Posted on 11/25/2020 7:34:13 AM PST by SJackson
Biden has called for Americans to come together. But on what common ground?
Mark Tapson is the Shillman Fellow on Popular Culture for the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
Now that the Democratic Party and its media enablers have unilaterally and pre-emptively declared their empty-suit candidate Joe Biden to be the President-elect, and are eager to move forward with their fundamental transformation of the United States, the obligatory calls for unity have begun.
Biden himself presumed to deliver an election “victory” speech in which he made a plea so hypocritical that it would be comical if it weren’t so outrageous. “Now let’s give each other a chance,” he stated. “It's time to put away the harsh rhetoric, lower the temperature.” Maybe that means he will stop referring to Trump supporters as “chumps” and will denounce Antifa violence against them as more than just “an idea.”
Biden went on to unintentionally acknowledge that his supporters have spent the last four years smearing us as fascist, violent, white supremacist deplorables: “And to make progress, we have to stop treating our opponents as our enemies,” he urged. “They are not our enemies. They're Americans.” This statement would seem much more sincere and meaningful if he had declared it at some point in all the time that conservatives were being harassed in public spaces and assaulted in the streets in the lead-up to the election.
Former First Lady Michelle Obama, too, took to Twitter recently to urge Democrats to reach out to Trump voters. This is how she phrased it: “Let’s remember that tens of millions of people voted for the status quo, even when it meant supporting lies, hate, chaos, and division. We’ve got a lot of work to do to reach out to these folks in the years ahead and connect with them on what unites us.” Even when calling for reconciliation the left demonizes conservatives as hate-mongers on the wrong side of history who need re-education camps to get their heads straight.
(To clarify: I use the terms “Democrats” and “the left” interchangeably, because the Democratic Party is not “liberal”; it is controlled by totalitarian radicals like the young members of “the Squad” in the House of Representatives. Conservatives are the classical liberals now. The only “liberals” remaining among the Democrats are waking up and #WalkingAway from their own Party’s illiberal radicalism.)
Apart from the fact that it is Michelle’s side that supported (and continues to support) the lies, hate, chaos, and division, we all know what “unity” means to Democrats: total compliance with their globalist, collectivist agenda. As the left’s calls to compile an enemies list of Trump supporters demonstrates, they have no intention of uniting, coexisting, or working with conservatives — only ostracizing, destroying, and eliminating any political opposition once and for all.
No matter whom is ultimately declared the winner of the presidential election, is any semblance of unity even possible? If Biden wins, half the country will consider him “Not My President” and resist his party’s radical agenda. If Trump wins, the other half of the country will consider him “Not My President” and will escalate its violent revolution already underway. Where is the common ground Michelle O alluded to between us?
There is none. There are two distinct Americas today, each side passionately supporting starkly opposed and irreconcilable worldviews.
One side acknowledges that America is imperfect but still takes pride in our exceptionalism; the other side believes America is the villain of history and must be fundamentally remade from the foundations up.
One side wants secure borders, legal immigration, and America First; the other wants open borders, amnesty for millions of illegals, and globalist policies.
One side holds to the principles of the Constitution and our God-given rights such as freedom of speech; the other believes the Constitution is outdated and unwoke, that God is dead anyway, and that free speech empowers fascists.
One side believes in the sanctity of unborn lives; the other considers the unborn a mere clump of cells that can be discarded when inconvenient.
One side rejects a Green New Deal as a big-government boondoggle and socialist power grab; the other frets that the world will end in twelve years without it.
One side rejects government COVID lockdowns and mask-and-social-distancing mandates as dehumanizing, tyrannical and destructive; the other embraces compliance as a loving gesture toward our fellow man.
One side believes fairness means equality of opportunity; the other believes fairness means equality of outcome.
One side believes the news media should strive for objectivity; the other believes objectivity is a racist Western concept and that journalists should reject it and be activists for social justice.
One side believes in reasoned debate; the other believes that words are violence, that there are no universal truths, and that reason itself is an oppressive tool of white privilege.
One side believes political violence is a sign of Third-World lawlessness; the other believes pre-emptive violence against political opponents is self-defense and anti-fascist.
One side believes nothing justifies rioting and looting; the other defends rioting and looting as reparations for slavery, and considers the terms “rioting” and “looting” themselves to be racist dog-whistles.
I could go on, but the obvious point is that on literally every issue facing America today, there is a Grand Canyon-sized gulf between left and right perspectives. There is no way to bridge this divide and bring these two Americas together, not even in a contentious coexistence. Matter cannot exist in the same space as anti-matter. To borrow from the tagline of the 1986 movie Highlander, “there can be only one.” For the country to survive, one of these worldviews must resoundingly defeat the other in the marketplace of ideas, in the halls of power, and if necessary, in the streets.
