Posted on 04/03/2021 3:32:29 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
We have all been listening to Mike Lindell for the past few months about how he had irrefutable evidence of election fraud. Another BOOM is what I figured. We are all getting pretty tired of the hype. I wasn't going to bother watching it but my wife did and then we watched it together.
Maybe there is nothing we can do about it, maybe there is, but the fact is that he really does have irrefutable evidence of the election fraud. That's why not even George Soros' factcheck.org will touch it. They "debunked" the first one, but they are hoping that people who check don't realize that Mike has a second video.
Not many people have the time to watch an hour long video, so that will limit the audience.
That's why I am going to outline the most imporant parts so you can get the bullet points in a couple of minutes.
This is the real thing. The election was stolen, and it was stolen online in real time and if we don't do something about it our country is lost.
Dr. Douglas Frank holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry with over sixty scientific publications including a cover page article in Science magazine in 1990 and was on the cover of the Naturwissenschaften, in Europe.
He determined that 2010 US Census data was used to inject phantom voters into the 2020 election rolls. He proved it by going house-to-house to 1600 houses to audit 2020 voters and determined that 32% of the "voters" did not live at that address. THIS WAS NATIONWIDE, IN ALL 50 STATES.
Mike Lindell TV Releases Irrefutable Election Theft Proof on New Television Special That Features World Renowned Physicist
https://lindelltv.com/mike-lindell-tv-releases-irrefutable-election-theft-proof/
Every precinct/county in the country has a voter registration database.
In most states you can download the voter registration database for free but some states charge hefty fees.
The voter registration database shows all registered voters and their voting histories.
There were lots of (too many) voters who only voted once, in November 2020.
Hired people to go house-to-house to 1600 houses to audit 2020 voters and determined that 32% of the "voters" were "phantom" and did not live at that address.
Votes can be manufactured by having a computer algorithm that votes for registered voters who never show up to vote.
The only way to know for sure if a "voter" actually voted is to ask them.
The night of the election (and for several days before and after), White Hats were monitoring computer intrusions into the voting machine network and collecting times and MAC/IP addresses of the intruders.
You can graph the number of registered voters by age from the voter registration database.
The numbers of people who voted in each age bracket should always be substantially less (~80%) than the number of registered voters in that bracket.
Small discrepancies are disregarded by "experts"
90% or more is highly suspect.
Hamiltion County, Ohio had 95% of the population registered to vote with some ages having more voters than residents of that age.
The percent of votes cast (red curve) for each age group were exactly the same, mirroring the registered voter curve. This is almost impossible in even one county, but it happened in all 88 counties in Ohio, which could only be accomplished through a computer algorithm.
The same key was used for all 88 Ohio counties. The key is the algorithm that turns registrations into "voters." What this means is the same percentage of each age group voted in every county in Ohio.
This is the key that converted registrations to ballots in every county in Ohio. Dr. Frank took the average of fourteen Ohio counties to create the key that worked for all 88 Ohio counties. The curve is a 6th order polynomial, which makes it much easier to construct the key because only 6 numbers are required instead of 82 numbers for age 18 through 100. Along with the turnout number the algorithm can predict every county in Ohio. This allows the intruders to set up the alogorithm ahead of time.
The Stark County, Ohio voter curve shows two sharp shoulders at approximately 75 and 80 years of age. All 88 counties show this same pattern of 75 and 80 year old voters. This pattern holds up not only in Ohio, but in EVERY STATE tested so far. The gray curve is the predicted voter results from the algorithm, the red curve is the actual voter results. The correlation coefficient between the two is 1.0000, meaning it is a perfect fit.
This could only be accomplished with constant interaction between the voting machines and a supercomputer somewhere on the Internet. When Dr. Frank saw Mike Lindell's first video all the pieces fell together. Mike's group has all the evidence on the computers that were doing this, they just didn't know what those computers were doing. Dr. Frank's discovery fills in what they were doing.
The two-shoulder pattern in voting for 75 and 80 year olds shows up in Pennsylvania District O4 voting records.
The 2010 US Census data for Pennsylvania District 04 has those same two shoulders.
Q: What are the odds?
A: Zero.
2010 Population was used by the algorithm to determine phantom registrations
Graph: Registered Voters vs Population.
Bloomfield County Colorado; registrations greater than population because population decreased since 2010. More people voted than even lived there.
More people registered in 20 Colorado counties than live there because they used the 2010 US census in the algorithm and population decreased in those 20 counties.
Jackson County, Colorado; more phantom voters than live there because population decreased since 2010.
Knocked on doors and determined that 32% of voters did not live there.
Anybody can get their county's voter registration database and conduct their own audit of people who only voted in the 2020 Presidential election.
THIS IS THE BIGGEST CRIME IN HISTORY. WE MUST GET RID OF THE COMPUTERIZED VOTING MACHINES.
