Honestly, I think this is a weak angle.
Joe Frazier voted this year. Other dead people did too. How many can you find? 500? 1000? It’s not a significant number. It didn’t determine the outcome. They will not give you a “do over” because Joe Frazier voted.
You need large numbers of orchestrated fraudulent votes. The Software is a promising angle. Holding up obituaries is a poor distraction.
To Clearcase: This is excellent and I’m sure that won’t be Trump’s only angle, just the funniest one.
To all: I love this President! He fights! The rallies are a brilliant idea! We need the PEOPLE marching in the streets!
The dead voters are evidence of what is a much bigger issue: voters who are alive and are legitimately registered but had SOMEONE ELSE vote in their name.
This is a great idea. Energize the base even further. Holding up obits was probably put in the article to make it seem weak. People are ready to fight and this will get us fired up even more. I would personally love a million of us armed marching on DC. Love to put the fear of God into those communist scumbags.
I saw that there was about 5K or 6K dead people who voted in Nevada.
Because most Americans are mouth-breathing idiots.
Just got off Twitter with a mouth-breather who thinks that the national vote is the REAL vote.
Its all about the humor, and dead people voting makes for good jokes. Remember, ridicule is a powerful force in politics. His great legal team will take care of the compilation of hard evidence of massive voter fraud.
It’s technically weak but a good stunt. Maybe they’ll be someone named Methuselah, Jared, Noah.
It’s not distraction, it’s persuasion. Examples like these everyone can understand.
Certainly the legal cases to be made will be much more detailed and widespread.
Trump’s a persuader. A damn good one he picked up 8 million more votes than in 2016 despite everything.
The rallies are to whip up public support for the overall strategy in winning this election. This gets people actually mocking the attempts to cheat.
The purpose is to put pressure on state legislators AND show how corrupt the election system is. The court effort is entirely different
How many times/places did RBG vote in November?
The overwhelming narrative being pushed in the media and by the tech companies is that there is no proof of fraud and election fraud isn’t a thing. By generating a list of obituaries and absentee ballot requests, it moves the needle from “there is no fraud” to “yeah, okay, there was some fraud... but it’s so rare it never makes a difference.”
That is now a testable hypothesis and it changes the media narrative. It’s also a visual proof that something funny is going on, and visuals are important in the TV age. It also changes the legal burden to the states to, if they are going to try to be honest, validate their voter rolls against ballots received.
Agree... weak angle. Energy best spent elsewhere.
The voter turnout in Wisconsin to me seems like conclusive evidence BUT questioning an 89% turnout when elections have been in the mid 60s is not a PR winner. Stopping the count in the middle of the night is not as conclusive as the statistical number argument I’ve read BUT people instinctively know that something is not on the up and up with that. You goto the courts with the facts but for PR you use the sound byte hits. That’s how I see it. I’ll back them down any path and won’t simply be a negative voice online.
You’re looking at this from the perspective of a well-informed politically savvy person. This is not meant for you. It is meant to communicate this issue to the average Joe.
It sets the table that there is a real problem with this election in terms the average Joe that pays no attention whatsoever until weeks before an election can grasp.
Well thank God he’ the one smart enough to use the easiest cheating to understand which Directly led to a vote being counted.
Both. Not one or the other.
He’s not going before the SCOTUS with it.
How many people are sophisticated enough to understand how a software product can be set up to cheat?
Inspectors being told to step back is gonna be very bad for the biden team. But it doesn’t up front definitely prove a vote was counted or lost.
The obits cover both angles.
Good for him
This is not a “weak angle” as you suggest. There are numerous battles to be fought. In terms of getting the message out to the people, showing the absurdity of dead people voting plants the seed of election fraud.
Let the mustard seed grow and propagate.
Just looked up this reporter and her news org just on Twitter.
I have NO confidence anything this fake media person says is factual. This story reeks of the same angle of both First Lady and Jared K requesting The President to concede.
Not enough BUT a good start to SHOW some proofs among many which NEED STRAIGHT INVESTIGATION .
TRUMP is right . There were many kinds of FRAUD . This is one and it’s good to tell it and show it CLEAR and LOUD in front of the vicious medias
Richard Baris from People Pundit, a very smart data anlytics found 10,000 in one run, you don’t have to prove that there were 1 million dead vtes just prove that there was enough fraud that a canvas or recount is needed
Peoples_Pundit
@Peoples_Pundit
“Just under 10k confirmed dead returned absentee ballots in Michigan. We’re done, for now.
While I’m open to the idea some of these have been rejected, I’m not open to any outright dismissal they all were rejected.
This was a small, tested listed that suggests irregs are plenty.”