Does this mean a literal civil war is imminent? No, a civil war is already underway, but only one side is waging it. Video evidence of violence and unhinged harassment against conservatives abounds on the internet. Cells of Antifa shock troops have sprung up seemingly overnight to sow discord and brutalize Trump supporters. We are way past the point where the left will heed tepid pleas for civility; their lust for total power has vaulted them beyond law and order, beyond morality itself when it comes to crushing political opposition.
No one – not a man, woman, child, senior citizen, or disabled person – who openly expresses his or her conservatism or even basic patriotism can be assured of safety from vicious verbal or physical assault anywhere anymore – in the streets, in restaurants, in schools, anywhere. Writing about this normalization of leftist political violence at The Federalist, David Marcus warns that “a step back needs to be taken now.” It certainly does, but those who need to heed that warning have no incentive to do so. They have learned that violence and intimidation work. They have suffered precious little consequence from law enforcement, from the news media, and from their political leaders, so the verbal and physical brutality against conservatives will remain the new normal even if Biden is declared President. (If Trump is declared the winner, everyone knows that all leftist hell will break loose; the rioting and chaos we have seen thus far will be just a foretaste.) Yet the cultural complex of media/academia/showbiz continues to relentlessly promote The Narrative that the right is the violent, fascist threat. And now Joe Biden expects unity?
For the two Americas to find any common ground to work toward unity, they must share at least a few essential points of agreement like a love for country, a respect for law and order, and a shared sense of American identity, among others. But as long as the country is stretched to the breaking point between such ideological, existential, and moral opposites, the two repelling poles cannot come together. There can be only one.
The Rise and Decline of the State by Martin van Creveld.
The Sovereign Individual by Rees-Mogg and Davidson. They predicted the rise of violence and corruption as the state disintegrates.
Trampling on the Bill of Rights via a $200 gun tax is not a path to unity.
How can there be unity when one side wants power and control and the other wants freedom and liberty?
The left is killing America....and they think we should unify? Like He**
This must have been what it was like when New England blue state culture raised its ugly head in 1860.
What we really need is to return to the US being 50 separate, sovereign states loosely united under a Federal Government.
Let there be 50 separate laboratories. What works can be emulated, what fails discarded.
We would have to find a way to stop the Feds from subsidizing failure, though.
Indeed. Once upon a time, we were a federation of the several states. And states could adopt very different policies. They had a right to do so.
But as of the mid-1800s, we became one federal system composed of units called states. Most "important" things now operate at the national level and it's one-size-fits-all in many ways. And it's been downhill ever since as we constantly tried to paper over the disunity by satisfying the lowest common denominator. That lasted for a good long while, but now one side has become so extreme and violent that the disunity can no longer be papered over. And now we have no good mechanism to actually resolve the disunity. The schools, media, courts, and elections are all taken over by anti-American forces, and the majority of Americans feel that they are left with no recourse and no good choices.
If President Trump gets this election sent over to Congress as per a Supreme Court order, will these bastards call for unity then? (Florida has the right idea, make it legal to shoot looters during a riot).
Supreme Court can’t order the election to Congress. State legislators are the only hope.
Very well written essay ...
Yes. Though politicians worry about what works for them, not the populace.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Not EVERYONE wants legal immigration. It has been abused for so long now and needs to stop for many decades. 80-90% of legal immigrants go to become DEMOCRATS.
It’s simple. Like any horde of barbarians throughout history, either you are on top of them or they are on top of you. No middle ground. The only way to win is to be more “barbarian” than they they are.
Suppose the Supreme Court comes to the obvious conclusion that state laws were hijacked from the State Legislatures by entities that exceeded their Constitutional role and kick back the elections to the Legislatures where their role was violated. Would that work?
If it works for the pols, and doesn’t fall apart into anarchy and ruin, then I’m good with it.
It isn’t the Federales’ job to determine right or wrong in how the state is run, just to make sure that the states meet their Constitutional obligations - which are generally fairly vague and unrestrictive. It is the pallet-loads of Federal Laws and Regulations that are the problem.
Also there is the option to vote with your feet. People and businesses can move to other states.
After four years of being called racists, homophobes, deplorables, and hundreds of other vile names and having been threatened with imprisonment and re-education camps upt to the point of having been threatened with death, and year after year of lies and propaganda, NOW they want to pretend that all should be forgiven and forgotten and join together in unity?
A big F**K YOU to the entire DemoKKKrat party!
“...As long as the Union was faithful to her trust
Like friends and like brethren, kind we were, and just
But now, when Northern treachery attempts our rights to mar
We hoist on high the Bonnie Blue Flag that bears a single star...”
“stop the Feds from subsidizing failure”
Step 1: Stop sending them so damn much money.
In other words, aint gonna happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.