It is well-known that Democrats have committed vote fraud in every election for decades.
Why would this election be any different?
The ballots cast has the same curve as registered voters except for a smaller percentage of the younger voters and a higher percentage of older voters. How is that evidence of fraud? What is a "correlation factor" of 1.000? Someone else asked for the algorithm, I woulld say I don't want to know. This whole thing is a complete waste of time. The physics guy was not convincing, and Mike Lindell knows absolutely nothing.
I am an American citizen
Even after you got kicked out?
An oversight no doubt.
I left, rather than subject myself to Obama’s misrule. Hollyweirdos keep “threatening” to do so, I did it, fulfilling a lifelong dream of living in the Holy Land.
I do what I can
Why? You’re a foreigner. Tend your own garden.
As aforementioned, while everyone’s a foreigner somewhere, I am no stranger to the US of A. As to why, I honestly thought that Americans were too smart to vote for Odumbo twice, so didn’t bother voting in 2012. Then I discovered that 1. such was not the case, there will always be enough dumbasses to elect leftards; and 2. that a leftist POTUS could do more damage to my adopted country than the Prime Minster ever could if he were working at it. So I am tending my own garden. I am a big bad foreigner out to interfere in American elections. Try to stop me./s
“I can do more by writing, because I’m good at it.
Who told you that? They lied.”
The publications that occasionally carry my occasional writing.
https://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm?frm=190231&sec_id=190231
“Are you good at anything?
Yep.”
I can see you’re real proud of it, which is why you’re so forthcoming.
So what could it be? Not insulting strangers from behind the safety of your computer screen. You really suck at that.
Chugging beer? Maybe.
Wankery? Never seen you in action, so I can’t tell.
What else do you do?
There’s a mathematician on Youtube who pretty roundly debunked all of this algorithm nonsense.
What pattern? Registered voter curve shape? They are all different. The relationship between the ballots cast and registered voter curve? Those are all different too, at least in the County A, County B, Count C examples. There's an allegation of a common algotithm relating ballots cast to registered voters? There's no evidence of any algorithm.
There is a general tendency, shown in all the curves for a smaller percentage of younger registered voters to cast ballots than older registered voters. But that's been true for a long time.
I have never heard of you before.
“The fraud that did occur happened with mail in ballots.”
Mike isn’t talking about that!
He is talking and says he has the proof, of FOREIGN countries manipulating the ballot counts in real time over the Internet.
Constantly trying to adjust the totals to not exceed the possible. They mostly succeeded but not totally. The anomalies stand out to people like Dr. Frank (and others) a whole lot smarter than me.
The “people” will never be able to understand what Mike is putting out there. It may be 100% true, but if nobody but math experts and statistical wizards can understand it, what use is it?
We got 8 years of a FAKE president because people couldn’t understand the difference between being a “citizen” and a “natural born citizen”.
I’m dense. Sometimes I catch it, but most of the time it goes right over my head. Most of the time you have to draw me a picture.
Mostly I stay away from Youtube so I don't waste any time watching idiots debunking each other. But I did watch that anarchist punk fall off the bank building onto the concrete. That was great.
Now I strongly suggest watching this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aVrly1bSq0
It is important that research continues for future ammunition against cheating. It won’t put Trump back in, but ut us important to have as much evudence to teach pols & the public what happened & will keep happening unless the GOP wises up.
“The only way to know for sure if a “voter” actually voted is to ask them. “
BINGO! I have been saying that right along. No so called audit is worth much without auditing the voter database of those who supposedly voted. This can only be done by contacting each voter and asking them questions.
It would have been more fun to watch if he’d fallen on his head.
Exactly. When does the thumb-twiddling stop?
Sadly Trump had it all and did nothing. Didn’t activate the Insurrection Act and arrest them and hang them. Thus we have lost our Republic, our Liberty
..
The black lines are voter registrations. The red lines are votes cast. They are all nearly in perfect correlation not just in their own chart, but among the various charts. It is evidence of “intelligence” not randomness.
Well we’ll have to start with the next three generations then
Ok, so what? It’s not going to put Trump in office.
And according to the video, they did exactly that. They randomly contacted about 1600 (if I remember the number correctly) and found that 32% of them did not live at the address - and yet votes were cast in their names. Some fraud does exist. 32% vote fraud is either massive human intervention or computer generated votes. The Doctor's hypothesis is that the machines knew pertinent information such as the name, address and voting history of the person registered. If the person registered had a tendency not to vote, then the machine could "fill in the ballot" for them with a certain degree of probability that nobody would come back to challenge it. And of course, if the person did show up and vote the machine could just "switch" to another person on the list of low probability voters. Hence you see in the charts certain blips or overlaps where more votes were cast in specific age groups than there were people registered in that group. Especially in the older groups (on the right side where the red and black lines intersect).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.