Fact Check: Georgia Senate Masquerades Failed Treasure Hunter as Hacker and Election Security Expert

Secretary Of State of Georgia ^ | Dec 31, 2020 | Secretary Of State Georgia

[New Perspective]

(ATLANTA)-Yesterday, during a Georgia State Senate hearing, failed treasure hunter, J. Hutton Pulitzer, or Commander Pulitzer (no record of military experience), claimed that he had “hacked” Georgia’s voting system.

[an amused spectator]

"Your effort is to obfuscate the main point of Pulitzer’s testimony."

Looks like it to me.

[LilFarmer]

I thought it was, I cannot find the link though so take with a grain of salt.

I did find this:

The Superior Court of Fulton County is set to hear a petition next week from a group of Georgian voters demanding a “forensic inspection” of mail-in ballots in the county from November’s presidential election.

“We have just received notice that we will be granted a hearing Monday, Jan. 4 at 11 a.m. on our Emergency Petition to visually inspect and forensically examine all Fulton County mail-in ballots,” Garland Favorito, one of the petitioners, told The Epoch Times. “That includes those processed at State Farm Arena and those that auditors detected as potentially fraudulent.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/georgia-court-to-hear-on-petition-to-inspect-fulton-county-absentee-ballots_3639711.html

So it doesn’t appear to be a done deal, sadly.

[poconopundit]

Hey LilFarmer, I plan to pay a visit to the Georgia State House on January 6th. Any FReepers going? Wonder if any speeches or events are planned.

[Fury]

His point was that they are connected to the internet, and it had to be hacked to confirm that it was connected while voting in the Senate runoff election was proceeding in real time. He said, we have a full team working on this.

He did some jackassin' - he can provide the data. Otherwise it's just talk.

Why is that so hard to understand?

[ggudermuth]

Have the ballots been provided? Can’t examine them if you don’t have them

[spacejunkie2001]

Thanks for that. Hopefully a small step to the final green light.

[hawkaw]

Bkmk

[Robert DeLong]

When and if he is called to testify, he will provide what he has documented, provided he is granted immunity from prosecution. Hacking is an illegal act, even if no damage was the result.

Why is that so hard for you to understand?

[mbj]

Republicans would like to be heard in court, at which time they would present their evidence.

But they will not be heard by the judiciary, because no one in the world has standing.

[OIFVeteran]

There have been four cases were they actually presented evidence. One of the most interesting one was decided by a federal district court judge who is a conservative. Here’s what he said;

“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” Brann wrote, so much that the court would have no option but to stop the certification even though it would impact so many people. “That has not happened.”

https://www.wfla.com/news/politics/judge-throws-out-trump-lawsuit-to-block-votes-in-pennsylvania/

[OIFVeteran]

Don’t you know that we don’t need any proof. If they are saying that the election was stolen then it was. If they are saying the election was not stolen then they are part of the deep state. It’s really that simple.

[Fury]

That does make things much more simple. Thanks!

[Fury]

Why is that so hard for you to understand?

We'll see how it goes. I'm skeptical of what he claims happened - talk is cheap.

I reminded of Colonel Flagg on MASH who when asked a question about some such thing or another, just answered "Classified". Shut any inquiry right down.

[Chumdad]

All one needs to do is check online for his bio. His claims on his patents and background are real. This proves to me the Georgia Secretary of State is in on the steal.

[Chumdad]

While not always the best source here is What Wikipedia says about Pulitzer. They back up his credentials as the patent holder on scanners and bar codes. Here is who contributed to his online bio.

This is a professional biography that has been assembled exclusively using national third party cited references per Wikipedia Standards. The over 700 cited 3rd

party sources utilized to electronically assemble this professional biography include: Wikipedia, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Academia.edu, Security & Exchange Commission, NASDAQ, Patent Genius, IP Watchdog, History.com, CNET, AdAge, Broadcasting and Cable Magazine, Forbes, Newsweek, Business Insider, Amazon, Dallas Morning News, Bloomberg News, The Guardian, Investopedia, Washington Post, PC World, Yahoo News, Yahoo Finance, Tech Times Magazine, USA Today, Poynter.org, Fortune Magazine, Business Journal, LA Times, Harvard Business Journal, Clickz, Geek.com, Wired Magazine, BrightHub, Mashable, Gizmodo, CalTech, HighBeam, NY Post, Silicon Investor, Verison.com, Media Post, Smithsonian, CW Honors, WebCitation, Macworld, Google Books, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Google Patents, RPX Corp, Apple.com, The Verge, PC World, The Telegraph UK, Variety, New Yorker Magazine, People Magazine, AOL, New Yorker Magazine, Chronicle Herald, ZDNet, Cato.org, Daily Mail UK, The Boston Standard, Free Library and other known media outlets.

[bitt]

p

[The Westerner]

This is the lowest blow yet! I could hardly follow the brilliant inventor as he labored to make the complex elementary enough for simpletons to follow. There’s an old saying going through my mind...something like “nothing so blind as those who will not see...”?

[Swordmaker]

Proof of the inordinately high percentage of Fulton County votes which had to be "adjudicated" in the November 3, 2020 election. It was worse than I recalled! Normal and historic levels of adjudication are below 5% of all ballots submitted! This is from testimony presented to the Georgia Senate hearing:

Based on a statement from Richard Barron, director of Fulton County Board of Election and Registration, ballot adjudications happened substantially in the county, which has the largest population in the Peach State.

“We scanned 113,130 as of moments ago, we’ve adjudicated 106,000 plus [93.7 percent] of those,” he can be seen saying in a video clip. “The only ballots that are adjudicated are if we have a ballot with a contest on it in which there’s some question as to what, how the computer reads it. So the vote review panel then determines voter intent.”

93.7% of Fulton County votes had had to be adjudicated because the Dominion system scanners had problems scanning them, so a human being (Democrat Election Operative) had to adjust the intent of the voter to allow that ballot to be counted, with no Republican oversight, and apparently no audit trail!

[The Westerner]

“He’s not interested in the computer, it’s the ballots he wants to examine.”

Thank you, Robert! The SOS cleverly changed the subject!

Pulitzer explained that he can detect within a couple of hours of “nano” level analysis exactly where the ballot was printed and much more!

If SOS of Georgia and all the wise men on here think Pulitzer is full of hot air, please explain why Fulton County started shredding these ballots right after Pulitzer’s testimony?

I, too, want to see evidence! But evidence must be presented at the right time and place. We’ve been watching disorganized but highly believable stories in Guiliani’s presentations. We need our day “in Court”.

[thinden]

Maybe the GA SOS should send in crowdstrike to save the day??