[Fury]

His point was that they are connected to the internet, and it had to be hacked to confirm that it was connected while voting in the Senate runoff election was proceeding in real time. He said, we have a full team working on this.

He did some jackassin' - he can provide the data. Otherwise it's just talk.

Why is that so hard to understand?

[Robert DeLong]

When and if he is called to testify, he will provide what he has documented, provided he is granted immunity from prosecution. Hacking is an illegal act, even if no damage was the result.

Why is that so hard for you to understand?

[OIFVeteran]

Don’t you know that we don’t need any proof. If they are saying that the election was stolen then it was. If they are saying the election was not stolen then they are part of the deep state. It’s really that simple.