Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Posted on 12/08/2020 7:05:39 AM PST by Golden Eagle
Lawyers representing the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on Tuesday morning filed a motion to oppose a lawsuit filed by U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly, a Republican who zealously supports President Donald Trump. Kelly’s lawsuit argues that Pennsylvania’s supreme court violated the U.S. Constitution when it failed to rule that state election law violated the Pennsylvania constitution. In summary, the case seeks basically to flip the election in Trump’s favor in Pennsylvania.
(Excerpt) Read more at lawandcrime.com ...
Hopefully Alito et al are prepared.
Have they blown up one of his kid’s friends yet?
This is the first I have heard of the opposition/enemy filing a counter suit.
Wolf is okay with the fraud? Should be a prison term for that.
Is it more disruptive to assure there is no fraud or to accept a perceived fraudulently elected candidate?
bookmark
Let’s all drink to disruption :)
“Once the door is opened to judicial invalidation of presidential election results, it will be awfully hard to close that door again.”
The same can be said, more persuasively, about election fraud. Judicial actions, however “unprecedented”, can be reversed, eventually. A corrupt government that installs itself by fraud, on the other hand, is self-perpetuating. You can never vote it out of power.
Justice Alito from the US Supreme Court requested this response from PA, by this morning, to help him and the US Supreme Court might rule.
This is what they sent Alito. Now we wait.
Since when have we become a constitutional democracy?
That was my first thought as well. And while their core argument there was somehat persuasive, consider the source. Probably not even correct historically if checked completely.
They don’t want THE EVIDENCE presented in court!
Is it more disruptive to assure there is no fraud or to accept a perceived fraudulently elected candidate?
***********
One could also ask are there any limits on the level of voting fraud and/or manipulation of elections? If not, then we are surely on a very slippery slope toward a bad place.
There will be no “flipping” the election to Trump. HE WON BY A HUGE MARGIN !!!!!
They only file counter-suits when the court is not corrupt.
So - yes, a good sign.
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Exactly. I get so tired of hearing it called a "democracy". It's a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.
There, I feel better. :-)
Maybe we should call it a Constitutional Monarchy and see if anyone notices.
Then, if the term needs to be “corrected” we can make the point that we are clearly established as a Republic.
Vote flipping evidence explained on video;
Dominion ‘Vote Flip’, Fact vs Fiction in Ware County Ga.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1336177638528983041
From the Video at 2:50;
OAN Reporter “Voter GA confirmed with the Ware County Election director indeed, 37 votes had been electronically switched for unknown reasons. A mistake discovered during the hand recount. Oddly, the 37 vote mistake represented the 0.26% of the county totals, exactly Biden’s statewide margin total of 0.26%”
They don’t want THE EVIDENCE presented in court!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.