Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: SCOTUS has voted 6-3 to hear the Texas lawsuit
Twitter ^ | 8 Dec 20 | Washington Pundit

Posted on 12/08/2020 5:50:24 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Edited on 12/08/2020 6:03:18 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

SCOTUS has voted 6-3 to hear the Texas lawsuit.

Washington Pundit ©
@TWPundit
·
9m
The 6-3 SCOTUS RULING came to us as personal
communication from a trusted source. Since we could
not find an official declaration, we removed the
post. Praying it will come to fruition.

Link changed to the above messege.

Admin Moderator


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fakenews; tweetdeleted
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last
To: White Lives Matter

“Mark Levin said just earlier they wouldn’t do it for fear of repercussions such as civil unrest.”

Doesn’t SCOTUS get that there’ll be civil unrest either way? WE have had ENOUGH, and we won’t stand for having a president who didn’t win the election.


61 posted on 12/08/2020 6:13:46 PM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free" Galatians 5:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: austinaero

What the headline says is nonsense. There was no 6-3 vote on anything yet. Being put on the docket is routine for EVERYTHING that comes to the court. Asking for response is common. Thousands of petitions, applications, motions, etc. go through this process at the SCOTUS every year.

Free Republic is better then this fake news.


62 posted on 12/08/2020 6:14:35 PM PST by Stravinsky (Politeness will not defeat the Marxist revolutionaries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: livius

Don’t count on it.


63 posted on 12/08/2020 6:15:53 PM PST by Saveourcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Just an overall view, I think there is a large number of Dems/even libs that realize this theft.


64 posted on 12/08/2020 6:16:56 PM PST by Mark (Celebrities... is there anything they do not know? Homer Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter
UGH.

Washington Pundit ©
@TWPundit

The 6-3 SCOTUS RULING came to us as personal communication from a trusted source. Since we could not find an official declaration, we removed the post. Praying it will come to fruition.

65 posted on 12/08/2020 6:19:05 PM PST by Mozzafiato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

There will not be civil unrest until the Makers tangible ire is greater that of the Takers. Look at the Revolution, that took decades.


66 posted on 12/08/2020 6:19:24 PM PST by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

“This election is a farce. Half the country is being disenfranchised by approximately a dozen counties in the US. The same counties that “stopped the count”, did not allow poll watchers access, and where all these affidavits have been gathered.”

Well said.


67 posted on 12/08/2020 6:19:38 PM PST by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch
If the SCOTUS rules in favor of Texas and all the States that have joined with Texas, it will make all the other cases moot because a ruling for Texas, et al, ends all the litigation for the Presidency, and Trump will win.

They really shouldn't be. Every single case of fraud needs to go through the court system, and those committing fraud need to be imprisoned or executed. Plus, the only races made moot by this ruling would be in those four States. Every other State could still have their results overturned, and that includes plenty of downticket races with potential to be corrected.
68 posted on 12/08/2020 6:19:41 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Mozzafiato

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/end-case-trump-attorney-jordan-sekulow-mi-ga-pa-wi-required-respond-texas-case-thursday-good-news-video/


69 posted on 12/08/2020 6:21:46 PM PST by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mark

Many democrats voted for Trump.


70 posted on 12/08/2020 6:23:22 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Petrosius

Im talking about the vote to hear it

Not the vote on the case


71 posted on 12/08/2020 6:23:53 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

In a sane world it would have been 9-0


72 posted on 12/08/2020 6:24:19 PM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Doubt that...but one can dream,


73 posted on 12/08/2020 6:27:07 PM PST by Osage Orange (TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Well any justice that voted not to at least hear it is provably lawless and should be removed from the bench.


74 posted on 12/08/2020 6:27:13 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

Good thrust, refined vector: More like a “taxing issue”


75 posted on 12/08/2020 6:28:52 PM PST by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Roberts will vote to hear it, but will vote against doing anything.


76 posted on 12/08/2020 6:29:49 PM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
The Washington Pundit currently says:

The 6-3 SCOTUS RULING came to us as personal communication from a trusted source. Since we could not find an official declaration, we removed the post.

So at this point, the source for this thread does not confirm that the 6-3 ruling occurred.

From https://parler.com/profile/thewashingtonpundit/posts

Fake news.

77 posted on 12/08/2020 6:30:25 PM PST by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Too bad there wasnt an unconstitutional mandate in it

He’d rewrite the law


78 posted on 12/08/2020 6:30:57 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

HELLOOOOOOOO????? It ain’t picnics we’ve been seeing in the streets for the last several months!! This election has awakened more than a few Patriots that are sick of politics as usual and here in the South, they ain’t gonna put up with the shyte the blue states have allowed!!


79 posted on 12/08/2020 6:31:31 PM PST by Dawgreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter
Well...they and a lot of Pols ought to consider what has actually happened here.

We are not deaf..nor dumb or blind.

They better listen and read what we are saying.....

I'm pretty much mad as hell and ain't going to take anymore..............

80 posted on 12/08/2020 6:31:47 PM PST by Osage Orange (TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson