Posted on 12/08/2020 5:50:24 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Edited on 12/08/2020 6:03:18 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
SCOTUS has voted 6-3 to hear the Texas lawsuit.
Washington Pundit ©
@TWPundit
·
9m
The 6-3 SCOTUS RULING came to us as personal
communication from a trusted source. Since we could
not find an official declaration, we removed the
post. Praying it will come to fruition.
Link changed to the above messege.
Admin Moderator
Not the vote on the case
Understood, but Roberts may be signaling which way he will vote on the case.
How?
Don’t listen to him on the radio that much as I use to and in the past I never missed him.
I do watch to him most of the time on FOX. He went anti-Trump in the beginning but he came around.
I didn’t like Trump in the beginning, voted against putting Cankles and the rapist back in the White House. Now I’m broken glass on steroids for him.
He woke America.
Fake news. The Court granted the defendant states until Thursday to respond to Texas's request to file a complaint.
ROTFLOL
There will be civil unrest if this isn’t corrected. I don’t want to be a Debbie Downer but don’t feel this is going to go how we want it. I just don’t understand with such obvious fraud people weren’t arrested instead of this continuous fight
over criminal actions even Helen Keller would see. I propose if the SC goes against us, Texas should secede from the rest of the states and get surrounding states to join. We could choke off the liberal states by withholding goods. Just a thought
In Supreme Court parlance, "docketed" just means "filed." And what Texas filed is not a lawsuit, but a motion for permission to file a lawsuit. The Court gave the defendants until Thursday to respond to that motion.
Regardless of the cases related to fraud, the Texas case will determine who will be President.
Whatever way is best for him
Thats how he’ll vote
Its all about his self interest
bookmark
“ Most excellent. Mark Levin said just earlier they wouldn’t do it for fear of repercussions such as civil unrest.”
i find it hard to believe Levine thinks the SC will let something unconstitutional stand because of fear.
It’s not just Pennsylvania. It is 4 states total.
SCOTUS only denied emergency injunction, not the merits. The opposition’s brief said that it would violate separation of powers for SCOTUS to intervene and I think they bought that argument. However, nothing prevents them from declaring that the election violated the constitution and should be placed in hands of the PA legislature.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
If Roberts votes with it he’ll write the decision and water it down as much as possible. Keep him off it and let Clarence write a 5-4 decision. Better yet, let Roberts join Breyera and Sotomayer and have Clarence write a 6-3 decision with Kogan #6. Unlikely, but she’s the most honest of the 3 official libs.
Nope, he is posturing, hoping to change the minds of real Constitutionalist he knows out number his perfidy. A sleazy blackmail fraud like Roberts never reforms, they just get sneakier.
Roberts was shamed into it.
It’s the Clarence Thomas Court ;-)
It’s not just Pennsylvania. It is 4 states total.
Is there a confirmation link, for that??
All I can find is a vid of Allen West (TX GOP Chair) saying this will happen.
Hoping it already has.
TIA.
The fear of Civil unrest argument is bull-loney. The Constitution doesn’t take a backseat for unrest or a pandemic (scamdemic). They must act according to the law and rule. To do nothing is not an option.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.