Posted on 12/08/2020 5:50:24 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Edited on 12/08/2020 6:03:18 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
SCOTUS has voted 6-3 to hear the Texas lawsuit.
Washington Pundit ©
@TWPundit
·
9m
The 6-3 SCOTUS RULING came to us as personal
communication from a trusted source. Since we could
not find an official declaration, we removed the
post. Praying it will come to fruition.
Link changed to the above messege.
Admin Moderator
“Mark Levin said just earlier they wouldn’t do it for fear of repercussions such as civil unrest.”
Doesn’t SCOTUS get that there’ll be civil unrest either way? WE have had ENOUGH, and we won’t stand for having a president who didn’t win the election.
What the headline says is nonsense. There was no 6-3 vote on anything yet. Being put on the docket is routine for EVERYTHING that comes to the court. Asking for response is common. Thousands of petitions, applications, motions, etc. go through this process at the SCOTUS every year.
Free Republic is better then this fake news.
Don’t count on it.
Just an overall view, I think there is a large number of Dems/even libs that realize this theft.
Washington Pundit ©
@TWPundit
The 6-3 SCOTUS RULING came to us as personal communication from a trusted source. Since we could not find an official declaration, we removed the post. Praying it will come to fruition.
There will not be civil unrest until the Makers tangible ire is greater that of the Takers. Look at the Revolution, that took decades.
“This election is a farce. Half the country is being disenfranchised by approximately a dozen counties in the US. The same counties that “stopped the count”, did not allow poll watchers access, and where all these affidavits have been gathered.”
Well said.
Many democrats voted for Trump.
Im talking about the vote to hear it
Not the vote on the case
In a sane world it would have been 9-0
Doubt that...but one can dream,
Well any justice that voted not to at least hear it is provably lawless and should be removed from the bench.
Good thrust, refined vector: More like a “taxing issue”
Roberts will vote to hear it, but will vote against doing anything.
The 6-3 SCOTUS RULING came to us as personal communication from a trusted source. Since we could not find an official declaration, we removed the post.
So at this point, the source for this thread does not confirm that the 6-3 ruling occurred.
From https://parler.com/profile/thewashingtonpundit/posts
Fake news.
Too bad there wasnt an unconstitutional mandate in it
He’d rewrite the law
HELLOOOOOOOO????? It ain’t picnics we’ve been seeing in the streets for the last several months!! This election has awakened more than a few Patriots that are sick of politics as usual and here in the South, they ain’t gonna put up with the shyte the blue states have allowed!!
We are not deaf..nor dumb or blind.
They better listen and read what we are saying.....
I'm pretty much mad as hell and ain't going to take anymore..............
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.