Wasn't this already done a few hundred centuries ago? Over in the Mideast somewhere??
Posted on 03/02/2021 3:45:00 AM PST by Kaslin
The great tragedy of our time is that liberals vote left.
Virtually every value liberals have held for a century is now held by conservatives and scorned by leftists. Therefore, America, in serious jeopardy of being lost, will be saved when people convince the liberals in their life that the left, not the conservative, is their enemy.
This process begins by establishing whether a friend or relative is a liberal or a leftist. If it turns out that he or she is a liberal, it is worth engaging in respectful dialogue on the issues of the day. If the friend or relative is a leftist, you can probably only talk about innocuous subjects such as the weather (though not about global warming) or sports (though not about players taking a knee during the national anthem). If you talk about the great issues of the day with a left-wing friend or relative, that could be the last time you talk to each other. He or she is likely to unfriend you not only on social media but also in life. Leftists generally do not dialogue; they dismiss.
Here are questions you might want to pose to friends/relatives to determine -- as much for them as for you -- whether they are liberal or left.
Race
1. Many universities now have all-black dormitories, and some have all-black graduation exercises. Do you support these developments?
2. The University of California has declared this statement racist: "There is only one race -- the human race." Do you agree with the University of California, or do you agree with the statement?
3. Is the goal of being "colorblind" -- doing one's best to ignore a person's color and concentrating only on the person's character and personality -- a noble goal or a racist one?
4. Do you believe the color of a person's skin tells you anything of importance about that person?
5. Do you agree that all white Americans are racist?
6. If your answer is yes, would you tell the millions of blacks in Africa and the Caribbean who wish to emigrate to America that they would be making a poor decision? If not, why not?
7. Is it possible for a black person to be a racist?
8. Is it racist to claim that Johann Sebastian Bach, Ludwig van Beethoven and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart composed the greatest music ever composed?
9. Is the national anthem racist?
10. If your answer is yes, what would you like to put in its place?
11. The English Department at the University of Pennsylvania removed its painting of William Shakespeare because he was a white European male. Do you agree with that decision?
America
12. Do you agree with The New York Times' "1619 Project" that America was not founded in 1776 but in 1619 with the first arrival of black slaves in North America, and that the Revolutionary War was fought in order to preserve slavery?
13. Should statues of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln be taken down?
14. Has the United States, overall, made the world a better place?
15. Would America be better, worse, or the same as now if all Americans dropped their religion and became secular?
16. Has capitalism been a net-plus for America and the world?
17. Everyone would like to improve America. Some would like to, in their words, "fundamentally transform" it. Would you?
18. Could a good person have voted for Donald Trump in 2020?
19. Do you believe that CNN, The Washington Post, The New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media are biased toward the left or try to present the news as accurately as possible?
20. Should America have full control over its borders to prevent illegal immigration?
21. There are between 11 and 30 million people in America who entered the country illegally. Should they all be put on a path to citizenship?
22. Should those who enter America illegally be called "undocumented immigrants" or "illegal immigrants"?
23. Do you believe police departments should be defunded, or at least have their budgets severely cut?
24. Should the government provide vouchers to enable parents to choose what school their child attends?
25. Which school do you believe is more likely to be attacked by a gunman: one that has a sign in front that reads, "Gun-Free Zone" or one that reads, "This School Has Armed Personnel"?Men and Women
26. Should it be legal for a teenage girl to have her breasts surgically removed because she identifies as a male -- or should there be a minimum age of 18 or 21?
27. School teachers have been told to stop calling students "boys and girls" because a student might not identify as either male or female. Do you agree with this policy?
28. Should biological males who identify as females be allowed to compete against biological females in sports?
29. Is the statement, "Men give birth" science-based?
30. Do you agree with the practice of inviting a drag queen into public libraries and elementary school classrooms to conduct a "Drag Queen Story Hour"?
Speech
31. Do you believe that free speech allows for hate speech, or should hate speech be banned?
32. If you believe hate speech should be banned, who do you believe should determine what is hate speech?
You might want to send these questions to the people in your life whose views are to the left of your own. At best, you (and they) will realize that you have more in common than either of you previously thought. At the very least, their answers will bring you both clarity. And at worst, they will explain why there is a rift between you -- and why you might want to restrict communication to weather, sports, recipes and warm memories.
The list has too many questions. Just ask if they are members of the democrat party.
Bump
Sure - but think of how many people today feel entitled to money from the gubmint - and WE are the ones supplying that money.
The Amazon HQ2 debacle in NYC really highlighted this; a company offered a lot of good jobs (from which both the city and state of NY would reap INCOME TAXES) in exchange for property tax breaks, and a collection of misfits opposed it because they didn’t want JOBS - they simply wanted the “free sh!t” the property taxes would bring.
Social Security and programs like unemployment or disability are in a different category because funds have been drawn from peoples’ paychecks to fund them; people who never worked don’t collect unemployment.
People who feel taxpayers are required to provide food, clothing, and shelter beyond the most basic humanitarian requirements are in a different league than those benefiting from programs they themselves funded. Our permanent underclass is massive because multiple generations have now grown up without a single working person in the household.
And the left finds it a useful term to keep our side from ever understand what is actually happening. And Prager finds it useful to keep our side from ever understanding.
They are ready to permanently enslave us, and we want to engage in Socratic dialogue? This is why we are losing so badly, with no hope in sight.
I disagree. I don’t think using terms like that keep us from understanding what is going on.
Their deliberate attempts (which are often successful) to control language and symbols are a problem because many people don’t understand they are doing it for a purpose.
And that is what keeps us from “understanding” what is going on. The first step is paying attention, the second step is breaking it down, and breaking it down using any and all methods including the Socratic method isn’t the issue.
The issue is not paying attention.
Screwed?
I see them all the time at my local wallyworld.
Dudes open carrying, too.
away from Indy; it is overwhelming RED!!!
or;
Does what a person says mean more than the way they say it?
Mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.