyer who wants to prosecute for $10.00.
They should study to find out what adultery was, first, then make a law based on that.
“ but it is between two spouses,”?
I’m guessing the waffle he is eating there is very large....
So much for supporting actual marriage.
Really? Please. I can assure you this is a bipartisan issue.
They are just making that hotel rendezvous even hotter...
Funny what happens when the state encourages obedience to (one at least) the Ten Commandments.
I’d let them sue the other person AND the cheating spouse.
And no the cheating spouse would have to sell off assets of theirs. Everyone has stuff that is just theirs. Purses, shoes, boots, jewelry, collections.
I recall one or two “Alienation of Affection” lawsuits hitting the news here in NC over the past decades.
I'm guessing that more women than men assume the health risks, job compromises and personal inconveniences of pregnancy and childcare.
“I want to preserve marriages as much as the next person, but it is between two spouses,” Hardister said in the hearing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.