Posted on 02/25/2021 6:53:22 PM PST by Kid Shelleen
The New York Times has buried numerous important and relevant pieces of information in its latest high-profile story regarding the shooting death of Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt. The Times’ story seems to intentionally shrouds the mysterious circumstances surrounding Babbitt’s death to protect a trio of unknown, shadowy or radical figures who were involved in the fatal incident. ----SNIP---- Despite the extraordinary video, conveniently captured by an Antifa-supporting activist named John Sullivan, there have been very few attempts by major media outlets to dissect what really happened with the shooting of the Trump supporter
(Excerpt) Read more at beckernews.com ...
* NY Times never ID's John Sullivan who shouted “Hey guys, I have a knife,”
* It was Sullivan who shouted repeatedly that “there is a gun,”
* An agitator named Zachary Jordan Alam. His name was never mentioned. He used a helmet to broke out the windowpane in front of Ms. Babbitt.
* The unknown shooter screamed ‘Stay back! Stay back! Don’t come in here!’”. The decision to shoot Ashli Babbitt has been chalked up as a “split second” decision; but one can see from the video that the woman was warned and the man held aloft his gun for at least fifteen seconds before shooting.
Can you post the videos that show that?
He could have stopped her with one hand.
He didn’t need to shoot her.
The warning is nice. But you don’t get to shoot someone for a non-violent felony such as breaking and entering or trespass.
It’s murder. But he’s an immigrant from Brazil and exceedingly poorly trained as a member of the DC police. He’s a glorified butler for his career and one day got tested in actual cop conditions... and failed. So to him he thinks it’s legal.
Exactly, if he gave a verbal why did he preclude going hands on? She was unarmed, the others could not easily assist her, and she was in an awkward position physically.
If this was any local cop anywhere but DC, he would be headed to prison. Bad shoot.
They had to kill someone as part of it.
Was she was surrounded by her handlers the whole way?
I wonder what they were telling her?
The whole reason why there is a shroud of secrecy regarding the Ashli Babbitt murder is very simple. Leftists and the media are using this to inflame the wild conspiracy theories that Ashley Babbitt isn’t really dead.
That this was just an act.
what the hell is beckersnews?
Sullivan’s dad ran the AF nukes.
how many want to Antifa?
how many?
Sullivans all get ‘free passes’ for blowing up
the Capitol, instigating sedition, practicing sedition,
attacking using the blackrobes, and free passes for them
all even when dealing sedition and nukes.
anyone follow it up in the DO”J”? unlikely.
they are free to do it again.
it was Sullivan Jr.s THIRD attack and each time
he went free EVEN with murders.
>> why was he even IN the hall???
Many of his colleagues were also in the hall. It was a show. And Ashli may have been part of it.
bump
Masako Ganaha claims the agitators were stirring up the crowd by telling them Babbit was shot dead. Ganaha also claims she often saw Leftists in Japan using similar methods (Marxist tactics) to agitate the crowd (agitation propaganda).
I watched the first video.
She was concerned with the Antifavagitators.
She did not really analyze the shooting.
I did not see anything that would change my mind.
Ashli Babbitt did not need to be shot.
.
did she have a red shirt on???
Why didn’t the fake SWAT team provide CPR?
Why didn’t anyone jump or call EMTs?
Why was there no blood of any amount from a neck wound?
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.