Posted on 11/23/2020 7:53:20 AM PST by time4good
Executive Summary
We find considerable evidence consistent with the possibility of electoral fraud in vote counts in Montgomery County, PA.
In particular, we examine a highly anomalous update to mail vote totals in the NYT/Edison data which enormously benefited Biden, and which looks suspicious on a number of dimensions.
At a high level, our results are suggestive of a new and highly suspicious batch of mail ballots being added to the count sometime between Wednesday early morning and Thursday morning. These ballots are drawn from an implausible distribution that enormously favored Biden and simultaneously harmed Trump (the latter being done in addition by allocating more votes to Jorgensen). Said mail ballots end up being extremely different both from the mail ballots that came before (as measured in NYT data), and the mail ballots that came afterwards (as measured in the county’s own data).
The key evidence is as follows:
(Excerpt) Read more at revolver.news ...
This was a very good piece based on actual data and numbers and I would urge people to read this.
Montgomery county reported on the radio (990 AM} a monster drop of mail in ballots in the Am.
Let me guess, there was fraud but not enough to change the results of sham election! Oh and none of the downballot races were affected!
I searched and searched for a conclusion that said something to the effect of “in a fair election President Trump would have gained x number of votes.” That’s really all that matters. If all this does is move a few hundred votes it sheds light but does not move the needle.
If the courts buy in to the idea that what happened is a mathematical impossibility, there is enough to move the needle in each of the swing states.
Dupe thead was pulled. That poster didn’t do a headline search, obviously :- /
The time difference between my post with time4good was 45 sec.
The important thing is the info was posted.
Even if a lower court took one of these cases and rendered a decision, prompting a review by the SCOTUS, they won't touch this case...period.
Part 2 followup article was posted on Revolver News.
Sorry do not mean to come down on you but ive noticed this a lot here—’
What is wrong with important thread topics appearIng multiple times?
IF WE CONSIDER CONTENT IMPORTANT AND WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW ABOUT IT—WE WANT IT TO SHOW UP AND CATCH AS MANY DRIVE-BY READERS AS POSSIBLE.
I dont think we are a bunch of anal libarians trying to build the most crackerjack tightly organized, non duplicated data base. Or are we?
I’m not talking about the frequent activity members, or the regulars, I’m talking the 90% of people that visit forums, hit and miss—impulse readers—scanning this site, usually first 3 pages I imagine—they read the content that pulls them.
It’s logical-—if you’re part of a movement that are trying to impact hearts and minds, (which we, by de facto are, by virtue of this public posting board) we WANT the big items show up organically—multiple times—and catch and inform as many as possible.
I’m not advocating operationalizing it—just letting it flow a bit.
Marketing 101—which I’m in—if you want your message widely exposed to the most amount of people, you have to put it out there multiple times.
We cant forget we are working a handicap here—we’re trying to spread content that the media has blacked out, soviet style.
The last thing we need is too get precious about the tidiness of how often the big deal content appears. Frequency has the effect of amplification—building critical mass—trumpets—perception builds energy that can bring more on board.
For the good stuff, repetition is in our favor.
Hi taffy Lucy....
Again, welcome to FR....but, I repeat myself :-)
I, too, am in marketing....and, have been involved in Sales and/or Marketing, for well over two decades.
And, not disparaging, you, however, I disagree, in that pertinent and related replies tend to get disorganized and hard to keep track of, on dupe threads. For future referencing and research, it can make efforts frustrating.
Keywords help, but folks, here, do not use the keyword function, religiously, so....that typically leaves us with headline searches.
I didn’t read the whole thing yet - it’s huge and lots of in the weeds and graphs. But from what the Revolver guy said to Bannon on Warroom this morning, the writers do focus on the HUGE vote spikes and dumps, i.e., Yes, the fraud that swings Pennsylvania. They also are looking at the other states.
Hi Jane,
I take your point—I guess we have a split decision ;-)
I do agree to the future referencing part— you ‘re 100% correct—it’s a pain when Im researching and I have to sift through a bunch of dry wells, that by their tag teased good info.
However in this *emergency* scenario, I gladly error on the side of more exposure is better to keep the important stuff on the radar without the necessity of keyword searches. (I assume minimal user savvy, my parents as case study, not that Im any tech whiz).
It’s the out-of-home advertising, blasting by the spontaneous billboard effect, Im talking about.
Its amazing and exhausting how many people that I know and work with that sustain on MSM headlines that have zero awareness of so much that we discuss here.
Glad to meet a fellow marketeer :-)
p
Fact 1: On November 5th at 9:09am, an update in Montgomery County NYT-reported election results sees reported mail votes increase by 90,022, but total votes increase by only 9,534 votes. The implied number of in-person votes thus decreases by 80,488.
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out what’s going on here.
They were “vote swapping” bogus mail-in votes for Biden for the walk-in votes for Trump. This was done at the tabulation level by code in the software that had to be initiated by someone.
They keep the mail-in ballots to bolster the validity of any recount, and dump the ballot paperwork of the walk-ins as these would have been kept/stored separately and easy to lay one’s hands on.
This was likely the MO most everywhere.
I don’t understand the significance of the vote dump. The author seems to be saying that almost as many Biden votes were removed from the in-person count as were added to the mail-in count. At best, Biden gains around 9,000 votes, which would be significant if all of them were illegal, but why add 90,000 and then take away 80,000? Why not just add the 9,000? It’s pretty confusing, and I usually am able to grasp this sort of thing fairly easily.
I understand that it looks fishy, but I don’t see how it creates much of a Biden advantage, or why they’d bother to go at it that way. Just create the 9,000 fraudulent ballots and salt them in with the rest of the mail-ins.
There’s got to be more to it than the way it’s described.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.