Posted on 12/08/2020 5:50:24 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Edited on 12/08/2020 6:03:18 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
SCOTUS has voted 6-3 to hear the Texas lawsuit.
Washington Pundit ©
@TWPundit
·
9m
The 6-3 SCOTUS RULING came to us as personal
communication from a trusted source. Since we could
not find an official declaration, we removed the
post. Praying it will come to fruition.
Link changed to the above messege.
Admin Moderator
Hes not
5-4 still would have heard the case
He risks nothing, he changes nothing
IOW, it’s nonsense.
Reversing PA will not change the results without more. The Court may be thinking it can rule on the legal issue without affecting the result.
1. Levin is tremendous, but not infallible; and
2. Maybe some of the Supremes have gotten a clue of what civil unrest could REALLY look like.
Fingers crossed. Prayers up, and up, and up.
6-3!! Not even close baby!
Probably censorship from twitter
Also by voting yes, he is more apt to persuade one of the five. A no vote and they would have ignored him.
I suggested on another post that this is why the SCOTUS declined to hear the Pennsylvania case.
If the SCOTUS rules in favor of Texas and all the States that have joined with Texas, it will make all the other cases moot because a ruling for Texas, et al, ends all the litigation for the Presidency, and Trump will win.
This a much simpler and cleaner way to all the election disputes.
Ok, this guarantees the liberals on the Court have no open mind and will definitely vote against TX. Roberts will likely be a no, too, even though he votes yes to hear the case. It’s all up to the Big 5 to hold the Republic together.
What is nonsense? That the case has been put on the docket and opposing arguments are accepted until a Thursday deadline? https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
Those 5 are all we need.
Twitter should not be the information source for this. Where is the Supreme Court public notice?
Twitter does tend to delete posts and/or suspend accounts if they don't like what a particular Tweet says ....
Update!
Here’s the official website for The Washington Pundit. The story is not there.
Kraken is warming up in bullpen
Its 5-4 wihout him,
Gonna pass either way
Makes no difference, so he can vote how he thinks he appears to look the best
In most cases “looking the best” is not voting with the liberal punts
But know his vote has nothing to do with what is right
It is more than looking the best. In the final decision, if he votes with the majority, he gets to pick who writes the opinion. If he votes with the minority in a 5-4 decision, the ranking member of the majority gets to pick who writes the opinion. In cases like this the wording of the opinion can be just as important as who wins.
“This the End All, Be All Case” – Trump Attorney Jordan Sekulow: MI, GA, PA and WI Are Required to Respond to Texas Case by Thursday, This is Good News (Video)
“Just a ruling to hear it. A step in the right direction.”
exactly.
Just to hear it, but ruling will be a different matter. However, unlike the “negative nancy freepers” who have their own faces up Biden’s ass, I always think positive.
“Where is the Supreme Court public notice?”
The justices and their clerks are very busy people. They will get to that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.