Posted on 11/05/2020 11:24:23 AM PST by CassieL
state judge on Thursday dismissed the Trump campaign's lawsuit seeking to halt the counting of absentee ballots in Michigan.
Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens said during a hearing she would be rejecting the campaign's lawsuit, filed the previous day, that alleged Republican officials had been denied access to video of ballot drop boxes.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Absolutely. I thought the MI SOS’s comment was notable because a lot of them are saying “Count all the votes.” We would not agree with her about what she would deem to be “valid votes.”
What happens when the media calls one of these states for Biden and declares him President Elect?? We know it’s coming.
If Trump could get just one highly-suspect state to do a total recount under cameras and in a highly-scrutinized fashion, the cheating rats would be exposed for all time! Then many other states would come under scrutiny as well.
Cynthia Stephens is a judge on the Michigan First District Court of Appeals. She was appointed to the court in 2008 by Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm.[1] On November 2, 2010, she was elected to full six-year term. She was re-elected on November 8, 2016.[2][3] Her current term expires on January 1, 2023.
https://ballotpedia.org/Cynthia_Stephens
“29 Let mine adversaries be clothed with shame, and let them cover themselves with their own confusion, as with a mantle.”
Psalm 109:29
nuff said
“Someone needs to lock John Roberts in a closet until this is all over.”
Then when it’s over, he can officially “come out of the closet” if you know what I mean, heh, heh.
Picture says it all....
No vacancies in the slate of judges.
Good!
claiming that verse with you Norski!
I like your writing style and thoughts. But that approach may backfire against Trump and he’ll be seen as a tyrant taking military control, especially if he is not backed up by calls from the Senate or House to stop this injustice. I’m not surprised the DOJ is doing nothing... that is what they typically do. If Trump doesn’t get any kind of support he will be tared and feathered even by his own people.
The constitution anticipates that a state or states may fail to send electoral ballots, or send conflicting sets. If THAT dispute results in inability to choose a POTUS, then the Congress picks.
The law likewise allows Congress to dispute a states electoral ballots. This has happened recently, John Kerry moved for this recently. Congress rejected the motion, but it (Congress) can reject a state's slate of electors.
Here in Michigan I heard a radio personality’s description of a judge who always lets Dem types go without a problem and always rules against business and individual freedom defendants. Turns out she was the one in question.
Said to be perhaps the most leftist biased judge in the state.
100%
Maybe the Michigan and Wisconsin GOP should formally challenge the vote counts at some point. We have videos of very suspicious activity. My guess is that SCOTUS doesn’t want to get involved. If the House decides each state gets one vote, as you know.
Local state leftist judge...
Yeah, those people in flyover country will never figure out the American left is giving it to them up the ass. :)
/sarc(??????)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.