Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fact check: No, impeachment itself would not ban Trump from a 2024 presidential run
abc7.com Eyewitness News Los Angeles ^ | Monday, January 11, 2021 6:17PM | CNNWire By Daniel Dale

Posted on 01/11/2021 6:53:47 PM PST by higgmeister

Even a Senate vote to remove Trump would not prohibit him from running in 2024; for the Senate to ban him from the presidency, it would have to hold an additional vote on this question.

(Excerpt) Read more at abc7.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2024; idiotpelosi; impeachment; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: butlerweave

not the point


21 posted on 01/11/2021 7:15:13 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OrioleFan

‘Hopefully the pubbies in the Senate aren’t that stupid to think the party can win without us.’

are you saying that if oeone other than Trump runs in ‘24, you will sit it out and let the dems run with it...?


22 posted on 01/11/2021 7:15:21 PM PST by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

“Trump has few friends.”

Im one of his 80 million “friends”.


23 posted on 01/11/2021 7:16:48 PM PST by max americana (FIRED LEFTARD employees at our office every election since 2008 and enjoyed seeing them cry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative; MinuteGal

“If I understood Professor Dershowitz correctly in an interview he gave a day or two ago any Senate “conviction” that might occur after he leaves office would have no legal weight whatsoever and would,in fact,be blatantly unconstitutional.”

Unless the Dems stack the Supreme Court. Then there IS no Constitution.


24 posted on 01/11/2021 7:18:56 PM PST by flaglady47 (Donald Trump, President in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister
The only way Trump will be able to run in 2024 is if they allow him to run for a 3rd term. Yeah, you read that right.

Took 18 posts, but right on. I was going from reply to reply to find any that reflected your thinking.

25 posted on 01/11/2021 7:19:32 PM PST by C210N (You can trust government or you can understand history. But you CANNOT do both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Beave Meister

‘Yeah, you read that right.’

is that correct...? I didn’t think of that; Cleveland did not run after his first term, but ran a second time and won four years later...


26 posted on 01/11/2021 7:19:55 PM PST by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
Would have to get those cheating voting machines repaired first.

Going back to the point.   As the headline states "impeachment itself would not ban Trump from a 2024 presidential run", there this last days attempt to Impeach is insane. I am not even concerned with whether the President runs in 2024. I am pointing out that the attempt to block a penitential run for the President in the future is ludicrous.

27 posted on 01/11/2021 7:21:00 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
IIf I understood Professor Dershowitz correctly in an interview he gave a day or two ago any Senate “conviction” that might occur after he leaves office would have no legal weight whatsoever and would,in fact,be blatantly unconstitutional

It has never been done at the presidential level, but there is precedent for impeaching someone after they left office.

The Supreme Court has in the past ruled that the power of impeachment lies solely with the House of Representatives, and in not subject to court review.

28 posted on 01/11/2021 7:22:15 PM PST by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister
OK, now tell me what would the enforcement of that vote entail to prevent him from taking office if he was duly elected? I do not believe it exists.

C'mon, really? In order to be sworn in as President, you have to be eligible under the Constitution. 35 years old, natural born citizen, and not have been impeached, found guilty, and had the penalty imposed by the Senate.

Under your logic, if AOC were 'duly elected' then she should be sworn in as President, even though she is not yet 35 years of age.

29 posted on 01/11/2021 7:25:29 PM PST by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

They will not be able to convict before the 20th. And you cannot bar a private citizen from running for office.

MAGA 2024. See you in the camps.

Hey, maybe Freepers will get their own camp. Wont that be fun.

Except HummerGrumbler. He is a killjoy.


30 posted on 01/11/2021 7:27:53 PM PST by joshua c (Jan 20th is Dump Day. Dump them all. Twitter, Facebook, Google, Amazon, cable tv etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans

King or kingmaker. A Trump endorsement will be gold.


31 posted on 01/11/2021 7:30:25 PM PST by joshua c (Jan 20th is Dump Day. Dump them all. Twitter, Facebook, Google, Amazon, cable tv etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joshua c
Mu

In an election with no fraud.

32 posted on 01/11/2021 7:31:21 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Dershowitz is a democrat but he is a constitutional lawyer first.

On Constitutional issues, he is very reliable.


33 posted on 01/11/2021 7:32:02 PM PST by joshua c (Jan 20th is Dump Day. Dump them all. Twitter, Facebook, Google, Amazon, cable tv etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

No!

I *want* to go back to having spineless, politically correct, weathervane RINO candidates who stand for nothing and bow to everything!

/said no one, ever


34 posted on 01/11/2021 7:34:41 PM PST by Salamander (We're All Hamlet, Now....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lopeover

They’re bastards, alright.


35 posted on 01/11/2021 7:35:50 PM PST by Salamander (We're All Hamlet, Now....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Actually, the Articles of Impeachment against Hastings did not include prohibition from holding an office in the future. They all end with the phrase “Wherefore, Judge Alcee L. Hastings is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office.”

The Article of Impeachment against Trump does include that additional penalty: “Donald John Trump thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.”

The specific punishment is included with the Article of Impeachment, so any conviction on the Article includes the punishment.


36 posted on 01/11/2021 7:36:13 PM PST by scouter (As for me and my household... We will serve the LORD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joethedrummer

Not count them or report them.


37 posted on 01/11/2021 7:36:16 PM PST by RightLady (Save Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: max americana
I'm one of his 80 million “friends”

The one thing the lamestreaming-deepstaters fear more than Trump are all of his followers.

For real.

38 posted on 01/11/2021 7:36:18 PM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
C'mon, really? In order to be sworn in as President, you have to be eligible under the Constitution. 35 years old, natural born citizen, and not have been impeached, found guilty, and had the penalty imposed by the Senate.

Where did you read that?

Article II section 1 only states:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
The rest you appear to have added because it's not on the Constitution. &nbnsp; So I should give back to you, "C'mon, really?"
39 posted on 01/11/2021 7:36:50 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: joshua c
They will not be able to convict before the 20th. And you cannot bar a private citizen from running for office.

They can impeach, convict, and punish Trump after he leaves office. Part of the punishment phase of impeachment severs lifetime pension payments, so it is allowed to impeach an office holder after they leave office if impeachable offenses come to light after they leave office.

40 posted on 01/11/2021 7:37:24 PM PST by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson