MOTION OF DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, TO INTERVENE IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AS CANDIDATE FOR RE-ELECTION, PROPOSED BILL OF COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE

SCOTUS ^ | 12/9/2020

[tarpit]

Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, respectfully seeks leave to intervene in the pending original jurisdiction matter of State of Texas v. Com-monwealth of Pennsylvania,et al., No. 22O155 (filed Dec. 7, 2020). Plaintiff in Intervention seeks leave to file the ac-companying Bill of Complaint in Intervention against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the States of Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin (“Defendant States”), challenging their administration of the 2020 presidential election.

[lightman]

Pennsylvania Ping!

Please ping me with articles of interest.

FReepmail me to be added to the list.

[MomwithHope]

Nice!

[tarpit]

Here is a link to BRIEF OF STATE OF MISSOURI AND 16 OTHER STATES AS AMICI CURIAEIN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT

[RWGinger]

Thanks
I wish I understood more

[MHGinTN]

The president has joined the Texas cure.

[V K Lee]

Ping!

[eyeamok]

This is Great News, but when do the Public Hangings commence???

[rainee]

This must’ve been what he was hinting about on his earlier Tweet

[Paulie]

I take it this is good, but what does it mean?

[JonPreston]

That’s our fighting president!

[rainee]

Does this strengthen the fact that they have standing now?

[deadrock]

I am I right in thinking this is not about the fraud, but about states illegally extending election day, with or without mail-in ballots?

[Guenevere]

Trump Bump!

[Secret Agent Man]

hopefully very early second term

[Dr. Franklin]

As set forth in the accompanying brief and Complaint in Intervention, election officials in each of the Defendant States altered or otherwise failed to enforce state election laws in the conduct of the 2020 election. The violations of state election law, which is the “manner” the Legislatures of the States have established for choosing presidential electors, violates the Electors Clause of the U.S. Constitution and thus this matter arises under federal law. See Bush v Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 113 (2000) (“significant departure from the legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors presents a federal constitutional question”) (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring). Moreover, as explained more fully in the complaint filed by Texas, the number of ballots affected by illegal conduct of state elections officials greatly exceeds the current margin between Plaintiff in Intervention and his opponent in the election for the Office of President in each of the respective Defendant States, and the four Defendant States collectively have a sufficient number of electoral votes to affect the result of the vote in the Electoral College for the Office of President. Proposed Plaintiff in Intervention therefore clearly has a stake in the outcome of this litigation.

This Court should grant leave to file the Complaint in Intervention.

December 9, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

John C. Eastman

[max americana]

Wow. Could you make the font LARGER? It’s too small..

[Son House]

We may finally see some of that software/algorithm issue the legislatures and election
officials should have already got to the bottom of before certifying the vote.

Watch at 8:00m, 22:00m, 27:00, for about 3 to 4 minutes to get some big ideas,

42:00m Summarizes how the algorithm works

Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed
https://rumble.com/vblspz-smoking-gun-part-2-ratio-transfers-proved-entire-algorithm-reversed-net-200.html

Part of the Summary Description at Video link;

Quote

“That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.

10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct).”

Other highlight points in the video;

66:00m Real Evidence about 6 to 8 minutes long

88:30m Reverse engineering the wheel

105:00m Well balanced wheel

106:00m More evidence as wheel folds in like a fan

134:30m The tree re-balancing may be related to the roll back of votes counts seen

139:00m Summation formula of splitting the load between precincts

140:00 The wheel number

[Oorang]

Wow. Font size is the hill on which you choose to fight?

[chuckee]

His intervention as the candidate affected by the illegality of the 4 states gives Texas and other states joining them insurance that the case cannot be dismissed for lack of standing by these states as Trump has standing as the party singularly impacted by the illegality. No one has more standing than him. The SC will be forced to rule on the merits