[thegagline]

I self-identify as a Second Amendment Sanctuary Zone.

Democrats will be triggered and attempt to pack the Court.

[DoughtyOne]

Holding my breath.

These days the SCOTUS is about as reliable as an ex spouse
at the two year mark.

[dsrtsage]

This is why we need more justices

[ThunderSleeps]

...how much protection the Second Amendment provides for carrying a gun outside the home...

Don't discriminate against the homeless, or those living in their cars/vans... The 2nd Amendment applies to US Citizens, period. It is not location sensitive.

[ClearCase_guy]

The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday it will consider how much protection the Second Amendment provides for carrying a gun outside the home.

How much? How much protection? I think the Second Amendment reads "Protection Shall Not Be Provided" or something. The Founders may have used some sort of fancy word like "infringed", but in today's language it just means you get bupkas.

[rockabyebaby]

SCOTUS is useless, we are screwed.

[Leaning Right]

The current New York law allows for concealed carry outside the home. But only if you can demonstrate a “special need”. In other words, only if you know somebody important. A cleaning lady waiting for a bus at midnight, she doesn’t know anybody important. So no permit for her.

Hopefully the Supreme Court will stand up for folks like that cleaning lady.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

“It’s a tax!” /Roberts

[MileHi]

Keep and bear = own AND carry

What’s hard or unclear about that?

[SecondAmendment]

[Nachoman]

I don’t care what SCOTUS does. I’m keeping my guns, and I’ll carry at least 1 on my person everyday.

God bless Texas!

[Pollard]

allows residents to carry a concealed handgun only if they can demonstrate a special need beyond a general desire for self protection

In any major city, the homicide rate has gone up by 50-150% in the past year. That's reason enough. Riots, reason enough.

[knarf]

[edwinland]

Yay Paul Clement!

[familyop]

I’m guessing that our Supreme Court will decide in favor of our Second Amendment rights on this issue in favor of all economic and social classes. We’ll see.

[JesusIsLord]

Requiring a law abiding citizen to acquire/buy a concealed carry license is unconstitutional. What part of 2A doesn't our SCOTUS understand?

Some states "get it" and have passed state laws allowing all law abiding citizens to CC without a license.

Our SCOTUS should have shot down all CC and open carry licensing laws long ago. 2A is a RIGHT! State laws that restrict law abiding citizens - CC and open carry - are plainly unconstitutional.

[ETCM]

This is virtually identical to the Peruta V San Diego case that SCOTUS refused to hear back when the Left ruled the court 5-4 (6-3 if counting Roberts as a liberal). If we don’t win this now, we will have lost the issue for at least a decade, maybe two, maybe forever.

I suspect we will win, but Roberts will vote with the majority. Being Chief Justice and with the majority, Roberts will then construct the Majority Decision in such a way that he dilutes and weakens the 2A, rather than finally giving us a ruling that upholds the constitution. 4 or even 5 Justices could write or sign concurring opinions that support full 2A rights, but only Roberts’ opinion will be precedent.

[vpintheak]

Necessary to a free state, shall not be infringed.
Anything and anyone else can sincerely KMA if they view it any other way.

[TBP]

If we win this, the Dhimmicraps will simply work harder at court packing.

[Theoria]