Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to California Requiring Nonprofit Donor Lists
The Epoch Times ^ | JANUARY 10, 2021 | Matthew Vadum

Posted on 01/10/2021 5:01:20 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Nicholson/File Photo/Reuters) The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal from two conservative charities that fundraise in California, challenging demands by that state for a list of financial contributors, which the Trump administration argues violates the two tax-exempt groups’ constitutionally protected freedom of association.

The appeals concern then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris’s conduct in office. Currently, a U.S. senator representing the Golden State, Harris is scheduled to be sworn in as vice president on Jan. 20.

The case is Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Becerra, and a companion case, Thomas More Law Center v. Becerra, which have been consolidated and will be heard together by the court on a date that’s yet to be decided. The Trump administration had urged the high court to take the case in a friend-of-the-court brief.

Americans for Prosperity Foundation (AFPF) and its sister organization, Americans for Prosperity, are influential libertarian-conservative nonprofits funded by businessman Charles Koch and his late brother David Koch that have chapters across the country. The Thomas More Law Center—not to be confused with the Chicago-based public interest law firm, the Thomas More Society—is a conservative Christian public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The center is represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom.

“All Americans should be free to organize around deeply held beliefs,” Emily Seidel, CEO of AFPF, said in a statement. “Stripping citizens of their privacy is a tool wielded by some in political power to silence their opposition and stifle individuals from engaging in educational and charitable efforts.

“Tens of thousands of Americans each year participate in AFPF’s educational programs, which inspire them to make a greater impact in their community and our country.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bidenvoters; kamalaharris
FULL TEXT OF ARTICLE

https://outline.com/GvYTYA

1 posted on 01/10/2021 5:01:20 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Roberts is actually going to hear a case? wonder how he has be has been instructed to rule on this one


2 posted on 01/10/2021 5:06:26 PM PST by DOC44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Roberts is actually going to hear a case? wonder how he has be has been instructed to rule on this one


3 posted on 01/10/2021 5:06:26 PM PST by DOC44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOC44
Roberts is actually going to hear a case? wonder how he has be has been instructed to rule on this one

So tough for him now with his three little ones—Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett—all squawking for attention. Roberts has to decide which one gets to be the 5th vote against conservatives in this one while assuring the other two that they will get their turns.

4 posted on 01/10/2021 5:10:14 PM PST by Dahoser (Not separation of church and state, but of media and state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So the Supreme Court has time to hear this case, but won’t hear about voter fraud?


5 posted on 01/10/2021 5:12:41 PM PST by EvilCapitalist (We must FIGHT, I repeat it sir, we must FIGHT! -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

Good grief. The petitioners don’t even have standing.


6 posted on 01/10/2021 5:15:44 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ahe stil has not given up her senate seat.

This in itself is telling.


7 posted on 01/10/2021 5:17:18 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

why are they not arrested for their TREASON and SEDITION,
coverup of child rape, coverup of ELECTION FRAUD,
and their planning to MURDER Judge Scalia?

SCOTUS <== protectors of rapists, traitors, and
Election Fraud from Roberts’ Malta and Rome.


8 posted on 01/10/2021 5:18:02 PM PST by Diogenesis ("when a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Of two minds on this as I would LOVE to have Dem groups’ contributors lose their anonymity.


9 posted on 01/10/2021 5:23:18 PM PST by mrsmith (US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
...I would LOVE to have Dem groups’ contributors lose their anonymity.

Ain't gonna happen.

10 posted on 01/10/2021 5:24:51 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (You are in far more danger from an authoritarian government than you are from a seasonal virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DOC44

depends on who pays the most ..


11 posted on 01/10/2021 5:25:59 PM PST by aces (and )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

bookmark


12 posted on 01/10/2021 5:28:10 PM PST by GOP Poet (Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

“Of two minds on this as I would LOVE to have Dem groups’ contributors lose their anonymity.”

Oh, no no no, this only applies to dangerous far right extremist radicals!


13 posted on 01/10/2021 5:35:08 PM PST by milemark (non blogger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DOC44

《The state’s policy is to keep the information confidential but there are no legal penalties for breaching confidentiality.》

There you have it. Dox donors and you’ll get a stern talking to.


14 posted on 01/10/2021 5:56:52 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Sta, si cum canibus magnis currere non potes, in portico. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DOC44

Andrew Cuomo already tagged the relevance of the SC.


15 posted on 01/10/2021 6:06:24 PM PST by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

..............I think tens of millions of people forever lost confidence in the Supreme Court given their obvious cowardice concerning the election.


16 posted on 01/10/2021 6:17:00 PM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal from two conservative charities ...”

These lazy losers agreed to hear something? But never mind a stolen election..the President had no standing.


17 posted on 01/10/2021 6:20:37 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Fuck the Supreme Court. Bunch of useless ass holes. That includes...all 9 of them.


18 posted on 01/10/2021 6:31:38 PM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOC44

He will hear it to make sure all conservatives are outed.
“That’s a nice wife and newborn baby you have there. Would be a shame if something were to happen to them.”


19 posted on 01/10/2021 6:35:34 PM PST by Organic Panic (Flinging poo is not a valid argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson